• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用常规血液生物标志物和衍生指标预测易损颈动脉斑块的机器学习模型的开发与验证:对性别相关风险模式的见解

Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting vulnerable carotid plaques using routine blood biomarkers and derived indicators: insights into sex-related risk patterns.

作者信息

E Yimin, Yao Zhichao, Ge Maolin, Huo Guijun, Huang Jian, Tang Yao, Liu Zhanao, Tan Ziyi, Zeng Yuqi, Cao Junjie, Zhou Dayong

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, No. 26 Daoqian Street, Jiangsu, Suzhou, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing Luhe People's Hospital, Yangzhou University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Aug 10;24(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02867-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12933-025-02867-6
PMID:40784899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12337436/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of vulnerable carotid plaques is critical for stroke prevention. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model based on routine blood tests and derived indices to predict plaque vulnerability and assess sex-specific risk patterns across biomarker value ranges.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 1701 hospitalized patients from Suzhou Municipal Hospital (2019-2020), selected from an initial cohort of 10,028 individuals. All patients underwent carotid ultrasound, with vulnerable plaques identified using predefined imaging criteria. A total of 30 laboratory variables-including blood count, coagulation, and biochemistry-were extracted, alongside derived indices such as triglyceride-glucose index (TyG), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and others. Features were standardized and selected based on statistical and clinical relevance. Five machine learning models were trained using a 7:3 train-test split and evaluated by cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The best model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. Sex differences were explored using Mann-Whitney U tests and restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling across value intervals.

RESULTS

The Random Forest model showed the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.847; 95% CI 0.791-0.895; specificity = 89.4%; sensitivity = 64.2%). SHAP analysis identified gender, age, fibrinogen, NLR, creatinine, fasting blood glucose, uric acid to high-density lipoprotein ratio (UHR), TyG, systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and lymphocyte count as top predictors. Significant sex-specific differences in SHAP values were observed for key biomarkers, including age, UHR, TyG, SIRI, and others. RCS modeling further revealed distinct sex-related patterns in plaque vulnerability across biomarker value ranges.

CONCLUSION

A Random Forest model integrating routine blood markers and derived indices accurately predicted vulnerable carotid plaques. The results underscore the importance of sex-specific risk assessment, highlighting differential effects of key biomarkers across genders and value intervals.

摘要

背景

早期发现易损性颈动脉斑块对于预防中风至关重要。本研究旨在开发一种基于常规血液检查和衍生指标的机器学习模型,以预测斑块易损性,并评估生物标志物值范围内的性别特异性风险模式。

方法

我们回顾性纳入了苏州市立医院(2019 - 2020年)的1701例住院患者,这些患者选自最初的10028人的队列。所有患者均接受了颈动脉超声检查,使用预定义的影像学标准识别易损斑块。共提取了30项实验室变量,包括血细胞计数、凝血和生化指标,以及衍生指标,如甘油三酯 - 葡萄糖指数(TyG)、血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)等。根据统计和临床相关性对特征进行标准化和选择。使用7:3的训练 - 测试分割训练了五个机器学习模型,并通过交叉验证进行评估。使用AUC、敏感性和特异性评估模型性能。使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析解释最佳模型。使用Mann - Whitney U检验和跨值区间的受限立方样条(RCS)建模探索性别差异。

结果

随机森林模型显示出最高的预测性能(AUC = 0.847;95% CI 0.791 - 0.895;特异性 = 89.4%;敏感性 = 64.2%)。SHAP分析确定性别、年龄、纤维蛋白原、NLR、肌酐、空腹血糖、尿酸与高密度脂蛋白比值(UHR)、TyG、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和淋巴细胞计数为主要预测因素。在关键生物标志物的SHAP值中观察到显著的性别特异性差异,包括年龄、UHR、TyG、SIRI等。RCS建模进一步揭示了生物标志物值范围内斑块易损性的不同性别相关模式。

