Suppr超能文献

病灶指数:一种对急性呼吸窘迫综合征COVID-19患者进行形态学亚表型分析的定量方法:一项初步研究。

The focal index: a quantitative approach to morphological sub-phenotyping of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pilot study.

作者信息

Bjarnadottir Kristin Jona, Tovedal Martin, Perchiazzi Gaetano, Lipcsey Miklos, Covaciu Lucian, von Seth Magnus, Kawati Rafael, Pellegrini Mariangela

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Hedenstierna Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Ing 40, 3 tr, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Aug 8;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00794-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterised by significant morphological heterogeneity. Morphological sub-phenotyping can potentially be used to personalise mechanical ventilation. Current methods to classify lung injury as focal or diffuse rely on subjective image interpretation, which risks misclassification and suboptimal treatment. This study aimed to investigate the morphological appearance features of lung injury objectively. The focal index, an objective quantitative tool, was introduced to assess focality in lung injury.

METHODS

In this single-centre retrospective study, we included lung computed tomography (CT) scans from COVID-19 ARDS patients on invasive mechanical ventilation, classified as diffuse lung injury. CT data were analysed to extract regional Hounsfield Unit (HU) profiles across nine predefined lung areas. The focal index was derived by quantifying the non-overlapping area under HU distribution curves between the apical ventral and diaphragmatic dorsal regions. Correlations with lung weight, gas volume, and ventilatory settings were assessed. For validation, at least two experienced ICU consultants assessed the same images and determined whether ARDS was of a diffuse or focal type. The experts classified 36 out of 37 patients as diffuse ARDS, with substantial interobserver agreement (k = 0.65, 95% CI 0.02-1.00).

RESULTS

The focal index demonstrated a wide range (25-175; mean 95.5 ± standard deviation 42.8), correlating significantly with the dorsal diaphragmatic non-aerated area (r = 0.67, p < 0.01) and with total gas volume (r = - 0.36, p = 0.03). There was no significant influence of ventilatory settings on the focal index.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis suggested diffuse lung injury includes a spectrum of focality rather than a binary classification. The focal index provides an objective method to quantify the focality of lung injury in ARDS. Further studies are needed to validate the focal index across diverse ARDS aetiologies and establish its clinical application threshold for guiding personalised ventilation strategies.

摘要

背景

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)具有显著的形态学异质性。形态学亚表型分析有可能用于机械通气的个体化治疗。目前将肺损伤分类为局灶性或弥漫性的方法依赖于主观的图像解读,这存在分类错误和治疗欠佳的风险。本研究旨在客观地探究肺损伤的形态学外观特征。引入了局灶指数这一客观定量工具来评估肺损伤的局灶性。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们纳入了接受有创机械通气的COVID-19 ARDS患者的肺部计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,这些患者被归类为弥漫性肺损伤。对CT数据进行分析,以提取九个预定义肺区域的区域亨氏单位(HU)曲线。通过量化尖腹侧和膈背侧区域之间HU分布曲线下的非重叠面积得出局灶指数。评估其与肺重量、气体体积和通气设置的相关性。为进行验证,至少两名经验丰富的重症监护病房会诊医生评估相同的图像,并确定ARDS是弥漫性还是局灶性类型。专家们将37例患者中的36例分类为弥漫性ARDS,观察者间一致性良好(k = 0.65,95% CI 0.02 - 1.00)。

结果

局灶指数范围较宽(25 - 175;平均值95.5 ± 标准差42.8),与膈背侧无气区域显著相关(r = 0.67,p < ⁰.⁰¹),与总气体体积显著相关(r = - ⁰.³⁶,p = ⁰.⁰³)。通气设置对局灶指数无显著影响。

结论

分析表明弥漫性肺损伤包括一系列局灶性情况,而非二元分类。局灶指数提供了一种客观方法来量化ARDS中肺损伤的局灶性。需要进一步研究以在不同病因的ARDS中验证局灶指数,并确定其用于指导个体化通气策略的临床应用阈值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f267/12334779/666c35a670ff/40635_2025_794_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验