• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻不良反应报告趋势:对加拿大非医疗用途大麻合法化和监管以来提交给加拿大警戒计划的自发报告数据的描述性分析。

Trends in cannabis adverse reaction reports: A descriptive analysis of spontaneous reporting data submitted to the Canada Vigilance Program since legalization and regulation of cannabis for non-medical purposes in Canada.

作者信息

Plebon-Huff Sieara, Aziz Nadia, Cavar Marko, Hassan Safia, Aoun Maria, Perwaiz Shahid, Abramovici Hanan

机构信息

Office of Cannabis Science and Surveillance, Strategic Policy Directorate, Controlled Substances and Cannabis Branch, Health Canada, 150 Tunney's Pasture Driveway, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0T6, Canada.

出版信息

J Cannabis Res. 2025 Aug 12;7(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00310-x.

DOI:10.1186/s42238-025-00310-x
PMID:40790541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12341263/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cannabis control framework implemented by Canada in October 2018 established a robust post-market surveillance system for cannabis products, adopting tools and practices from the existing pharmacovigilance system for pharmaceuticals and health products. The cannabis vigilance system relies on spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions, allowing Health Canada to collect, monitor and assess health effects involving cannabis. In this study, we examine trends in adverse reaction reports involving legal cannabis products since legalization and regulation in Canada.

METHODS

Unique case reports of adverse reactions involving cannabis were collected through the Canada Vigilance Program. Case details were extracted from each report involving legal cannabis as a suspected product. Each case was also assessed for causality to determine the likelihood of association between the cannabis product(s) and the reported event(s). The case data was then aggregated and descriptively analyzed to identify adverse reaction case patterns, including the demographic profiles and use patterns of individuals reporting adverse reactions to cannabis.

RESULTS

Overall, individuals reporting an adverse reaction to a cannabis product (n = 698) were 56.0 ± 20.0 years of age. 45.4% of reporting individuals were female, and 67.5% of individuals self-reported using cannabis for medical purposes, with pain management as the most cited reason for medical use. Most cases were reported as serious (62.3%), citing "other medically important condition" as the primary reason for seriousness (58.6%), and 68.8% of all cases involved cannabis extracts. Frequently reported events included hallucination, headache, nausea, dizziness and dyspnea. Some events were more frequently reported with products containing a greater concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol to cannabidiol, whereas others were more frequently reported with products containing a greater concentration of cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol. Causality was assessed for 668 events; most were assessed as being "possibly" associated with the reported cannabis product.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-market adverse reaction reporting system for cannabis products has provided valuable safety information about cannabis products available for legal retail sale in Canada. The data collected through this framework have helped identify emerging risks associated with legal cannabis products; contributed to international data about cannabis effects and risks; informed the development of communication materials related to new and emerging risks; and provided evidence to inform regulatory decisions.

摘要

背景

加拿大2018年10月实施的大麻管制框架为大麻产品建立了一个强大的上市后监测系统,采用了现有药品和保健品药物警戒系统的工具和做法。大麻警戒系统依赖于不良反应的自发报告,使加拿大卫生部能够收集、监测和评估涉及大麻的健康影响。在本研究中,我们调查了加拿大将大麻产品合法化并进行监管后,涉及合法大麻产品的不良反应报告趋势。

方法

通过加拿大警戒计划收集涉及大麻的不良反应独特病例报告。病例细节从每份涉及合法大麻作为可疑产品的报告中提取。还对每个病例进行因果关系评估,以确定大麻产品与报告事件之间关联的可能性。然后汇总病例数据并进行描述性分析,以确定不良反应病例模式,包括报告大麻不良反应的个人的人口统计学特征和使用模式。

结果

总体而言,报告大麻产品不良反应的个人(n = 698)年龄为56.0±20.0岁。45.4%的报告个人为女性,67.5%的个人自我报告使用大麻用于医疗目的,疼痛管理是最常被提及的医疗用途原因。大多数病例报告为严重(62.3%),将“其他具有医学重要性的病症”作为严重程度的主要原因(58.6%),所有病例中有68.8%涉及大麻提取物。经常报告的事件包括幻觉、头痛、恶心、头晕和呼吸困难。一些事件在含有更高浓度四氢大麻酚与大麻二酚的产品中报告得更频繁,而其他事件在含有更高浓度大麻二酚与四氢大麻酚的产品中报告得更频繁。对668起事件进行了因果关系评估;大多数被评估为“可能”与报告的大麻产品有关。

结论

大麻产品的上市后不良反应报告系统提供了有关加拿大合法零售的大麻产品的宝贵安全信息。通过该框架收集的数据有助于识别与合法大麻产品相关的新出现风险;为有关大麻影响和风险的国际数据做出了贡献;为与新出现风险相关的宣传材料的制定提供了信息;并为监管决策提供了证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/d2830c68f0f7/42238_2025_310_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/14fc60dc8cd0/42238_2025_310_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/25f44a9de8d4/42238_2025_310_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/0ca4b653f61d/42238_2025_310_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/d2830c68f0f7/42238_2025_310_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/14fc60dc8cd0/42238_2025_310_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/25f44a9de8d4/42238_2025_310_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/0ca4b653f61d/42238_2025_310_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b48/12341263/d2830c68f0f7/42238_2025_310_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in cannabis adverse reaction reports: A descriptive analysis of spontaneous reporting data submitted to the Canada Vigilance Program since legalization and regulation of cannabis for non-medical purposes in Canada.大麻不良反应报告趋势:对加拿大非医疗用途大麻合法化和监管以来提交给加拿大警戒计划的自发报告数据的描述性分析。
J Cannabis Res. 2025 Aug 12;7(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00310-x.
2
Cannabis and schizophrenia.大麻与精神分裂症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 14;2014(10):CD004837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004837.pub3.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
6
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
9
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2020.暴力死亡监测 - 全国暴力死亡报告系统,2020 年,48 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 May 26;72(5):1-38. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7205a1.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacovigilance and spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: Challenges and opportunities.药物警戒与自发药品不良反应报告:挑战与机遇
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):177-179. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_169_22. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Are adverse effects of cannabidiol (CBD) products caused by tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contamination?大麻二酚(CBD)产品的不良反应是由四氢大麻酚(THC)污染引起的吗?
F1000Res. 2019 Aug 8;8:1394. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19931.7. eCollection 2019.
3
Reported adverse drug reactions in women and men: Aggregated evidence from globally collected individual case reports during half a century.
女性和男性中报告的药物不良反应:半个世纪以来全球收集的个体病例报告的汇总证据。
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Oct 25;17:100188. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.10.001. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study.向荷兰国家药物警戒中心报告的药物不良反应中的性别差异:一项探索性观察研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul;85(7):1507-1515. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13923. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
5
Bias in spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in Japan.日本药品不良反应自发报告中的偏差。
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0126413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126413. eCollection 2015.
6
Adverse drug reactions in Germany: direct costs of internal medicine hospitalizations.德国的药物不良反应:内科住院的直接成本。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):626-34. doi: 10.1002/pds.2118. Epub 2011 Mar 8.