Saito Satoshi, Taniguchi Go, Kato Hideo, Nakata Chihiro, Kuramochi Izumi
Department of Epileptology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Ogawahigashi-Cho, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2025 Jul 24;31:100810. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100810. eCollection 2025 Sep.
The Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) is commonly used to screen for major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with epilepsy, yet little is known about longitudinal changes in NDDI-E scores in relation to seizure control and psychiatric care. This study evaluated temporal changes in NDDI-E total and Item 4 scores (ΔNDDI-E, ΔItem 4) over ≥6 months in 34 adults (≥18 years) with baseline NDDI-E scores >13. Patients were seen in a specialized outpatient psychiatry clinic within an epilepsy center. Data included Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings by psychiatrists specialized in epilepsy care, seizure frequency, DSM-5-based psychiatric diagnoses, and treatment interventions (e.g., medication adjustments, psychotherapy, and psychosocial support). Patients also completed a self-report questionnaire. No significant difference in MDD diagnoses was found between those with baseline NDDI-E scores of 14-16 and ≥17 (6.7 % vs. 21.1 %, p = 0.36). Comorbidities included autism spectrum disorder, dissociative disorder, and other mental health conditions. Changes in seizure frequency did not correlate with ΔNDDI-E or CGI-I scores, while ΔNDDI-E and ΔItem 4 showed moderate correlations with CGI-I ( = 0.51 and 0.56). All patients with improved Item 4 scores had better CGI-I ratings (p < 0.001). Qualitative analysis indicated that emotional fluctuations and psychosocial stressors influenced NDDI-E scores. These results suggest that longitudinal improvement in NDDI-E Item 4 may serve as a marker for psychiatric benefit. Effective use of the NDDI-E requires considering the psychiatric and psychosocial dimensions beyond seizure control. To validate these findings, studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are necessary.
癫痫神经障碍抑郁量表(NDDI-E)常用于筛查癫痫患者的重度抑郁症(MDD),但关于NDDI-E评分与癫痫控制及精神科护理相关的纵向变化却知之甚少。本研究评估了34名基线NDDI-E评分>13的成年人(≥18岁)在≥6个月内NDDI-E总分及项目4评分(ΔNDDI-E、Δ项目4)的时间变化。患者在癫痫中心的专门门诊精神科就诊。数据包括癫痫护理专科精神科医生的临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)评分、癫痫发作频率、基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的精神科诊断以及治疗干预措施(如药物调整、心理治疗和社会心理支持)。患者还完成了一份自我报告问卷。基线NDDI-E评分为14 - 16分和≥17分的患者在MDD诊断方面未发现显著差异(6.7%对21.1%,p = 0.36)。合并症包括自闭症谱系障碍、解离性障碍和其他心理健康状况。癫痫发作频率的变化与ΔNDDI-E或CGI-I评分无关,而ΔNDDI-E和Δ项目4与CGI-I显示出中等程度的相关性(分别为0.51和0.56)。所有项目4评分改善的患者CGI-I评分更好(p < 0.001)。定性分析表明,情绪波动和社会心理压力源会影响NDDI-E评分。这些结果表明,NDDI-E项目4的纵向改善可能作为精神科获益的一个指标。有效使用NDDI-E需要考虑癫痫控制之外的精神科和社会心理维度。为验证这些发现,有必要进行更大样本量和更长随访时间的研究。