Suppr超能文献

皮肤科中的放大镜:一项个人调查。

Magnifiers in dermatology: a personal survey.

作者信息

Epstein E

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985 Oct;13(4):687-98. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70212-5.

Abstract

Most dermatologists find some type of magnifying system useful in their practice. Over a period of 15 years, I evaluated magnifiers ranging from simple low-power, single-lens systems to a Zeiss operating microscope. This report reviews the various types of magnifiers available for examining the skin's surface and describes their optical characteristics. For the dermatologist a binocular loupe with magnification of 3X to 4X appears to be the most useful diagnostic magnifying device. Higher magnifications failed to yield additional clinically useful detail. Lower-power binocular magnifiers of 2X to 2.5X, although useful as a surgical aid, provided less-than-optimal magnification for diagnostic purposes. The ideal magnifier for each practitioner will depend on subjective needs, as well as optical characteristics. Currently available magnifiers are described and evaluated.

摘要

大多数皮肤科医生发现在他们的临床实践中某种类型的放大系统很有用。在15年的时间里,我评估了从简单的低倍单镜头系统到蔡司手术显微镜等各种放大镜。本报告回顾了可用于检查皮肤表面的各类放大镜,并描述了它们的光学特性。对于皮肤科医生来说,放大倍数为3倍至4倍的双目放大镜似乎是最有用的诊断放大设备。更高的放大倍数未能产生更多临床上有用的细节。2倍至2.5倍的低倍双目放大镜虽然作为手术辅助工具很有用,但用于诊断目的时放大倍数不太理想。每位从业者的理想放大镜将取决于主观需求以及光学特性。本文对目前可用的放大镜进行了描述和评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验