Egu Chinedu, Muscogliati Rodrigo, Nocun Weronika, Akil Hussein, U Saleh Wasse, Obidigbo Babajide, Aida Hakim Rebecca, A Quraishi Nasir, Salem Khalid, Najjar Elie
The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, NG7 2UH, Nottingham, UK.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09243-8.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a significant complication in spinal surgery, particularly in instrumented procedures, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and healthcare costs. Intraoperative wound irrigation (IWI) using antiseptic solutions such as povidone-iodine (PI) has been proposed as a preventive strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of PI irrigation against control interventions, in reducing postoperative SSIs and examines its effect on spinal fusion outcomes.
Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through March 2025. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PI irrigation to control interventions (saline or no irrigation) in adult spinal surgery were included. The primary outcome was overall SSI rate. Secondary outcomes included superficial and deep SSI rates, fusion rates, and adverse events. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.
Six RCTs involving 1,804 patients (901 PI group, 903 control group) were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in overall SSI with PI irrigation (0.77% vs. 6.0%; RR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.08-0.34; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%). Subgroup analyses showed significant reductions in both superficial (RR = 0.19; 95% CI: 0.07-0.52; P < 0.001) and deep SSIs (RR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.08-0.52; P = 0.0009), with absolute infection rates reduced from 2.9 to 0.33% and from 3.2 to 0.4%, respectively. Fusion rates were comparable between groups (RD = 0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-0.06; P = 0.10).
PI irrigation significantly lowers the risk of both superficial and deep SSIs in spinal surgery without negatively impacting fusion outcomes. These findings are based on Level I evidence and support the integration of PI irrigation into routine perioperative protocols as a low-cost, effective adjunct for infection prevention.
手术部位感染(SSIs)仍是脊柱手术中的一个重大并发症,尤其是在使用内固定器械的手术中,会导致发病率增加、住院时间延长和医疗费用上升。术中使用聚维酮碘(PI)等抗菌溶液进行伤口冲洗(IWI)已被提议作为一种预防策略。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了PI冲洗相对于对照干预措施在降低术后SSIs方面的疗效,并考察了其对脊柱融合效果的影响。
按照PRISMA指南,截至2025年3月对Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面检索。仅纳入比较PI冲洗与成人脊柱手术对照干预措施(生理盐水或不冲洗)的随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要结局是总体SSI发生率。次要结局包括浅表和深部SSI发生率、融合率和不良事件。使用随机效应模型汇总数据,并使用I²统计量评估异质性。
纳入了6项RCTs,涉及1804例患者(PI组901例,对照组903例)。汇总分析表明,PI冲洗显著降低了总体SSI发生率(0.77%对6.0%;RR = 0.16,95%CI:0.08 - 0.34;P < 0.00001;I² = 0%)。亚组分析显示浅表(RR = 0.19;95%CI:0.07 - 0.52;P < 0.001)和深部SSIs(RR = 0.21;95%CI:0.08 - 0.52;P = 0.0009)均显著降低,绝对感染率分别从2.9%降至0.33%和从3.2%降至0.4%。两组间融合率相当(RD = 0.03;95%CI:0.00 - 0.06;P = 0.10)。
PI冲洗显著降低了脊柱手术中浅表和深部SSIs的风险,且对融合效果没有负面影响。这些发现基于I级证据,支持将PI冲洗作为一种低成本、有效的感染预防辅助手段纳入常规围手术期方案。