Leong Ellie, Geddes Christina E, Weeks Fiona, Kavanaugh Megan L
Senior Research Associate, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA. Correspondence:
Senior Research Assistant, formerly of Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2544432. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2544432. Epub 2025 Sep 12.
Access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care is key for people to realise their reproductive goals, but sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients may experience different barriers or facilitators to access than their non-SGM counterparts. We analysed a panel dataset of 900 patients using publicly funded SRH services in Wisconsin in 2020-2023 and constructed conditional logistic regression models to explore barriers to contraceptive services and subsequent patient-centred contraceptive method use, stratified by SGM status. Experience of barriers to wanted contraception was strongly related to preferred contraceptive use (aOR = 0.36, CI: 0.20-0.64, = 0.002) and method satisfaction (aOR = 0.39, CI: 0.20-0.77, = 0.010). Barriers were also linked to lower use of LARC methods by patients preferring LARC methods, including affordability barriers (aOR = 0.09, CI: 0.01-0.85, = 0.037). SGM patients were less likely to report preferred method use (aOR = 0.18, CI: 0.08-0.42, = 0.001) and method satisfaction (aOR = 0.30, CI: 0.11-0.81, = 0.022) after experiencing barriers. Those who experienced affordability barriers were also less likely to report preferred method use (aOR = 0.18, CI: 0.05-0.68, = 0.015). For non-SGM patients, only experiencing a missed healthcare visit was related to lower method satisfaction (aOR = 0.48, CI: 0.25-0.92, = 0.029). Our study highlights that barriers to contraceptive care can hamper people's ability to realise their contraceptive preferences. Furthermore, our differential findings by SGM status point to potential gaps in healthcare systems that are not adequately set up to serve all patients.
获得性与生殖健康(SRH)护理对于人们实现生育目标至关重要,但性与性别少数群体(SGM)患者在获得护理方面可能会遇到与非SGM患者不同的障碍或促进因素。我们分析了2020年至2023年在威斯康星州使用公共资助的SRH服务的900名患者的面板数据集,并构建了条件逻辑回归模型,以按SGM状态分层,探索避孕服务的障碍以及随后以患者为中心的避孕方法使用情况。期望避孕的障碍经历与首选避孕方法的使用密切相关(调整后比值比[aOR]=0.36,置信区间[CI]:0.20 - 0.64,P=0.002)以及方法满意度(aOR=0.39,CI:0.20 - 0.77,P=0.010)。障碍还与偏好长效可逆避孕方法(LARC)的患者对LARC方法的较低使用率相关,包括可负担性障碍(aOR=0.09,CI:0.01 - 0.85,P=0.037)。SGM患者在经历障碍后,报告首选方法使用(aOR=0.18,CI:0.08 - 0.42,P=0.001)和方法满意度(aOR=0.30,CI:0.11 - 0.81,P=0.022)的可能性较低。经历可负担性障碍的患者报告首选方法使用的可能性也较低(aOR=0.18,CI:0.05 - 0.68,P=0.015)。对于非SGM患者,仅经历错过医疗就诊与较低的方法满意度相关(aOR=0.48,CI:0.25 - 0.92,P=0.029)。我们的研究强调,避孕护理障碍可能会妨碍人们实现其避孕偏好的能力。此外,我们按SGM状态得出的不同结果指出了医疗系统中可能存在的差距,这些系统在为所有患者提供充分服务方面设置不当。