• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同高度沙障围栏对沙漠公路防护效益的评价

Evaluation of protection benefit of sand barrier fence with different heights on desert highway.

作者信息

Zhang Ming, Li Qi, Hou Jiayin, Ji Shuai

机构信息

Gansu Engineering Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd, Lanzhou, China.

School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0324869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324869. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324869
PMID:40779541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12334077/
Abstract

As the first barrier of desert highway protection, sand-blocking fence is very important to the safety of the line. Based on the background of Wuma Expressway, this paper uses CFD numerical simulation to study the wind and sand-blocking effect of sand-blocking fence with different heights. The results show that: (1) Between the first and second sand-blocking fences, when the height of sand-blocking fence is 2m, 2.5m, 3.0m and 3.5m, the wind speed near the surface (0.1m ~ 0.3m) is reduced by 87% ~ 97% of the initial wind speed. Between the second and third sand-blocking fences, when the height of sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the increase of wind speed is 13.87% lower than that of 2m height. The decrease is the largest, and sand particles are easy to deposit here in large quantities. When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. After the height is increased to 3.5m, the thickness of the sand is no longer increased. (4) The height of sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, and the area of sand at the top of embankment is obviously reduced. The area of sand volume fraction 0.55-0.6 is 73.44% lower than that of 2m sand-blocking fence, and the effect of wind and sand prevention is the best.

摘要

作为沙漠公路防护的第一道屏障,阻沙栅栏对线路安全至关重要。本文以乌玛高速公路为背景,采用CFD数值模拟方法研究不同高度阻沙栅栏的防风阻沙效果。结果表明:(1)在第一和第二道阻沙栅栏之间,当阻沙栅栏高度为2m、2.5m、3.0m和3.5m时,近地表(0.1m~0.3m)风速降低了初始风速的87%~97%。在第二和第三道阻沙栅栏之间,当阻沙栅栏高度为2.5m时,风速增加量比2m高度时低13.87%。降幅最大,沙粒容易大量在此沉积。当高度为2.5m及以上时,防风效率大于90%,防风效果显著提高。(2)阻沙栅栏高度变化对第二和第三道沙障之间的防风效率有显著影响。(3)在三道阻沙栅栏中,当阻沙栅栏高度为2.5m时,积沙厚度比2m高的阻沙栅栏厚50.51%和58.33%,阻沙效果最显著。高度增加到3.5m后,积沙厚度不再增加。(4)阻沙栅栏高度为2.5m时,路堤顶部积沙面积明显减小。沙体积分数0.55 - 0.6的区域面积比2m阻沙栅栏低73.44%,风沙防治效果最佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/77cf17101503/pone.0324869.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/f63dedf359d9/pone.0324869.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/4583a3acd7d9/pone.0324869.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/d7e68ed05bf4/pone.0324869.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/c0ba16be1f9f/pone.0324869.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/77cf17101503/pone.0324869.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/f63dedf359d9/pone.0324869.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/4583a3acd7d9/pone.0324869.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/d7e68ed05bf4/pone.0324869.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/c0ba16be1f9f/pone.0324869.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c3/12334077/77cf17101503/pone.0324869.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of protection benefit of sand barrier fence with different heights on desert highway.不同高度沙障围栏对沙漠公路防护效益的评价
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0324869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324869. eCollection 2025.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Synchronous field measurement of high energy sand saltation on typical desert surfaces, Alxa plateau.阿拉善高原典型沙漠表面高能沙跃移的同步野外测量
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05617-6.
5
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal array of sand fences.最优沙障排列。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 24;7:45148. doi: 10.1038/srep45148.