Otto Bettina, Lindemann Regina, Kirsch Holger, Schmid Matthias, Vatter Hartmut, Braun Christiane
Early Rehabilitation Department, Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshöhe, Bonn, Germany.
Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jul 24;6:1598300. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1598300. eCollection 2025.
Tracheostomy is one of the standard procedures in intensive care medicine. In the context of tracheostomy tube-, dysphagia- and decannulation management the selection of the appropriate tracheostomy tube model (angle, diameter, length) is crucial for the proper placement in the trachea. In spite of recent guidelines mentioning endoscopic control of the tube placement as a useful measure, data regarding the proper placement are rare in the present literature. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of tracheostomy tube placement in patients admitted to our early neurological rehabilitation center.
We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients with tracheostomy tube admitted to our early neurological rehabilitation center between 12/2022 and 01/2024. We analyzed the frequency, type and extent of injuries caused by a suboptimal placement of the tracheostomy tubes. The location of the tubes was routinely controlled endoscopically upon admission. In total 327 tracheoscopies were carried out. Clinical characteristics were collected in all patients and the endoscopic results were divided into malpositioned tracheostomy tubes (non-central tube position, often causing mucosal lesions, ulcer, bleeding) vs. well-positioned (central or almost central) tubes. The association between the quality of the tracheostomy tube placement and the characteristics age, gender, main diagnosis, tracheostomy procedure, time until initial endoscopic control of tracheostomy tube fitting after admission and after tracheostomy were analyzed using a logistic regression model.
A total of 214 examinations (65%) revealed a malpositioned tracheostomy tube. In 19% of the carried out tracheoscopies (327), manifest injuries were already detectable (mucosal lesion, ulcer, bleeding). 113 examinations (35%) showed an acceptable tube placement. We found no association between the quality of the tracheostomy tube position and gender, age, main diagnosis, time until initial endoscopic control of tube fitting or type of tracheostomy.
Since we found a high percentage of suboptimal tracheostomy tube positions (65%), an increased risk of complications can be assumed. With a view to the most relevant late complication of tracheal stenosis, there is agreement that the fundamental lesion begins with mucosal ulceration, which we found in 19% of the investigations. Therefore, the present data strongly suggest that a routine endoscopic control of tracheostomy tube placement should be firmly implemented into the routine tracheostomy tube management. Our data further suggest that the supply with tracheostomy tubes needs to be optimized.
气管造口术是重症监护医学中的标准操作之一。在气管造口管、吞咽困难和拔管管理方面,选择合适的气管造口管型号(角度、直径、长度)对于正确放置在气管中至关重要。尽管最近的指南提到内镜控制气管造口管放置是一项有用的措施,但目前文献中关于正确放置的数据很少。因此,本研究的目的是调查入住我们早期神经康复中心的患者气管造口管放置的准确性。
我们对2022年12月至2024年1月期间入住我们早期神经康复中心的所有气管造口管患者进行了回顾性单中心分析。我们分析了气管造口管放置不当所导致损伤的频率、类型和程度。患者入院时常规通过内镜检查气管造口管的位置。共进行了327次气管镜检查。收集了所有患者的临床特征,并将内镜检查结果分为气管造口管位置不当(非中心位置,常导致黏膜损伤、溃疡、出血)与位置良好(中心或几乎中心)的气管造口管。使用逻辑回归模型分析气管造口管放置质量与年龄、性别、主要诊断、气管造口术操作、入院后及气管造口术后至首次内镜检查气管造口管适配情况的时间等特征之间的关联。
总共214次检查(65%)显示气管造口管位置不当。在19%的气管镜检查(327次)中,已可检测到明显损伤(黏膜损伤、溃疡、出血)。113次检查(35%)显示气管造口管放置可接受。我们发现气管造口管位置质量与性别、年龄、主要诊断、首次内镜检查气管造口管适配情况的时间或气管造口术类型之间无关联。
由于我们发现气管造口管位置不当的比例很高(65%),可以推测并发症风险增加。考虑到最相关的晚期并发症气管狭窄,人们一致认为基本病变始于黏膜溃疡,我们在19%的调查中发现了这种情况。因此,本数据强烈表明应将气管造口管放置的常规内镜检查牢固纳入常规气管造口管管理中。我们的数据还表明气管造口管的供应需要优化。