Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Qualitatitive Statistical Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):473-480. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7146.
Sexual orientation and gender identity data are not collected by most hospitals or cancer registries; thus, little is known about the quality of breast cancer treatment for patients from sex and gender minority (SGM) groups.
To evaluate the quality of breast cancer treatment and recurrence outcomes for patients from SGM groups compared with cisgender heterosexual patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Exposure-matched retrospective case-control study of 92 patients from SGM groups treated at an academic medical center from January 1, 2008, to January 1, 2022, matched to cisgender heterosexual patients with breast cancer by year of diagnosis, age, tumor stage, estrogen receptor status, and ERBB2 (HER2) status.
Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as treatment quality, as measured by missed guideline-based breast cancer screening, appropriate referral for genetic counseling and testing, mastectomy vs lumpectomy, receipt of chest reconstruction, adjuvant radiation therapy after lumpectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III disease, antiestrogen therapy for at least 5 years for estrogen receptor-positive disease, ERBB2-directed therapy for ERBB2-positive disease, patient refusal of an oncologist-recommended treatment, time from symptom onset to tissue diagnosis, time from diagnosis to first treatment, and time from breast cancer diagnosis to first recurrence. Results were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing. Compared with cisgender heterosexual patients, those from SGM groups were hypothesized to have disparities in 1 or more of these quality metrics.
Ninety-two patients from SGM groups were matched to 92 cisgender heterosexual patients (n = 184). The median age at diagnosis for all patients was 49 years (IQR, 43-56 years); 74 were lesbian (80%), 12 were bisexual (13%), and 6 were transgender (6%). Compared with cisgender heterosexual patients, those from SGM groups experienced a delay in time from symptom onset to diagnosis (median time to diagnosis, 34 vs 64 days; multivariable adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.99; P = .04), were more likely to decline an oncologist-recommended treatment modality (35 [38%] vs 18 [20%]; multivariable adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.09-4.74; P = .03), and were more likely to experience a breast cancer recurrence (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.56-6.03; P = .001).
This study found that among patients with breast cancer, those from SGM groups experienced delayed diagnosis, with faster recurrence at a 3-fold higher rate compared with cisgender heterosexual patients. These results suggest disparities in the care of patients from SGM groups and warrant further study to inform interventions.
大多数医院或癌症登记处并不收集性取向和性别认同数据;因此,人们对来自性别少数群体(SGM)的患者的乳腺癌治疗质量知之甚少。
评估 SGM 群体患者的乳腺癌治疗质量和复发结果与顺性别异性恋患者相比。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 1 日期间在学术医疗中心接受治疗的 92 名来自 SGM 群体的患者,这些患者与乳腺癌的顺性别异性恋患者按诊断年份、年龄、肿瘤分期、雌激素受体状态和 ERBB2(HER2)状态相匹配。
患者的人口统计学和临床特征,以及治疗质量,通过错过基于指南的乳腺癌筛查、适当转介进行遗传咨询和检测、乳房切除术与保乳术、接受胸部重建、保乳术后辅助放疗、III 期疾病的新辅助化疗、雌激素受体阳性疾病的至少 5 年抗雌激素治疗、ERBB2 阳性疾病的 ERBB2 靶向治疗、患者拒绝接受肿瘤医生推荐的治疗、从症状出现到组织诊断的时间、从诊断到首次治疗的时间以及从乳腺癌诊断到首次复发的时间来衡量。结果经过了多次假设检验的调整。与顺性别异性恋患者相比,SGM 群体患者在这些质量指标中的 1 项或多项中存在差异。
SGM 组的 92 名患者与 92 名顺性别异性恋患者(n = 184)相匹配。所有患者的中位诊断年龄为 49 岁(IQR,43-56 岁);74 名是女同性恋者(80%),12 名是双性恋者(13%),6 名是跨性别者(6%)。与顺性别异性恋患者相比,SGM 群体患者从症状出现到诊断的时间延迟(中位诊断时间,34 天比 64 天;多变量调整后的危险比,0.65;95%CI,0.42-0.99;P = .04),更有可能拒绝肿瘤医生推荐的治疗方案(35 例[38%]比 18 例[20%];多变量调整后的优势比,2.27;95%CI,1.09-4.74;P = .03),并且更有可能经历乳腺癌复发(多变量调整后的危险比,3.07;95%CI,1.56-6.03;P = .001)。
这项研究发现,在乳腺癌患者中,SGM 群体患者的诊断时间延迟,复发速度更快,复发率是顺性别异性恋患者的 3 倍。这些结果表明,SGM 群体患者的护理存在差异,需要进一步研究以提供干预措施。