文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

新辅助治疗后机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术治疗晚期胰腺导管腺癌患者的可行性及临床结局评估:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究

Evaluation of feasibility and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

作者信息

Kim Ha Eun, Jung Hye-Sol, Han Youngmin, Chae Yoon Soo, Yun Won-Gun, Cho Young Jae, Kwon Wooil, Park Joon Seong, Jang Jin-Young

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Aug;109(2):61-70. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.109.2.61. Epub 2025 Jul 30.


DOI:10.4174/astr.2025.109.2.61
PMID:40785812
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12329137/
Abstract

PURPOSE: With neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) broadening the surgical indication for advanced pancreatic cancer, the growing use of robotic platforms in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) necessitates the evaluation of its feasibility in advanced pancreatic cancer patients who have undergone NAT. METHODS: We compared clinicopathological outcomes of advanced pancreatic cancer patients who received either robot-assisted or open PD after NAT at a tertiary hospital from 2015 to 2023. Propensity score matching was performed based on age, sex, and TNM staging. RESULTS: Among 223 patients who received conversion surgery after NAT, 42 open PD and 14 robot-assisted PD patients were matched in a 3:1 ratio. There was a trend of shorter hospital stays (11.4 days 9.8 days, P = 0.218) and less severe postoperative complications (21.4% 7.1%; P = 0.227) in the robot-assisted PD group. Lymph node (LN) yield, LN metastasis rate, and R0 resection rates were similar between the 2 groups. The overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates between the 2 groups were comparable (5-year OS rate: 55.7% 72.7%, P = 0.264; 5-year DFS rate: 54.4% 58.4%, P = 0.759). CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted PD offers comparable short-term and long-term outcomes to open PD, even in patients undergoing conversion surgery after NAT.

摘要

目的:随着新辅助治疗(NAT)扩大了晚期胰腺癌的手术适应症,机器人平台在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)中的应用日益增多,有必要评估其在接受NAT的晚期胰腺癌患者中的可行性。 方法:我们比较了2015年至2023年在一家三级医院接受NAT后接受机器人辅助或开放PD的晚期胰腺癌患者的临床病理结果。根据年龄、性别和TNM分期进行倾向评分匹配。 结果:在223例接受NAT后进行转换手术的患者中,42例开放PD患者和14例机器人辅助PD患者以3:1的比例匹配。机器人辅助PD组有住院时间较短(11.4天对9.8天,P = 0.218)和术后并发症较轻(21.4%对7.1%;P = 0.227)的趋势。两组之间的淋巴结(LN)收获量、LN转移率和R0切除率相似。两组之间的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)率相当(5年OS率:55.7%对72.7%,P = 0.264;5年DFS率:54.4%对58.4%,P = 0.759)。 结论:即使在接受NAT后进行转换手术的患者中,机器人辅助PD的短期和长期结果与开放PD相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7f/12329137/003a3ebec30f/astr-109-61-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7f/12329137/ffd76845caa8/astr-109-61-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7f/12329137/003a3ebec30f/astr-109-61-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7f/12329137/ffd76845caa8/astr-109-61-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c7f/12329137/003a3ebec30f/astr-109-61-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of feasibility and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025-8

[2]
Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Surg Endosc. 2025-7-9

[3]
Survival Outcomes in Nonmetastatic pT4 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis Comparing Neoadjuvant Therapy and Upfront Surgery with Propensity Score Matching.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025-3-1

[4]
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

Eur Urol. 2015-1-2

[5]
Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted sugery for rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy: a large volume single center experience.

BMC Surg. 2025-3-12

[6]
Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Colorectal Dis. 2023-12

[7]
[Comparison of short-term safety and efficacy among total laparoscopic, laparoscopy-assisted, and open radical total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy: a multicenter retrospective study].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025-7-25

[8]
Comparative Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Mid-to-low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Study on Complications and Permanent Stoma Rates.

In Vivo. 2025

[9]
Open vs robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy, cost-effectiveness and long-term oncologic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2024-11

[10]
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025-6-26

本文引用的文献

[1]
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy After Chemotherapy and the Optimal Interval from Radiotherapy to Surgery for Borderline Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-4

[2]
Re-evaluation of risk and oncological outcomes of resection of veins and arteries in the resection of pancreatic cancer.

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024-9

[3]
Robotic Vascular Resection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.

J Clin Med. 2024-3-29

[4]
Examining neoadjuvant treatment candidates in resectable pancreatic cancer based on tumor-vessel interactions and CA 19-9 levels: a retrospective cohort study.

Int J Surg. 2024-5-1

[5]
International survey on opinions and use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: 5-year follow up.

HPB (Oxford). 2024-1

[6]
The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023-8-15

[7]
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-12-1

[8]
Oncologic Benefits of Neoadjuvant Treatment versus Upfront Surgery in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cancers (Basel). 2022-9-7

[9]
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Dutch Randomized PREOPANC Trial.

J Clin Oncol. 2022-4-10

[10]
Cancer statistics, 2022.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2022-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索