Suppr超能文献

临床实践中使用的丁型肝炎病毒核糖核酸(HDV-RNA)定量检测方法的诊断性能比较:一项全国质量控制多中心研究的结果

Comparison of diagnostic performances of HDV-RNA quantification assays used in clinical practice: Results from a national quality control multicenter study.

作者信息

Salpini Romina, Piermatteo Lorenzo, Caviglia Gian Paolo, Bertoli Ada, Brunetto Maurizia Rossana, Bruzzone Bianca, Callegaro Annapaola, Caudai Cinzia, Cavallone Daniela, Chessa Luchino, Coghe Fernando, Coppola Nicola, Cuomo Nunzia, D'Anna Stefano, Di Stefano Mariantonietta, Facchetti Floriana, Farina Claudio, Ferraro Donatella, Franchin Elisa, Francisci Daniela, Galli Silvia, Garbuglia Anna Rosa, Gennari William, Ghisetti Valeria, Lampertico Pietro, Lo Caputo Sergio, Marascio Nadia, Menzo Stefano, Micheli Valeria, Niro Grazia Anna, Olivero Antonella, Paba Pierpaolo, Palermo Concetta Ilenia, Palmieri Orazio, Paolucci Stefania, Pisaturo Mariantonietta, Pollicino Teresa, Raffa Giuseppina, Santantonio Teresa, Torre Giulia, Turriziani Ombretta, Uzzau Sergio, Uceda Renteria Sara Colonia, Vatteroni Marialinda, Zazzi Maurizio, Craxì Antonio, Ceccherini-Silberstein Francesca, Svicher Valentina, Arosio Marco, Bastianelli Sabrina, Gentile Annamaria, Giardina Federica A M, Gidari Anna, Govoni Rosalba, Ibba Gabriele, Loglio Alessandro, Lombardi Alessandra, Mascarella Chiara, Maggi Fabrizio, Matera Giovanni, Mazzei Chiara, Milia Maria Grazia, Quirino Angela, Raddi Adriana, Scioscia Rosetta, Tagliazucchi Sara, Totaro Michele, Valaperta Rea

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2025 Oct;180:105850. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105850. Epub 2025 Aug 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A reliable quantification of hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA is of paramount importance for monitoring patients under antiviral therapy. This quality control study compares the diagnostic performances of quantitative HDV-RNA assays used in clinical practice.

METHODS

Two HDV-RNA sample panels were quantified in 30 centers by RoboGene (N = 9 laboratories), EurobioPlex (N = 7), RealStar (N = 4), AltoStar (N = 1), Bosphore (N = 3), Bosphore-on-InGenius (N = 1), Dia.Pro (N = 2), Nuclear-Laser-Medicine (N = 1) and 3 in-house assays. Panel A and B comprised 8 serial dilutions of WHO/HDV standard (range: 0.5-5.0 log10 IU/ml) and 20 clinical samples (range: 0.5-6.0 log10 IU/ml), respectively. The following parameters were determined: sensitivity by 95 % LOD (limit of detection), precision by intra- and inter-run CV (coefficient of variation), accuracy by the differences between expected-observed HDV-RNA, linearity by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

95 % LOD varied across assays and centers underlining heterogeneous sensitivities: AltoStar had the lowest 95 % LOD (3 IU/ml) followed by RealStar (10 [min-max: 3-316] IU/ml), Bosphore-on-InGenius (10 IU/ml), RoboGene (31 [3-316] IU/ml), Nuclear-Laser-Medicine (31 IU/ml) and EuroBioplex (100 [100-316] IU/ml). Moreover, 6 assays (RoboGene, EurobioPlex, RealStar, AltoStar, Nuclear-Laser-Medicine and In-house) showed <0.5 log10 IU/ml differences between expected and observed HDV-RNA for all dilutions while other assays had >1 log10 IU/ml underestimations. RealStar, Bosphore-on-InGenius and EurobioPlex had the highest precision (mean intra-run CV < 20 %). Inter-run CV was higher for all assays, with CVs < 25 % for RealStar, AltoStar, Nuclear-Laser-Medicine and EurobioPlex. Seven assays (RoboGene/AltoStar/RealStar/EurobioPlex/Nuclear-Laser-Medicine/In-house) showed a good linearity (R > 0.90), but for HDV-RNA < 1000 IU/ml only Bosphore-on-InGenius, AltoStar, RealStar and Robogene showed a R > 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines heterogeneous sensitivities (inter- and intraassays), that could hamper proper HDV-RNA quantification, particularly at low viral loads. This raises the need to improve the diagnostic performance of most assays for properly identifying virological response to anti-HDV drugs.

摘要

引言

对丁型肝炎病毒(HDV)RNA进行可靠定量对于监测接受抗病毒治疗的患者至关重要。这项质量控制研究比较了临床实践中使用的定量HDV-RNA检测方法的诊断性能。

方法

两个HDV-RNA样本板在30个中心进行定量检测,这些中心包括RoboGene(9个实验室)、EurobioPlex(7个)、RealStar(4个)、AltoStar(1个)、Bosphore(3个)、Bosphore-on-InGenius(1个)、Dia.Pro(2个)、Nuclear-Laser-Medicine(1个)以及3种内部检测方法。样本板A和B分别包含8个世界卫生组织/HDV标准品的系列稀释液(范围:0.5 - 5.0 log10 IU/ml)和20个临床样本(范围:0.5 - 6.0 log10 IU/ml)。测定了以下参数:通过95%检测限(LOD)确定灵敏度,通过批内和批间变异系数(CV)确定精密度,通过预期与观察到的HDV-RNA之间的差异确定准确度,通过线性回归分析确定线性度。

结果

不同检测方法和中心的95% LOD各不相同,表明灵敏度存在异质性:AltoStar的95% LOD最低(3 IU/ml),其次是RealStar(10 [最小值 - 最大值:3 - 316] IU/ml)、Bosphore-on-InGenius(10 IU/ml)、RoboGene(31 [3 - 316] IU/ml)、Nuclear-Laser-Medicine(31 IU/ml)和EuroBioplex(100 [100 - 316] IU/ml)。此外,6种检测方法(RoboGene、EurobioPlex、RealStar、AltoStar、Nuclear-Laser-Medicine和内部检测方法)在所有稀释度下预期与观察到的HDV-RNA之间的差异均<0.5 log10 IU/ml,而其他检测方法存在>1 log10 IU/ml的低估情况。RealStar、Bosphore-on-InGenius和EurobioPlex的精密度最高(平均批内CV < 20%)。所有检测方法的批间CV更高,RealStar、AltoStar、Nuclear-Laser-Medicine和EurobioPlex的CV < 25%。7种检测方法(RoboGene/AltoStar/RealStar/EurobioPlex/Nuclear-Laser-Medicine/内部检测方法)显示出良好的线性度(R > 0.90),但对于HDV-RNA < 1000 IU/ml,只有Bosphore-on-InGenius、AltoStar、RealStar和Robogene的R > 0.85。

结论

本研究强调了灵敏度的异质性(检测方法间和检测方法内),这可能会妨碍HDV-RNA的准确量化,尤其是在低病毒载量时。这就需要提高大多数检测方法的诊断性能,以便正确识别对抗HDV药物的病毒学反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验