Jaworska Natalia, Hezam Areej, Poulin Thérèse, Kromm Julie A, Burry Lisa D, Niven Daniel J, Fiest Kirsten M
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Aug 11;7(8):e1297. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001297. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if objective sedation monitoring practices reduce duration of mechanical ventilation and other clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes in critically ill adult patients.
Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PROSPERO, and the grey literature.
Observational or interventional original research studies, conducted in adult critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, evaluating any objective sedation monitoring practice (e.g., electroencephalography [EEG]), and reporting on duration of mechanical ventilation or other secondary outcomes (e.g., length of stay) were included.
Meta-analysis was performed for pooled estimates of the primary outcome and each individual secondary outcome using random-effects modeling.
Twenty studies (3410 patients) were included with 15 studies evaluating processed EEG monitoring, 2 evaluating EEG monitoring, and 3 evaluating processed facial electromyography (EMG). Processed EEG was not associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.33; 95% CI, -0.91 to 0.25; I2 = 84.4%). Secondary outcomes of processed EEG monitoring showed decreased hospital length of stay (days) (SMD -0.89; 95% CI, -1.17 to -0.62; I2 = 13.4%), reduced total sedative dose (reported in propofol equivalents, mg) (SMD -1.29; 95% CI, -2.27 to -0.31; I2 = 96.6%), and reduced total opioid dose (reported in morphine equivalents, mg) (SMD -0.40; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.04; I2 = 77.0%). Processed facial EMG was associated with an increased risk of adverse events (risk ratio 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90; I2 = 0.00%). Risk of bias was serious for 65% (n = 13/20) of included studies.
Processed EEG monitoring is not associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation but may be associated with reduced sedative and opioid exposure and decreased hospital length of stay. Processed facial EMG monitoring may be associated with increased adverse events.
进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定客观镇静监测措施是否能缩短重症成年患者的机械通气时间以及改善其他临床和医疗资源利用结局。
Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和PROSPERO,以及灰色文献。
纳入在接受有创机械通气的成年重症患者中进行的观察性或干预性原始研究,这些研究评估了任何客观镇静监测措施(如脑电图[EEG]),并报告了机械通气时间或其他次要结局(如住院时间)。
使用随机效应模型对主要结局和每个单独的次要结局的合并估计值进行荟萃分析。
纳入了20项研究(3410例患者),其中15项研究评估了处理后的脑电图监测,2项评估了脑电图监测,3项评估了处理后的面部肌电图(EMG)。处理后的脑电图与缩短机械通气时间无关(标准化均数差[SMD] -0.33;95%可信区间,-0.91至0.25;I² = 84.4%)。处理后的脑电图监测的次要结局显示住院时间(天)缩短(SMD -0.89;95%可信区间,-1.17至-0.62;I² = 13.4%),镇静总剂量减少(以丙泊酚等效剂量报告,mg)(SMD -1.29;95%可信区间,-2.27至-0.31;I² = 96.6%),阿片类药物总剂量减少(以吗啡等效剂量报告,mg)(SMD -0.40;95%可信区间,-0.76至-0.04;I² = 77.0%)。处理后的面部肌电图与不良事件风险增加相关(风险比1.40;95%可信区间,1.03 - 1.90;I² = 0.00%)。纳入研究的65%(n = 13/20)存在严重偏倚风险。
处理后的脑电图监测与缩短机械通气时间无关,但可能与减少镇静剂和阿片类药物暴露以及缩短住院时间有关。处理后的面部肌电图监测可能与不良事件增加有关。