• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主管自我评估与员工对领导力认知之间的差异:一项医疗保健领域的横断面研究

Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare.

作者信息

Long Nguyen Hoang, Sochalski Julie

机构信息

College of Health Sciences, VinUniversity, Ha Noi, Gia Lam District, Vietnam.

Asian Wisdom Care Research Unit, Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 11;24(1):1049. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03665-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03665-x
PMID:40790478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12337420/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Employees' perceptions of their supervisors' leadership influence their conduct and daily performance. These perceptions often conflict with leaders' self-assessments. Understanding this incongruency can help leaders improve their leadership skills. This study aimed to assess the congruency between frontline healthcare staff's and supervisors' perceptions of leadership styles.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 574 professional and technical staff (nurses, midwives, and technicians) and 93 direct supervisors recruited from all seven hospitals of the Vinmec Healthcare System, which is the largest private healthcare system in Vietnam. Leadership style was assessed using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5X).

RESULTS

Study findings revealed similarities and differences in perceptions of leadership between staff and supervisors. Both groups agreed that transactional contingent reward behaviors were most frequently used, as indicated by mean scores above 2.5, whereas laissez-faire behaviors were least often utilized, with the lowest overall ratings (supervisors: 0.92 ± 0.67; staff: 1.23 ± 0.78). However, supervisors' scores were significantly higher than those of their staff for almost all leadership components, with large and significant mean differences observed in areas such as individualized consideration (mean difference = 0.63, t = 9.34, p <.001). Notably, staff rated supervisors as using laissez-faire behaviors more frequently than their supervisors assumed they did, with a statistically significant difference (t = - 3.96, p <.001). Regarding leadership outcomes, supervisors believed that their leadership style was more effective than their staff perceived it, as evidenced by higher scores for effectiveness (2.94 vs. 2.72, t = 3.46, p <.001), satisfaction (3.02 vs. 2.73, t = 3.90, p <.001), and extra effort (2.98 vs. 2.57, t = 6.49, p <.001).

CONCLUSION

Supervisors should recognize their leadership styles and how they are perceived by staff, using feedback as a basis for self-improvement and ensuring their intentions are clearly communicated. In nursing, 360-degree feedback and reflective practices may help narrow leadership perception gaps. Future research should examine factors underlying these discrepancies and assess whether improving alignment enhances team performance and care quality.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

员工对其上级领导的看法会影响他们的行为和日常表现。这些看法往往与领导的自我评估相冲突。了解这种不一致有助于领导提高他们的领导技能。本研究旨在评估一线医护人员与上级领导对领导风格看法的一致性。

方法

本横断面研究于2021年1月至2022年6月进行。数据收集自Vinmec医疗系统所有七家医院的574名专业技术人员(护士、助产士和技术人员)和93名直接上级领导的便利样本,Vinmec医疗系统是越南最大的私立医疗系统。使用多因素领导问卷(MLQ 5X)评估领导风格。

结果

研究结果揭示了员工和上级领导在领导看法上的异同。两组都认为交易型权变奖励行为使用最为频繁,平均得分高于2.5,而放任式行为使用最少,总体评分最低(上级领导:0.92±0.67;员工:1.23±0.78)。然而,几乎所有领导维度上,上级领导的得分都显著高于其员工,在个性化关怀等方面观察到较大且显著的平均差异(平均差异=0.63,t=9.34,p<0.001)。值得注意的是,员工对上级领导放任式行为的评分高于上级领导的自我认知,差异具有统计学意义(t=-3.96,p<0.001)。关于领导结果,上级领导认为他们的领导风格比员工感知的更有效,有效性得分更高(2.94对2.72,t=3.46,p<0.001)、满意度得分更高(3.02对2.73,t=3.90,p<0.001)以及额外努力得分更高(2.98对2.57,t=6.49,p<0.001)证明了这一点。

结论

上级领导应认识到他们的领导风格以及员工对其的看法,将反馈作为自我提升的基础,并确保他们的意图得到清晰传达。在护理领域,360°反馈和反思性实践可能有助于缩小领导认知差距。未来的研究应探讨这些差异背后的因素,并评估改善一致性是否能提高团队绩效和护理质量。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea8/12337420/18838db2e1a3/12912_2025_3665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea8/12337420/18838db2e1a3/12912_2025_3665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea8/12337420/18838db2e1a3/12912_2025_3665_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare.主管自我评估与员工对领导力认知之间的差异:一项医疗保健领域的横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 11;24(1):1049. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03665-x.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Leadership style based on the study of multifactor leadership questionnaire in Palu Anutapura hospital.基于多因素领导问卷在帕卢阿努塔拉医院的研究的领导风格。
Gac Sanit. 2021;35 Suppl 2:S432-S434. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.069.
2
Perceived Leadership Styles, Outcomes of Leadership, and Self-Efficacy Among Nurse Leaders:: A Hospital-Based Survey to Inform Leadership Development at a US Regional Medical Center.护士领导者的感知领导风格、领导成果及自我效能:一项基于医院的调查,为美国一家地区医疗中心的领导力发展提供参考
Nurse Lead. 2020 Oct 1. doi: 10.1016/j.mnl.2020.07.010.
3
Self-perception of leadership style of dentists: heads of dental departments in community hospitals, Southern Thailand.
牙医领导风格的自我认知:泰国南部社区医院牙科主任。
Int Dent J. 2020 Jun;70(3):193-200. doi: 10.1111/idj.12544. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
The relationship between nurse managers' leadership style and patients' perception of the quality of the care provided by nurses: Cross sectional survey.护士管理者的领导风格与患者对护士提供的护理质量的感知之间的关系:横断面调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Jan;101:103446. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103446. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Correlation between nursing managers' leadership styles and nurses' job stress and anticipated turnover.护理管理者领导风格与护士工作压力和预期离职的相关性。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Apr;27(3):527-534. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12707. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review.领导力风格和护理劳动力及工作环境的结果模式:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Sep;85:19-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
The influence of staff nurse perception of leadership style on satisfaction with leadership: a cross-sectional survey of pediatric nurses.护士长领导风格感知对领导满意度的影响:儿科护士的横断面调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Sep;49(9):1103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
8
From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes.从理想走向现实:关于内隐领导理论对领导-成员交换关系及员工绩效影响的纵向研究
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jul;90(4):659-76. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659.