• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Frequency and intensity discrimination in human infants and adults.

作者信息

Sinnott J M, Aslin R N

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Dec;78(6):1986-92. doi: 10.1121/1.392655.

DOI:10.1121/1.392655
PMID:4078175
Abstract

Frequency and intensity DLs were measured in 26 human infants (ages 7-9 months) and six young adults using a repeating standard "yes-no" operant headturning technique and an adaptive staircase (tracking) psychophysical procedure. Subjects were visually reinforced for responding to frequency increments, frequency decrements, intensity increments, or intensity decrements in an ongoing train of 1.0-kHz tone bursts, and stimulus control was monitored using randomly interleaved probe and catch trials. Infants were easily conditioned to respond to both increments and decrements in frequency, and DLs ranged from 11-29 Hz, while adult DLs ranged from 3-5 Hz. Infants also easily discriminated intensity increments, and DLs ranged from 3-12 dB, while adult DLs ranged from 1-2 dB. No infants successfully discriminated intensity decrements, although adults experienced no difficulty with this task and produced DLs similar to those for increments. The apparent inability of infants to discriminate intensity decrements suggests that the infant CNS may not be well adapted to monitor rate decreases in populations of peripheral auditory neurons.

摘要

相似文献

1
Frequency and intensity discrimination in human infants and adults.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Dec;78(6):1986-92. doi: 10.1121/1.392655.
2
Frequency and intensity discrimination in humans and monkeys.人类和猴子的频率与强度辨别
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Dec;78(6):1977-85. doi: 10.1121/1.392654.
3
Discrimination of frequency transitions by human infants.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Aug;86(2):582-90. doi: 10.1121/1.398237.
4
Infants' detection of increments in low- and high-frequency noise.
Percept Psychophys. 1998 Aug;60(6):1044-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03211938.
5
Sound intensity processing by the goldfish.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Oct;78(4):1296-309. doi: 10.1121/1.392899.
6
Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention.听觉变化检测和注意力的非自愿控制基于两种不同的机制。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 10;1077(1):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.043. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
7
Sensitivity of auditory-nerve fibers to changes in intensity: a dichotomy between decrements and increments.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Oct;78(4):1310-6. doi: 10.1121/1.392900.
8
A Comparison of Pure Tone Auditory Thresholds in Human Infants and Adults.人类婴儿与成人纯音听觉阈值的比较。
Infant Behav Dev. 1983 Jan;6(1):3-17. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(83)80003-4.
9
The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.视觉任务难度和注意方向对以失配负波为指标的听觉变化检测的影响。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):112-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.125. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
10
Age-related differences in discrimination of an interval separating onsets of successive tone bursts as a function of interval duration.作为间隔持续时间的函数,在区分连续音爆起始之间的间隔时与年龄相关的差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul;122(1):458-66. doi: 10.1121/1.2739409.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental auditory deprivation in one ear impairs brainstem binaural processing and reduces spatial hearing acuity.单耳的发育性听觉剥夺会损害脑干双耳处理能力并降低空间听力敏锐度。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Sep 5;23(9):e3003337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003337. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Let's See If You Can Hear: The Effect of Stimulus Type and Intensity to Pupil Diameter Response in Infants and Adults.让我们看看你是否能听见:刺激类型和强度对婴儿及成人瞳孔直径反应的影响。
Ear Hear. 2025;46(4):1111-1124. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001651. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Humans can use positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations to detect rising and falling pitch.
人类可以利用频谱时间上的正相关和负相关来检测音高的上升和下降。
bioRxiv. 2024 Nov 21:2024.08.03.606481. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.03.606481.
4
Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.婴儿在言语声音分选中对孤立和组合时间线索的使用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Jul;148(1):401. doi: 10.1121/10.0001582.
5
Infants use onset asynchrony cues in auditory scene analysis.婴儿在听觉场景分析中使用起始时间差线索。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Oct;144(4):2052. doi: 10.1121/1.5058397.
6
Pure-Tone Frequency Discrimination in Preschoolers, Young School-Age Children, and Adults.学龄前儿童、低龄学童和成年人的纯音频率辨别
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Sep 19;61(9):2440-2445. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0445.
7
Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.人类的听觉距离感知:线索、发展、神经基础及感觉丧失的影响综述
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Feb;78(2):373-95. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1015-1.
8
Development of the auditory system.听觉系统的发育。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:55-72. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00003-2.
9
Revisiting vocal perception in non-human animals: a review of vowel discrimination, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization.重新审视非人类动物的语音感知:元音辨别、说话者语音识别和说话者归一化综述
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 13;5:1543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01543. eCollection 2014.
10
Factors affecting sensitivity to frequency change in school-age children and adults.影响学龄儿童和成年人对频率变化敏感度的因素。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Oct;57(5):1972-82. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0254.