Carter-Bawa Lisa, Lafata Jennifer Elston, Slaven James E, Monahan Patrick O, Vielma Ana Guadalupe, Wernli Karen J, Brandzel Susan, Gao Hongyuan, Rawl Susan M
Center for Discovery & Innovation at Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, USA; Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Nov;140:109303. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109303. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
Shared decision-making (SDM) is critical in lung cancer screening (LCS), enabling clinicians to guide patients through complex benefit-risk discussions. Despite its endorsement by professional organizations and its Medicare reimbursement requirement, SDM implementation in clinical practice remains inconsistent. This cross-sectional study evaluated factors influencing clinician knowledge, attitudes, and referral behaviors regarding LCS within a decentralized screening program.
We surveyed 125 primary care clinicians (PCCs) in a large integrated health system, linking responses to electronic health record data to assess LCS referral propensity. Clinicians reported perceived barriers to SDM, attitudes toward SDM and LCS, and knowledge via clinical vignettes. Multivariable analyses identified key predictors of attitudes and behaviors.
Findings revealed that perceived barriers to SDM, particularly time burden, significantly influenced attitudes toward LCS (β = -0.334, p < 0.001) and referral propensity (β = -0.305, p = 0.0005). Formal training in SDM for LCS was positively associated with favorable SDM attitudes (β = 0.035, p = 0.0248), emphasizing the potential of targeted interventions. Time burden emerged as a critical determinant of perceived barriers (β = 0.728, p < 0.001), highlighting the need for systemic and educational solutions.
These results underscore the importance of reducing SDM-related time burdens and enhancing training to improve clinician engagement and screening outcomes. Innovative strategies, such as patient-tailored pre-visit education and team-based care models, could mitigate barriers and promote more effective SDM implementation. Future research should explore longitudinal and multi-system analyses to refine interventions and optimize LCS processes.
By addressing systemic and individual barriers, health systems can enhance SDM efficacy, increasing LCS uptake and improving care for screening-eligible populations. This study offers actionable insights for advancing patient-centered approaches in LCS and broader preventive health initiatives.
共同决策(SDM)在肺癌筛查(LCS)中至关重要,能使临床医生在复杂的获益-风险讨论中为患者提供指导。尽管得到了专业组织的认可且有医疗保险报销要求,但SDM在临床实践中的实施仍不一致。这项横断面研究评估了在分散式筛查项目中影响临床医生关于LCS的知识、态度和转诊行为的因素。
我们对一个大型综合医疗系统中的125名初级保健临床医生(PCC)进行了调查,将他们的回答与电子健康记录数据相联系,以评估LCS转诊倾向。临床医生通过临床案例报告了他们感知到的SDM障碍、对SDM和LCS的态度以及知识。多变量分析确定了态度和行为的关键预测因素。
研究结果显示,感知到的SDM障碍,尤其是时间负担,对LCS态度(β = -0.334,p < 0.001)和转诊倾向(β = -0.305,p = 0.0005)有显著影响。针对LCS的SDM正式培训与积极的SDM态度呈正相关(β = 0.035,p = 0.0248),强调了有针对性干预措施的潜力。时间负担成为感知障碍的关键决定因素(β = 0.728,p < 0.001),凸显了系统性和教育性解决方案的必要性。
这些结果强调了减少与SDM相关的时间负担以及加强培训以提高临床医生参与度和筛查结果的重要性。创新策略,如针对患者的就诊前教育和基于团队的护理模式,可以减轻障碍并促进更有效的SDM实施。未来的研究应探索纵向和多系统分析,以完善干预措施并优化LCS流程。
通过解决系统性和个体障碍,医疗系统可以提高SDM的效果,增加LCS的接受度,并改善对符合筛查条件人群的护理。本研究为在LCS及更广泛的预防性健康倡议中推进以患者为中心的方法提供了可操作的见解。