Liu Catherine, Yang Hongmei, Bylund Kevin, Cummings Michael, Zhang Hong
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States.
Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Front Urol. 2025 Jun 30;5:1598726. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2025.1598726. eCollection 2025.
There are many treatment options for localized prostate cancer, including external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and prostate brachytherapy (BT). This study aimed to compare the travel burdens of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) at our BT center and EBRT or SBRT if administered close to home.
This single-institution retrospective cohort study included 69 patients who had HDR-BT monotherapy for their prostate cancer from August 2017 to December 2022. The travel burden for HDR-BT monotherapy was estimated using Google Maps by measuring the distance from each patient's home address to our BT center. The total travel burden was calculated by multiplying the number of treatment fractions required for each modality by the roundtrip travel distance between the home and the treatment facility. Treatment toxicity was evaluated using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) questionnaire.
The median age of the 69 patients was 67 years. The mean distance from home to the BT center was 37.4 mi, while the mean distance to the nearest radiation facility was 8.3 mi. The mean total travel distance for HDR-BT was 150 mi, while those for EBRT and SBRT were 463 and 83 mi, respectively. HDR-BT resulted in a mean travel burden reduction of 313 mi compared with EBRT. The EPIC-CP scores indicated minimal posttreatment toxicity, with most patients reporting stable or improved symptoms.
HDR-BT monotherapy significantly reduces the travel burden compared with EBRT for localized prostate cancer, with minimal treatment-associated toxicity. Increasing the availability of BT centers could further alleviate the travel burden. Alternatively, providing transportation support could improve access to care.
局部前列腺癌有多种治疗选择,包括外照射放疗(EBRT)、立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)和前列腺近距离放疗(BT)。本研究旨在比较我们的BT中心进行高剂量率近距离放疗(HDR-BT)与在离家较近的地方进行EBRT或SBRT的出行负担。
这项单机构回顾性队列研究纳入了2017年8月至2022年12月期间接受HDR-BT单药治疗前列腺癌的69例患者。使用谷歌地图通过测量每位患者家庭住址到我们BT中心的距离来估算HDR-BT单药治疗的出行负担。总出行负担通过将每种治疗方式所需的治疗次数乘以家和治疗机构之间的往返出行距离来计算。使用临床实践扩展前列腺指数综合问卷(EPIC-CP)评估治疗毒性。
69例患者的中位年龄为67岁。从家到BT中心的平均距离为37.4英里,而到最近放疗机构的平均距离为8.3英里。HDR-BT的平均总出行距离为150英里,而EBRT和SBRT的分别为463英里和83英里。与EBRT相比,HDR-BT使平均出行负担减少了313英里。EPIC-CP评分表明治疗后毒性极小,大多数患者报告症状稳定或改善。
对于局部前列腺癌,与EBRT相比,HDR-BT单药治疗显著减轻了出行负担,且治疗相关毒性极小。增加BT中心的可及性可进一步减轻出行负担。或者,提供交通支持可改善就医机会。