Spyrelis Alexandra, Loades Maria E, Roomaney Rizwana
Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Sep;30(3):e70014. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.70014.
This study developed and assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory outcomes of a six-session cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based intervention for endometriosis-related persistent fatigue, called Managing Fatigue in Endometriosis (MEND).
MEND was developed based on CBT for persistent fatigue and a prior qualitative study among fatigued patients with endometriosis in South Africa. After expert review, it was delivered online by trained counsellors to small groups. A single-arm within-subjects study with 21 participants (mean age 33.1, range 23-43 years) reporting moderate to severe fatigue pre-intervention was conducted. Feasibility, acceptability and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed.
A high eligibility rate (n = 43, 83%) and lower enrolment rate (n = 21, 49%) were observed. Session attendance varied (43%-76%), with a 57% (n = 12) completion and 28% (n = 5) drop-out rate, mainly due to countrywide power outages during implementation. Qualitative data indicated that the intervention was acceptable to both participants and interventionists. Although not sufficiently powered to determine effectiveness, the Reliable Change Index indicated a mixed pattern of change-some outcomes showed improvement (18%-55%), while others reflected no change (18%-64%) or deterioration (9%-36%).
MEND was found to be feasible and acceptable, although attrition was high. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to assess treatment efficacy more definitively.
本研究开发并评估了一种基于六节认知行为疗法(CBT)的干预措施,用于治疗与子宫内膜异位症相关的持续性疲劳,称为“子宫内膜异位症疲劳管理”(MEND),并评估了其可行性、可接受性和探索性结果。
MEND是基于针对持续性疲劳的CBT以及南非疲劳子宫内膜异位症患者先前的定性研究开发的。经专家评审后,由经过培训的咨询师以小组形式在线提供该干预措施。对21名参与者(平均年龄33.1岁,范围23 - 43岁)进行了一项单组受试者内研究,这些参与者在干预前报告有中度至重度疲劳。评估了可行性、可接受性和患者报告的结局指标。
观察到高入选率(n = 43,83%)和较低的入组率(n = 21,49%)。课程出勤率各不相同(43% - 76%),完成率为57%(n = 12),辍学率为28%(n = 5),主要原因是实施期间全国范围的停电。定性数据表明,该干预措施对参与者和干预者都可接受。尽管样本量不足以确定有效性,但可靠变化指数显示出变化的混合模式——一些结局有所改善(18% - 55%),而其他结局则未显示变化(18% - 64%)或恶化(9% - 36%)。
尽管损耗率较高,但发现MEND是可行且可接受的。有必要进行一项随机对照试验,以更明确地评估治疗效果。