• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可视化屏气训练在肝脏动态对比增强磁共振成像中减少呼吸运动伪影的应用

Visualized breath-hold training for reducing respiratory motion artifacts in liver dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Luo Xin, Chen Gen, Zhang Shufeng, Hu Xuemei, Huang Chao

机构信息

Radiology Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):7090-7100. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2526. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

DOI:10.21037/qims-2024-2526
PMID:40785901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12332653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) plays a critical role in detecting hepatic lesions but is highly susceptible to respiratory motion artifacts. Although advancements in rapid magnetic resonance (MR) acquisition techniques have been made, breath-hold acquisitions are predominantly used for abdominal DCE-MRI due to their superior image quality. Therefore, prescan breath-hold training is essential to improving patients' compliance and minimizing respiratory artifacts. Traditional oral training methods, which rely on operators monitoring chest/abdominal movement, are subjective and often insufficient for DCE-MRI requirements, leading to suboptimal image quality and potential risks from repeated contrast administration. To address these limitations, we developed a novel visual breath-hold training instrument and evaluated its efficacy in reducing respiratory artifacts.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 174 patients undergoing liver DCE-MRI (pre-contrast, early arterial, late arterial, portal, and parenchymal phases). Patients were divided into two groups: the visualized breath-hold training (VBT) group (n=87) and the oral breath-hold training (OBT) group (n=87). In the VBT group, breath-hold training was performed with a self-designed visualized respiration training device. Operators objectively assessed training performance and provided individual guidance. In the OBT group, conventional training, with standard verbal instructions and tactile examination of the patients' chest and abdomen, was applied. For analyzing image quality, quantitative metrics [signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] and qualitative respiratory artifact scores were compared between groups with the Mann-Whitney test. For the comparison of diaphragmatic stability across sequential breath-holds, slice pages of the top or bottom of liver were recorded and analyzed via the Mann-Whitney test. A subgroup analysis was performed on non-contrast images from 18 patients, with respiratory artifacts being scored for paired intra-individual comparisons.

RESULTS

The VBT group had a significantly higher SNR and CNR than did the OBT group in the pre-contrast (SNR: P=0.018; CNR: P=0.006), late arterial (SNR: P=0.016; CNR: P=0.029), portal (SNR: P=0.003; CNR: P=0.002), and parenchymal phases (SNR: P=0.044; CNR: P=0.010). Respiratory artifact scores were lower in the VBT group across all phases (pre-contrast: P=0.021; early arterial: P=0.002; late arterial: P=0.001; portal: P<0.001; parenchymal: P<0.001). Diaphragmatic consistency during sequential breath-holds was significantly higher in the VBT group between the early arterial and portal phases (P=0.046) and the late arterial and portal phases (P=0.011) as compared to the OBT group. Intra-individual subgroup analysis further confirmed the reduction of artifacts in the pre-contrast phase scans (P=0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

VBT effectively reduces respiratory motion artifacts and enhances image quality in liver DCE-MRI by improving patient compliance. This approach holds promise for optimizing clinical workflows and diagnostic accuracy, especially in populations with limited breath-hold capacity.

摘要

背景

肝脏动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)在检测肝脏病变中起着关键作用,但极易受到呼吸运动伪影的影响。尽管快速磁共振(MR)采集技术取得了进展,但由于其卓越的图像质量,屏气采集在腹部DCE-MRI中仍占主导地位。因此,预扫描屏气训练对于提高患者的依从性和减少呼吸伪影至关重要。传统的口头训练方法依赖于操作人员监测胸部/腹部运动,具有主观性,往往无法满足DCE-MRI的要求,导致图像质量欠佳以及重复注射造影剂带来的潜在风险。为解决这些局限性,我们开发了一种新型视觉屏气训练仪器,并评估了其在减少呼吸伪影方面的效果。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了174例接受肝脏DCE-MRI检查(包括造影前、动脉早期、动脉晚期、门静脉期和实质期)的患者。患者被分为两组:视觉屏气训练(VBT)组(n = 87)和口头屏气训练(OBT)组(n = 87)。在VBT组中,使用自行设计的视觉呼吸训练设备进行屏气训练。操作人员客观评估训练表现并提供个性化指导。在OBT组中,采用常规训练,即标准的口头指令以及对患者胸部和腹部进行触觉检查。为分析图像质量,使用曼-惠特尼检验比较两组之间的定量指标[信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)]以及定性呼吸伪影评分。为比较连续屏气过程中膈肌的稳定性,记录肝脏顶部或底部的层面图像,并通过曼-惠特尼检验进行分析。对18例患者的非造影图像进行亚组分析,对呼吸伪影进行配对个体内比较评分。

