Leal Thagid Yasmin, Garib Daniela, Eto Henrique, Rosa Raquel, Miranda Felicia, Soares Asenate, Fukushiro Ana Paula, Berretin-Felix Giédre
Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Speech-language Pathology Department, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Aug 12;29(9):407. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06483-2.
To compare changes in tongue pressure during anterior open bite (AOB) treatment using a fixed palatal crib (PC) alone versus PC combined with brief orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT), and to determine whether these changes predict overbite correction.
Thirty-two patients were divided into two groups: the PC group received a fixed palatal crib alone, while the PC-OMT group received PC plus weekly OMT sessions for the first two months. Lateral cephalometric radiographs and tongue pressure measurements using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) were collected at baseline (T1) and after open bite correction or 12 months later when the appliance was removed (T2). Primary outcomes included changes in tongue pressure and overbite. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlled for initial open bite severity (p < 0.05). Linear regression analyzed the relationship between tongue pressure changes and overbite correction.
Each group included 16 patients (PC: 3 males, 13 females; mean age 8.65± 0.93 years; PC-OMT: 9 males, 7 females; mean age 7.97 ± 1.00 years). Both groups showed similar overbite improvements. Tongue pressure increased in all variables across groups; however, swallowing pressure increased significantly less in the PC-OMT group. Changes in tongue pressure were not associated with overbite correction.
Treatment with PC alone or combined with brief OMT yielded comparable overbite corrections. The addition of OMT moderated tongue pressure increases during swallowing. Changes in tongue pressure did not predict open bite correction in mixed dentition.
Brief OMT combined with PC may reduce atypical swallowing post-crib removal, supporting long-term treatment stability.
比较单独使用固定腭托矫治器(PC)与PC联合短期口面部肌功能治疗(OMT)在前牙开(牙合)(AOB)治疗期间舌压力的变化,并确定这些变化是否能预测覆(牙合)的矫正情况。
32例患者分为两组:PC组仅接受固定腭托矫治器治疗,而PC-OMT组在最初两个月接受PC联合每周一次的OMT治疗。在基线期(T1)以及开(牙合)矫正后或矫治器拆除12个月后(T2),收集头颅侧位X线片以及使用爱荷华口腔功能仪(IOPI)测量舌压力。主要观察指标包括舌压力和覆(牙合)的变化。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)控制初始开(牙合)严重程度(p < 0.05)。线性回归分析舌压力变化与覆(牙合)矫正之间的关系。
每组各有16例患者(PC组:3例男性,13例女性;平均年龄8.65±0.93岁;PC-OMT组:9例男性,7例女性;平均年龄7.97±1.00岁)。两组覆(牙合)改善情况相似。所有变量的舌压力在两组中均增加;然而,PC-OMT组吞咽压力增加明显较少。舌压力变化与覆(牙合)矫正无关。
单独使用PC或联合短期OMT治疗产生了相当的覆(牙合)矫正效果。添加OMT可减轻吞咽时舌压力的增加。在混合牙列中,舌压力变化不能预测开(牙合)矫正情况。
短期OMT联合PC可能减少矫治器拆除后异常吞咽,支持长期治疗稳定性。