Suppr超能文献

快速上颌扩弓对前牙开(牙合)治疗稳定性的影响

Influence of rapid maxillary expansion in the stability of anterior open bite treatment.

作者信息

Teixeira Rodrigo Almeida Nunes, Ferrari Junior Flávio Mauro, Garib Daniela

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, Bauru, São Paulo, 17012-901, Brazil.

Interceptive Orthodontics Post-Graduate Program, Profis and Private Practice, R. Silvio Marchione, 3-55, Bauru, São Paulo, 17012-230, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Oct;26(10):6371-6378. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04592-w. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the stability of anterior open bite (AOB) in patients treated with and without rapid maxillary expansion (RME) before fixed palatal crib (PC) therapy in the mixed dentition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Expansion/palatal crib group (EPC) was comprised of 25 patients (10 male, 15 female, mean initial age of 7.8 years) with AOB treated with RME before PC therapy. Palatal crib group (PC) included 25 patients with AOB (10 male, 15 female, mean initial age of 8.0 years) treated only with PC therapy. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at pre-treatment (T0), after PC therapy (T1), and 3 years after PC removal (T2) in both groups. AOB relapse was considered when a negative overbite was observed at T2. Intergroup comparisons of interphase changes were performed using t and Mann-Whitney tests (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Treatment and post-treatment alterations showed similar changes in both groups for all cephalometric variables. Overall changes from T0 to T2 were similar between the groups except for the maxillary incisors that tipped lingually in PC group (1.PP =  - 3.37°) and labially in EPC group (1.PP = 1.76°). The frequency of AOB relapse was 8% and 4% in the EPC and PC groups, respectively. Treatment time in the EPC group (9.7 months) was shorter (p = 0.024) when compared to the PC group (11.0 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In the mixed dentition, stability of AOB treated with RME before fixed PC therapy was similar to PC therapy alone. However, treatment time with fixed PC was slightly shorter in the group treated with RME.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study aims to understand if RME performed previously to fixed palatal crib contributes to the index of stability of AOB treatment in the mixed dentition.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在混合牙列期接受或未接受快速上颌扩弓(RME)治疗的患者在固定腭托(PC)治疗前的前牙开颌(AOB)稳定性。

材料与方法

扩弓/腭托组(EPC)由25例AOB患者组成(男10例,女15例,平均初始年龄7.8岁),在PC治疗前接受RME治疗。腭托组(PC)包括25例仅接受PC治疗的AOB患者(男10例,女15例,平均初始年龄8.0岁)。两组均在治疗前(T0)、PC治疗后(T1)以及去除PC后3年(T2)进行头颅侧位片分析。当在T2观察到覆合为负时,认为存在AOB复发。使用t检验和曼-惠特尼检验进行组间相间变化的比较(p < 0.05)。

结果

对于所有头影测量变量,两组在治疗和治疗后的改变相似。除上颌切牙在PC组舌倾(1.PP = -3.37°)而在EPC组唇倾(1.PP = 1.76°)外,两组从T0到T2的总体变化相似。EPC组和PC组AOB复发的频率分别为8%和4%。与PC组(11.0个月)相比,EPC组的治疗时间(9.7个月)更短(p = 0.024)。

结论

在混合牙列期,固定PC治疗前接受RME治疗的AOB稳定性与单纯PC治疗相似。然而,RME治疗组使用固定PC的治疗时间略短。

临床意义

本研究旨在了解在固定腭托之前进行的RME是否有助于混合牙列期AOB治疗的稳定性指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验