Gim Jimin, Park Jiwon, Kim Sun
Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, 17F, 700 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada.
Health Right Network, 3F, 35, Cheongpa-Ro 103-Gil, Jung-Gu, Seoul, 04507, South Korea.
Global Health. 2025 Aug 9;21(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01134-3.
During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the South Korean government initiated the Global Vaccine Hub Project (GVHP) purportedly to address global vaccine inequality. This study analyzes the strategies and underlying epistemology of GVHP through the perspective of global governmentality. Critical Discourse Study (CDS) approaches were used to identify governmental technologies and explain how their embedded knowledge is related to power relations.
The findings reveal that GVHP merely pursues national interests by implementing governmental technologies, such as calculative practice, support to private companies, patent protection and circumvention, and pursuing vaccine diplomacy. The South Korean government considered the pandemic an economic and diplomatic opportunity to become an advanced country. The governmental strategies resulted in the depoliticization of vaccines and facilitated the government's opposition to other alternatives, such as an intellectual property waiver at the World Trade Organization level.
This study argues that the failure of global pandemic governance does not imply the failure of global governmentality; rather, the success of neoliberal global governmentality made global solidarity challenging.
在2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间,韩国政府启动了全球疫苗中心项目(GVHP),据称是为了解决全球疫苗不平等问题。本研究从全球治理的角度分析了GVHP的策略及其潜在的认识论。采用批判性话语研究(CDS)方法来识别政府治理技术,并解释其内在知识与权力关系是如何相关的。
研究结果表明,GVHP只是通过实施政府治理技术来追求国家利益,如计算性实践、对私营公司的支持、专利保护与规避以及推行疫苗外交。韩国政府将疫情视为成为发达国家的经济和外交机遇。这些政府策略导致了疫苗的去政治化,并促使政府反对其他替代方案,例如在世界贸易组织层面放弃知识产权。
本研究认为,全球大流行治理的失败并不意味着全球治理的失败;相反,新自由主义全球治理的成功使得全球团结面临挑战。