• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review.职业与 SARS-CoV-2 在欧洲:综述。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Sep 18;33(173). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2024. Print 2024 Jul.
2
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
3
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub3.
4
Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection.估计接触感染或疾病的美国工人的负担:控制 COVID-19 感染风险的关键因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232452. eCollection 2020.
5
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub2.
6
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
7
Occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide register-based study of the Danish workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020-2021.职业性感染 SARS-CoV-2 的风险:2020-2021 年 COVID-19 大流行期间丹麦劳动力的全国性基于登记的研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Apr;80(4):202-208. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108713. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
8
Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis.与英国医疗保健工作者多民族队列中 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的风险因素(UK-REACH):一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004015. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Quantification of Occupational and Community Risk Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity Among Health Care Workers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.量化大型美国医疗保健系统中卫生保健工作者 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性的职业和社区风险因素。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):649-654. doi: 10.7326/M20-7145. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
10
Risk factors for COVID-19 among Californians working outside the home, November 2020 - May 2021.2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 5 月期间加利福尼亚州外出工作人群中 COVID-19 的风险因素。
Am J Ind Med. 2023 Mar;66(3):233-242. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23459. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Can pre-existing medical conditions explain occupational differences in COVID-19 disease severity? An analysis of 3.17 million people insured in Germany.既往存在的健康状况能否解释新冠病毒病严重程度的职业差异?对德国317万参保人员的分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 Sep 1;51(5):380-393. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4242. Epub 2025 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential contribution of vaccination uptake to occupational differences in risk of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey.疫苗接种率对SARS-CoV-2感染风险职业差异的潜在影响:英国国家统计局COVID-19感染调查分析
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Dec 12;81(1):34-9. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108931.
2
Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries.职业来源的 COVID-19 识别:欧洲国家之间的比较。
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Nov 23;80(12):694-701. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108726.
3
A COVID-19 Outbreak in a Large Meat-Processing Plant in England: Transmission Risk Factors and Controls.英国一家大型肉类加工厂发生的 COVID-19 疫情:传播风险因素和控制措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 22;20(19):6806. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20196806.
4
how these findings canPublic transport: lessons learned by the sector through the COVID-19 pandemic.公共交通:该领域在 COVID-19 大流行期间吸取的教训。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1904. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16062-3.
5
Occupational risks associated with severe COVID-19 disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection - a Swedish national case-control study conducted from October 2020 to December 2021.与严重 COVID-19 疾病和 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的职业风险 - 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月期间进行的瑞典全国病例对照研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Sep 1;49(6):386-394. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4103. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
6
Excess mortality among essential workers in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic: an updated analysis.新冠疫情期间英格兰和威尔士关键岗位工作人员的超额死亡率:最新分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Aug;77(8):481-484. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-220391. Epub 2023 May 31.
7
Between-occupation differences in work-related COVID-19 mitigation strategies over time: Analysis of the Virus Watch Cohort in England and Wales.不同职业间与工作相关的 COVID-19 缓解策略随时间的变化差异:对英格兰和威尔士病毒观察队列的分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Jul 1;49(5):350-362. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4092. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
8
COVID-19 Risk by Workers' Occupation and Industry in the United States, 2020‒2021.2020-2021 年美国不同职业和行业工人的 COVID-19 风险。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Jun;113(6):647-656. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307249. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
9
The importance of occupation in the development of the COVID-19 pandemic.职业在新冠疫情发展中的重要性。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 May 1;49(4):231-233. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4094. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
Occupational inequalities in the prevalence of COVID-19: A longitudinal observational study of England, August 2020 to January 2021.职业不平等与 COVID-19 患病率:2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 1 月期间英格兰的纵向观察研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283119. eCollection 2023.

职业与 SARS-CoV-2 在欧洲:综述。

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review.

机构信息

Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Sep 18;33(173). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2024. Print 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1183/16000617.0044-2024
PMID:39293853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409055/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Workplace features such as ventilation, temperature and the extent of contact are all likely to relate to personal risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Occupations relating to healthcare, social care, education, transport and food production and retail are thought to have increased risks, but the extent to which these risks are elevated and how they have varied over time is unclear.

METHODS

We searched for population cohort studies conducted in Europe that compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes between two or more different occupational groups. Data were extracted on relative differences between occupational groups, split into four time-periods corresponding to pandemic waves.

RESULTS

We included data from 17 studies. 11 studies used SARS-CoV-2 as their outcome measure and six used COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality. During waves one and two, the majority of studies saw elevated risks in the five groups that we looked at. Only seven studies used data from wave three onwards. Elevated risks were observed in waves three and four for social care and education workers in some studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence relating to occupational differences in COVID-19 outcomes in Europe largely focuses on the early part of the pandemic. There is consistent evidence that the direction and magnitude of differences varied with time. Workers in the healthcare, transport and food production sectors saw highly elevated risks in the early part of the pandemic in the majority of studies but this did not appear to continue. There was evidence that elevated risks of infection in the education and social care sectors may have persisted.

摘要

简介

工作场所的特征,如通风、温度和接触程度,都可能与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的个人风险有关。与医疗保健、社会关怀、教育、交通以及食品生产和零售相关的职业被认为风险增加,但这些风险的程度以及它们随时间的变化尚不清楚。

方法

我们搜索了在欧洲进行的人群队列研究,这些研究比较了两个或多个不同职业群体之间的 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)结局。提取了关于职业群体之间相对差异的数据,分为四个与大流行波相对应的时期。

结果

我们纳入了 17 项研究。11 项研究将 SARS-CoV-2 作为其结局指标,6 项研究将 COVID-19 住院和死亡率作为结局指标。在第一波和第二波中,我们研究的五个群体中,大多数研究发现风险升高。只有 7 项研究使用了第三波以后的数据。在一些研究中,第三波和第四波时社会关怀和教育工作者的风险升高。

结论

与欧洲 COVID-19 结局职业差异相关的证据主要集中在大流行的早期阶段。有一致的证据表明,差异的方向和幅度随时间而变化。在大多数研究中,医疗保健、交通和食品生产部门的工作人员在大流行早期看到了极高的风险,但这种情况似乎并没有持续下去。有证据表明,教育和社会关怀部门感染风险升高可能持续存在。