Guţu Robert, Schaps Valerie, Wachtler Benjamin, Beese Florian, Hoebel Jens, Alibone Marco, Wahrendorf Morten
Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 Sep 1;51(5):380-393. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4242. Epub 2025 Aug 9.
Occupational differences in COVID-19 are well documented, but the empirical evidence on potential reasons for these differences remains limited. Possible reasons include pre-existing health conditions. This study investigated occupational differences in COVID-19 disease severity and whether they can be attributed to pre-existing health conditions.
Our study used German health insurance data covering 3.17 million insured individuals (age 18-67 years), with details on COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality in 2020 and 2021, information on occupation (regrouped into four classifications) and pre-existing health conditions (divided into seven disease groups). In addition to descriptive statistics, we estimated multivariable Cox regression models with varying sets of adjustments.
We found clear occupational differences in COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality, with the highest risks for the production sector (especially manufacturing), commercial services (especially cleaning) and for low-skilled occupations. These findings persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and region, and also after mutual adjustment for other occupational classifications. We also found some evidence that the association between occupation and disease severity was partly explained by pre-existing conditions, especially in the case of low skill levels.
Our findings provide support for occupational differences in COVID-19, where the occupational classifications under study were independently related to risk differences (eg, skill-level and job sector). Furthermore, we provide empirical evidence that differences by occupational skill levels are partly due to pre-existing conditions. This finding suggests that occupational inequalities in health increased during the pandemic, with those with poorer health who worked in disadvantaged occupations also being more likely to experience severe COVID-19 outcomes.
新冠病毒病(COVID-19)的职业差异已有充分记录,但关于这些差异潜在原因的实证证据仍然有限。可能的原因包括既往健康状况。本研究调查了COVID-19疾病严重程度的职业差异,以及这些差异是否可归因于既往健康状况。
我们的研究使用了德国医疗保险数据,涵盖317万参保个体(年龄在18 - 67岁之间),包含2020年和2021年与COVID-19相关的住院和死亡细节、职业信息(重新划分为四类)以及既往健康状况(分为七个疾病组)。除描述性统计外,我们估计了具有不同调整集的多变量Cox回归模型。
我们发现COVID-19住院和死亡存在明显的职业差异,生产部门(尤其是制造业)、商业服务(尤其是清洁行业)以及低技能职业的风险最高。在对年龄、性别和地区进行调整后,以及在对其他职业分类进行相互调整后,这些发现依然存在。我们还发现一些证据表明,职业与疾病严重程度之间的关联部分可由既往状况解释,尤其是在低技能水平的情况下。
我们的研究结果支持COVID-19存在职业差异,其中所研究的职业分类与风险差异(如技能水平和工作部门)独立相关。此外,我们提供了实证证据表明职业技能水平差异部分归因于既往状况。这一发现表明,在大流行期间健康方面的职业不平等加剧,那些健康状况较差且从事弱势职业的人也更有可能出现严重的COVID-19后果。