Hammen C, Marks T, deMayo R, Mayol A
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Nov;49(5):1147-59. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.49.5.1147.
The role of depressive self-schemas in vulnerability to depression was explored in a longitudinal design. Five groups of subjects hypothesized to be at differential risk for depression according to a schema model were identified: depressed schematic, depressed nonschematic, nondepressed schematic, nondepressed nonschematic, and a psychopathology control. They were followed regularly for 4 months with self-report and clinical interview measures of depression. There was no evidence of risk for depression associated with schema status apart from initial mood and no interaction of life stress events and schemas. In a second experiment with the same subjects, it was shown that depressive self-schemas do not exert an ongoing, active influence on everyday information processing; instead current mood affected information processing. Remitted depressed persons resembled nondepressed rather than depressed ones. The results support Kuiper and colleagues' distinction between concomitant and vulnerability schemas, and help to clarify differences between cognitions that are symptoms or correlates of depression and those that may play a causal role under certain conditions.
在一项纵向研究设计中,探讨了抑郁自我图式在易患抑郁症方面的作用。根据图式模型,确定了五组被认为患抑郁症风险不同的受试者:抑郁图式组、非抑郁图式组、非抑郁图式组、非抑郁非图式组和精神病理学对照组。通过自我报告和抑郁症临床访谈测量,对他们进行了为期4个月的定期跟踪。除了初始情绪外,没有证据表明图式状态与抑郁症风险相关,也没有发现生活应激事件与图式之间的相互作用。在对同一受试者进行的第二项实验中,结果表明抑郁自我图式不会对日常信息处理产生持续、积极的影响;相反,当前情绪会影响信息处理。缓解期的抑郁症患者与非抑郁症患者相似,而非与抑郁症患者相似。这些结果支持了 Kuiper 及其同事对伴随图式和易患图式的区分,并有助于阐明作为抑郁症症状或相关因素的认知与在某些条件下可能起因果作用的认知之间的差异。