结论

整合常规血液标志物和衍生指标的随机森林模型准确预测了易损性颈动脉斑块。结果强调了性别特异性风险评估的重要性,突出了关键生物标志物在不同性别和值区间的差异效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/b5e7b5060594/12933_2025_2867_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/3ad970158c85/12933_2025_2867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/23b1dc7b46c7/12933_2025_2867_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/86b869bc3bb6/12933_2025_2867_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/737fc975e86b/12933_2025_2867_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/4975b77fe16b/12933_2025_2867_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/973793192b22/12933_2025_2867_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/3ecd0c5495c3/12933_2025_2867_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/8cb957180248/12933_2025_2867_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/3e7c3a1617f1/12933_2025_2867_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/b5e7b5060594/12933_2025_2867_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/3ad970158c85/12933_2025_2867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/23b1dc7b46c7/12933_2025_2867_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/86b869bc3bb6/12933_2025_2867_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/737fc975e86b/12933_2025_2867_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/4975b77fe16b/12933_2025_2867_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/973793192b22/12933_2025_2867_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/3ecd0c5495c3/12933_2025_2867_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/8cb957180248/12933_2025_2867_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/3e7c3a1617f1/12933_2025_2867_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c2f/12337436/b5e7b5060594/12933_2025_2867_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting vulnerable carotid plaques using routine blood biomarkers and derived indicators: insights into sex-related risk patterns.使用常规血液生物标志物和衍生指标预测易损颈动脉斑块的机器学习模型的开发与验证:对性别相关风险模式的见解
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Aug 10;24(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02867-6.
2
Interpretable machine learning analysis of immunoinflammatory biomarkers for predicting CHD among NAFLD patients.用于预测非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者冠心病的免疫炎症生物标志物的可解释机器学习分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Jul 3;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02818-1.
3
Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.使用LightGBM预测非糖尿病人群的胰岛素抵抗及其临床价值的队列验证:横断面和回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 13;13:e72238. doi: 10.2196/72238.
4
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Development and Validation Using Insights From a Japanese Population-Based Study.预测冠心病风险的机器学习模型:基于日本人群研究的见解进行开发与验证
JMIR Cardio. 2025 May 12;9:e68066. doi: 10.2196/68066.
5
Association between insulin resistance indices and outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者胰岛素抵抗指数与预后的关系
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Jan 22;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02595-x.
6
Associations of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio(NLR), Triglyceride-Glucose Index (TyG), and TyG-derived indices with vitality decline in older adults in China: a study within the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数(TyG)及TyG衍生指数与中国老年人活力下降的相关性:基于老年人综合照护(ICOPE)框架的一项研究
Lipids Health Dis. 2025 Jul 30;24(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12944-025-02671-x.
7
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
8
Advanced Prediction of Heart Failure Risk in Elderly Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients Using Nine Machine Learning Models and Novel Composite Indices: Insights from NHANES 2003-2016.使用九种机器学习模型和新型复合指标对老年糖尿病和高血压患者心力衰竭风险的高级预测:来自2003 - 2016年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的见解
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf081.
9
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between the uric acid-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio (UHR) and the risk of cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia: a population-based study.尿酸与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(UHR)与心血管疾病及血脂异常风险的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2025 Apr 16;24(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12944-025-02551-4.
2
Association between systemic inflammation biomarkers and incident cardiovascular disease in 423,701 individuals: evidence from the UK biobank cohort.423701名个体中全身炎症生物标志物与心血管疾病发病之间的关联:来自英国生物银行队列的证据
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Apr 15;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02721-9.
3
Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals sex differences in the subcellular composition and associated gene-regulatory network activity of human carotid plaques.
单细胞RNA测序揭示了人类颈动脉斑块亚细胞组成及相关基因调控网络活性中的性别差异。
Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2025 Apr;4(4):412-432. doi: 10.1038/s44161-025-00628-y. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
4
Relationship between atherogenic index of plasma and length of stay in critically ill patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a retrospective cohort study and predictive modeling based on machine learning.血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病重症患者住院时间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究及基于机器学习的预测模型
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Feb 28;24(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02654-3.
5
Remnant cholesterol, plasma triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular disease events in young adults: a prospective cohort study.残余胆固醇、血浆甘油三酯与年轻成人心血管疾病事件风险:一项前瞻性队列研究
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf104.
6
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for mortality prediction among patients with infected pancreatic necrosis.用于感染性胰腺坏死患者死亡率预测的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 22;80:103074. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103074. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Preservation of Vascular Endothelial Function in Late-Onset Postmenopausal Women.晚发性绝经后女性血管内皮功能的保留
Circ Res. 2025 Feb 28;136(5):455-469. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.325639. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
8
Utilizing explainable machine learning for progression-free survival prediction in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: insights from a prospective cohort study.利用可解释机器学习预测高级别浆液性卵巢癌的无进展生存期:一项前瞻性队列研究的见解
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3224-3234. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002288.
9
Effects of Age and Sex on Systemic Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Function in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.年龄和性别对2型糖尿病患者全身炎症和心脏代谢功能的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):e037863. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037863. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
10
Prediction of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy efficacy for cancer using routine blood tests and clinical data.利用常规血液检测和临床数据预测癌症患者的检查点抑制剂免疫治疗疗效
Nat Med. 2025 Mar;31(3):869-880. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03398-5. Epub 2025 Jan 6.