• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫功能正常和免疫功能低下的儿科人群中加速2剂皮内狂犬病暴露前预防方案的免疫原性和安全性:一项比较研究。

Immunogenicity and safety of the accelerated 2-dose intradermal rabies pre exposure prophylaxis regimen in immunocompetent and immunocompromised pediatric populations: a comparative study.

作者信息

Agarwal Anurag, Singh Charu, Mathur Surendra Bahadur, Manchanda Vikas, Agarwal Kashvi, Mantan Mukta, Khan Amir Maroof

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College & Associated Hospitals, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.

Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Child Health, Sector- 30, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, 201303, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Infection. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02623-8.

DOI:10.1007/s15010-025-02623-8
PMID:40779007
Abstract

PURPOSE

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease, and India accounts for 35% of global rabies-related deaths. In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) revised its guidelines for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) from a 3-dose to a cost-saving 2-dose intradermal (ID) regimen. This study evaluates the immunogenicity and safety of this regimen in pediatric populations, including children exposed to immunosuppressant therapy.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, comparative follow-up study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Participants (5-18 years) were enrolled into two groups: (1) children with no known immunodeficiency (n = 31) and (2) children on immunosuppressant therapy (n = 10). All received Vero cell culture rabies vaccine (RABIVAX-S) intradermally at two sites on days 0 and 7. Serum anti-rabies virus glycoprotein antibody titres were assessed on days 28, 90, and 180 using an ELISA-based assay. Booster doses were administered to those with insufficient titers (≤ 0.5 EU/ml).

RESULTS

By day 28, both groups achieved a 100% seroconversion rate (SCR). Geometric mean titers (GMT) were 2.168 EU/ml and 1.547 EU/ml in the no-known-immunodeficiency and immunosuppressant therapy groups, respectively. At day 90, SCRs were 90% and 70%, with GMTs of 1.358 EU/ml and 0.962 EU/ml, respectively. Booster doses restored titers in all participants with insufficient levels. Pain at the injection site was the only solicited adverse effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-dose ID PrEP regimen is immunogenic and safe in pediatric populations, including immunosuppressed children. It offers a cost-effective alternative in rabies-endemic regions, enhancing compliance and accessibility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India with Trial Registration No. CTRI/2022/10/046777.

摘要

目的

狂犬病是一种致命的人畜共患病,印度占全球狂犬病相关死亡人数的35%。2018年,世界卫生组织(WHO)将其暴露前预防(PrEP)指南从3剂改为成本节约型的2剂皮内(ID)方案。本研究评估了该方案在儿科人群中的免疫原性和安全性,包括接受免疫抑制治疗的儿童。

方法

本单中心、前瞻性、对比随访研究在一家三级护理医院进行。参与者(5 - 18岁)被分为两组:(1)无已知免疫缺陷的儿童(n = 31)和(2)接受免疫抑制治疗的儿童(n = 10)。所有参与者均在第0天和第7天在两个部位皮内注射Vero细胞培养狂犬病疫苗(RABIVAX - S)。在第28天、90天和180天使用基于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的方法评估血清抗狂犬病病毒糖蛋白抗体滴度。对滴度不足(≤0.5 EU/ml)的参与者给予加强剂量。

结果

到第28天,两组的血清转化率(SCR)均达到100%。在无已知免疫缺陷组和免疫抑制治疗组中,几何平均滴度(GMT)分别为2.168 EU/ml和1.547 EU/ml。在第90天,SCR分别为90%和70%,GMT分别为1.358 EU/ml和0.962 EU/ml。加强剂量使所有滴度不足的参与者的滴度恢复。注射部位疼痛是唯一报告的不良反应。

