Murphy Maureen, Paul Emanuela, Siebert Sara, Elie Jean Prosper
The Global Women's Institute, George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA.
Beyond Borders/Depase Fwontyè yo, Norristown Pennsylvania and Nan Jozen, Haiti.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):2720. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24033-z.
Though there are a growing number of programs seeking to prevent violence against women and children, adolescent girls often fall into a gap between these approaches. This article focuses on the impact of a violence prevention program, Rethinking Power, on the lives and wellbeing girls and young women aged 10-23.
The study utilized a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods design. The results focus on data collected with girls and young women (N = 1,627) who were of adolescent age during program implementation. A difference-in-difference approach explored the impact of the program on key outcomes using cross-sectional data from three timepoints. A survey of girls' groups participants was also undertaken (N = 752) and qualitative data was collected with adolescents and community stakeholders (52 focus groups and 61 interviews). Regression was utilized to analyze girls' group data and thematic analysis to analyze qualitative data. Data for mixed methods analysis was brought together using a convergent approach.
The results show girls and young women the intervention areas reported less experiences of physical or sexual IPV in the past 12 months over time (from 25.7% at baseline to 15.7% at endline) and reduced, though non-significant due to small samples, odds of experiencing IPV compared to the controls (OR: 0.78; p = .51). Qualitative data also showed changes in violence, acceptance of violence and gender attitudes. Girls and young women in the intervention area (rather than control) had more than twice the odds of reporting that they could choose who to be friends with (OR: 2.59; p = .047) and had greater odds of agreeing that girls should be allowed to socialize just as boys (OR: 3.87; p <.001) and that a man should not have the final word at home (OR: 1.94; p = .019). Participants in girls' groups saw improvements on indicators related to gender attitudes, acceptance of violence, self-esteem and agency.
While not all results are statistically significant due to small sample sizes, they suggest that girl-focused programming, alongside a wider community-change process, can improve the lives of adolescent girls.
The full trial was retrospectively registered in ISRCTN (ISRCTN12311597) on April 4th, 2024.
尽管越来越多的项目致力于预防针对妇女和儿童的暴力行为,但少女往往处于这些方法的空白地带。本文重点关注预防暴力项目“重新思考权力”对10至23岁女孩和年轻女性的生活及福祉的影响。
该研究采用了准实验性混合方法设计。结果聚焦于在项目实施期间处于青春期的女孩和年轻女性(N = 1,627)所收集的数据。差异-in-差异方法使用来自三个时间点的横断面数据探讨了该项目对关键结果的影响。还对女孩群体参与者进行了一项调查(N = 752),并与青少年和社区利益相关者收集了定性数据(52个焦点小组和61次访谈)。使用回归分析女孩群体数据,使用主题分析分析定性数据。混合方法分析的数据使用收敛方法汇总在一起。
结果显示,随着时间的推移,干预地区的女孩和年轻女性报告在过去12个月中遭受身体或性亲密伴侣暴力的经历减少(从基线时的25.7%降至终线时的15.7%),与对照组相比,遭受亲密伴侣暴力的几率有所降低,尽管由于样本量小而不显著(OR:0.78;p = 0.51)。定性数据还显示了暴力、对暴力的接受程度和性别态度的变化。干预地区的女孩和年轻女性报告她们可以选择与谁交朋友的几率是对照组的两倍多(OR:2.59;p = 0.047),并且更有可能同意女孩应该像男孩一样社交(OR:3.87;p < 0.001)以及男性在家中不应有最终决定权(OR:1.94;p = 0.019)。女孩群体的参与者在与性别态度、对暴力的接受程度、自尊和能动性相关的指标上有所改善。
尽管由于样本量小并非所有结果都具有统计学意义,但它们表明以女孩为重点的项目,连同更广泛的社区变革过程,可以改善少女的生活。
完整试验于2024年4月4日在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN12311597)中进行了回顾性注册。