Daher Mohammad, Aoun Marven, Cottrill Ethan J, Wang Zhi, Hurley Richard K, Lavelle William F, Passias Peter G, Diebo Bassel G, Daniels Alan H, Sebaaly Amer
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hotel Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Mar 15;50(6):412-419. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005252. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Meta-analysis.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to pool the available data comparing MIS to open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures and provide a more comprehensive assessment of this topic.
There remains a debate over whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open fixation provides superior outcomes for patients with thoracolumbar fractures. While several randomized controlled trials and prospective studies have compared these two approaches, the published studies are limited by sample size.
Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases was performed on October 1, 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications, surgery-related parameters, early and late postoperative back pain, and postoperative regional kyphosis.
Five RCTs and five prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 584 patients, with 299 in the MIS group and 285 in the open group. MIS patients were shown to have less EBL (MD=-155.86; 95% CI: -217.97 to -93.76, P <0.001), a shorter LOS (MD=-3.34; 95% CI: -4.62 to -2.06, P <0.001), lower pain scores during the early postoperative period (MD=-1.14; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.71, P <0.001), and less regional kyphosis (MD=-5.17; 95% CI: -7.17 to -3.16, P <0.001), even when stratifying by study type. In addition, fluoroscopy time was longer in the MIS group (MD=0.60; 95% CI: 0.21-0.98, P =0.003), although this difference was not seen when looking at RCTs only.
Among patients with thoracolumbar fractures, treatment with MIS was associated with decreased EBL, shorter LOS, earlier pain reduction, and less regional kyphosis compared with treatment with open fixation. In addition, higher radiation exposure was seen among patients treated with MIS. While MIS offers several potential benefits, both MIS and open fixation remain safe and reliable options for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
荟萃分析。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是汇总比较微创与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的现有数据,并对该主题进行更全面的评估。
对于胸腰椎骨折患者,微创手术(MIS)或开放固定术哪种能提供更好的治疗效果仍存在争议。虽然有几项随机对照试验和前瞻性研究比较了这两种方法,但已发表的研究受样本量限制。
按照PRISMA指南,于2024年10月1日对PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌学术(第1 - 20页)数据库进行了系统评价。提取的数据包括并发症、手术相关参数、术后早期和晚期背痛以及术后局部后凸畸形。
荟萃分析纳入了5项随机对照试验和5项前瞻性研究,共584例患者,其中MIS组299例,开放手术组285例。结果显示,MIS组患者的术中失血量较少(MD = - 155.86;95%CI:- 217.97至- 93.76,P < 0.001),住院时间较短(MD = - 3.34;95%CI:- 4.62至- 2.06,P < 0.001),术后早期疼痛评分较低(MD = - 1.14;95%CI:- 1.56至- 0.71,P < 0.001),局部后凸畸形较少(MD = - 5.17;95%CI:- 7.17至- 3.16,P < 0.001),即使按研究类型分层分析也是如此。此外,MIS组的透视时间较长(MD = 0.60;95%CI:0.21 - 0.98,P = 0.003),不过仅观察随机对照试验时未发现这种差异。
在胸腰椎骨折患者中,与开放固定术相比,MIS治疗与术中失血量减少、住院时间缩短、疼痛缓解更早以及局部后凸畸形减少相关。此外,接受MIS治疗的患者辐射暴露更高。虽然MIS有几个潜在益处,但MIS和开放固定术仍然都是治疗胸腰椎骨折安全可靠的选择。