结果

在造影前(SNR:P = 0.018;CNR:P = 0.006)、动脉晚期(SNR:P = 0.016;CNR:P = 0.029)、门静脉期(SNR:P = 0.003;CNR:P = 0.002)和实质期(SNR:P = 0.044;CNR:P = 0.010),VBT组的SNR和CNR均显著高于OBT组。在所有阶段,VBT组的呼吸伪影评分均较低(造影前:P = 0.021;动脉早期:P = 0.002;动脉晚期:P = 0.001;门静脉期:P < 0.001;实质期:P < 0.001)。与OBT组相比,VBT组在动脉早期和门静脉期(P = 0.046)以及动脉晚期和门静脉期(P = 0.011)连续屏气过程中的膈肌一致性显著更高。个体内亚组分析进一步证实了造影前阶段扫描中伪影的减少(P = 0.010)。

结论

VBT通过提高患者依从性,有效减少了肝脏DCE-MRI中的呼吸运动伪影并提高了图像质量。这种方法有望优化临床工作流程和诊断准确性,特别是在屏气能力有限的人群中。

相似文献

1
Visualized breath-hold training for reducing respiratory motion artifacts in liver dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.可视化屏气训练在肝脏动态对比增强磁共振成像中减少呼吸运动伪影的应用
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):7090-7100. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2526. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Deep-learning reconstruction for noise reduction in respiratory-triggered single-shot phase sensitive inversion recovery myocardial delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance.深度学习重建用于呼吸触发单次激发相位敏感反转恢复心肌延迟强化心脏磁共振成像的降噪
Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Oct;122:110460. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2025.110460. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
3
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
4
Ultra-low-dose hepatic computed tomography with a novel real-time deep learning-based noise reduction algorithm: a prospective cross-sectional analysis of image quality and lesion detection.采用新型基于深度学习的实时降噪算法的超低剂量肝脏计算机断层扫描:图像质量和病变检测的前瞻性横断面分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):7006-7018. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-365. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
5
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.超声造影使用声诺维®(六氟化硫微泡)与对比增强计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振成像在局灶性肝脏病变的特征描述和肝转移检测中的比较:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160.
6
Free-Breathing High-Resolution, Swap-Free, and Motion-Corrected Water/Fat Separation in Pediatric Abdominal MRI.自由呼吸高分辨率、无需交换、运动校正的小儿腹部 MRI 水/脂分离。
Invest Radiol. 2024 Dec 1;59(12):805-812. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001092. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Influence of early through late fusion on pancreas segmentation from imperfectly registered multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.早期至晚期融合对来自配准不完善的多模态磁共振成像的胰腺分割的影响。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Mar;12(2):024008. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.2.024008. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
9
Automated devices for identifying peripheral arterial disease in people with leg ulceration: an evidence synthesis and cost-effectiveness analysis.用于识别下肢溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的自动化设备:证据综合和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(37):1-158. doi: 10.3310/TWCG3912.
10
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs.计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像与骨闪烁显像在X线平片阴性的临床疑似舟骨骨折患者中的应用比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 5;2015(6):CD010023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010023.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Transient severe motion artifacts on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: risk factor analysis in 2230 patients.钆塞酸增强 MRI 上短暂的严重运动伪影:2230 例患者的风险因素分析。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Dec;32(12):8629-8638. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08885-2. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Feasibility of Subtraction Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Influencing Factor Analysis: a Retrospective Study.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影减影的可行性及影响因素分析:一项回顾性研究。
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Aug;41(4):821-826. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2413-3. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Gradient and Spin-Echo in Breath-Hold 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.
屏气三维磁共振胰胆管造影中压缩感知与梯度及自旋回波的比较:定性与定量分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;11(4):634. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040634.
4
Transient respiratory motion artifacts in multiple arterial phases on abdominal dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol.腹部动态磁共振成像中多期动脉相的短暂呼吸运动伪影:钆塞酸二钠与钆布醇的对比。
Jpn J Radiol. 2021 Feb;39(2):178-185. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01042-z. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging.定量肝脏磁共振成像主题
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Nov;9(11):1840-1890. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.09.18.
6
Rate of gadoxetate disodium (Eovist®) induced transient respiratory motion in children and young adults.钆塞酸二钠(Eovist®)诱导儿童和青年患者短暂呼吸运动的速率。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Jan;45(1):101-106. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02296-6.
7
Respiratory motion in children and young adults undergoing liver magnetic resonance imaging with intravenous gadoxetate disodium contrast material.儿童和年轻成人在行静脉注射钆塞酸二钠对比磁共振成像时的呼吸运动。
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Aug;49(9):1171-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04437-x. Epub 2019 Jun 16.
8
Comparison of End-Expiration Versus End-Inspiration Breath-Holds With Respect to Respiratory Motion Artifacts on T1-Weighted Abdominal MRI.在T1加权腹部磁共振成像中,呼气末屏气与吸气末屏气对呼吸运动伪影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 May;212(5):1024-1029. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20239. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.欧洲肝脏研究学会临床实践指南:肝细胞癌的管理
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
Diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): current guidelines.肝细胞癌(HCC)的诊断和分期:现行指南。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Jan 31.