结论

2剂ID PrEP方案在儿科人群中具有免疫原性且安全,包括免疫抑制儿童。它在狂犬病流行地区提供了一种具有成本效益的替代方案,提高了依从性和可及性。

试验注册

在印度临床试验注册中心进行前瞻性注册,试验注册号为CTRI/2022/10/046777。

相似文献

1
Immunogenicity and safety of the accelerated 2-dose intradermal rabies pre exposure prophylaxis regimen in immunocompetent and immunocompromised pediatric populations: a comparative study.免疫功能正常和免疫功能低下的儿科人群中加速2剂皮内狂犬病暴露前预防方案的免疫原性和安全性:一项比较研究。
Infection. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02623-8.
2
Immunogenicity of pre-exposure rabies vaccination comparing number of doses and routes of administration: A systematic review and meta-analyses.比较剂量数和给药途径的暴露前狂犬病疫苗免疫原性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Vaccine. 2025 Apr 19;53:126878. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126878. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Safety and immunogenicity of a pentavalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine versus a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine in adults in India: an observer-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 2/3 study.在印度成年人中,五价脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗与四价脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项观察者盲法、随机、活性对照、2/3期研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Apr;25(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00576-0. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
4
Safety and immunogenicity of investigational tuberculosis vaccine M72/AS01 in people living with HIV in South Africa: an observer-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.研究性结核病疫苗M72/AS01在南非HIV感染者中的安全性和免疫原性:一项观察者盲法、随机、对照的2期试验。
Lancet HIV. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(25)00124-9.
5
Safety and immunogenicity of the Euvichol-S oral cholera vaccine for prevention of Vibrio cholerae O1 infection in Nepal: an observer-blind, active-controlled, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.Euvichol-S 口服霍乱疫苗预防尼泊尔 O1 群霍乱弧菌感染的安全性和免疫原性:一项观察者盲法、活性对照、随机、非劣效性、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 May;12(5):e826-e837. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00059-7.
6
Safety and immunogenicity of booster doses of an XBB.1.5 RBD subunit COVID-19 vaccine among individuals aged 5-80 years in India: a phase 3, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.印度5至80岁人群中XBB.1.5 RBD亚单位新冠疫苗加强剂量的安全性和免疫原性:一项3期、单盲、随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Jul 24;40:100642. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100642. eCollection 2025 Sep.
7
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
8
Immunogenicity and Safety of a Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine (MenACYW-TT) Administered with Routine Pediatric Vaccines: A European Randomized Controlled Trial.四价脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(MenACYW-TT)与常规儿科疫苗联合接种的免疫原性和安全性:一项欧洲随机对照试验。
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01190-7.
9
Safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dosing of a modified vaccinia Ankara-based vaccine against MERS-CoV in healthy adults: a phase 1b, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.基于安卡拉痘苗病毒的中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒疫苗在健康成年人中的安全性、免疫原性及最佳剂量:一项1b期双盲随机安慰剂对照临床试验
Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Feb;25(2):231-242. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00423-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
10
Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of the vaccine H56:IC31 in reducing the rate of tuberculosis disease recurrence in HIV-negative adults successfully treated for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial.疫苗H56:IC31在降低成功治疗药物敏感型肺结核的HIV阴性成人结核病复发率方面的免疫原性、安全性和疗效:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的2b期试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Jul;25(7):751-763. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00814-4. Epub 2025 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Immunogenicity of 2-dose pre-exposure rabies vaccine co-administered with quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children.两剂暴露前狂犬病疫苗与四价流感疫苗联合接种在儿童中的免疫原性
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;112:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.025. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Travel and immunosuppressant medication.旅行与免疫抑制剂药物。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar;49(3):88-92. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-11-19-5146.
3
Preexposure Intradermal Rabies Vaccination: A Noninferiority Trial in Healthy Adults on Shortening the Vaccination Schedule From 28 to 7 Days.
皮内狂犬病预防性疫苗接种:一项在健康成年人中缩短 28 天接种方案至 7 天的非劣效性试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 1;68(4):607-614. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy513.
4
Rabies antibody response after two intradermal pre-exposure prophylaxis immunizations: An observational cohort study.两剂皮内狂犬病预防暴露前免疫后的抗体反应:一项观察性队列研究。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2018 Mar-Apr;22:36-39. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis: a systematic review.暴露前狂犬病预防:一项系统评价
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Mar 1;95(3):210-219C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.173039. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
6
Rabies vaccinations: are abbreviated intradermal schedules the future?狂犬病疫苗接种:简化的皮内免疫程序是未来的趋势吗?
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;56(3):414-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis853. Epub 2012 Oct 5.