Asma Khallouli, Yassin Oueslati, Cyrine Lagneb, Racem Choura, Saker Bouchoucha, Afef Maalej
Department of Ophthalmology, Principal Military Hospital of Instruction of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Ibn El Jazzar of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 12:11206721251367571. doi: 10.1177/11206721251367571.
PurposeTo compare and evaluate the diagnostic performance of OCT-angiography (OCT-A) parameters in diabetic retinopathy (DR) detection compared to fluorescein angiography (FA).MethodsThis is a cross-sectional, prospective study including 118 diabetic patients (214 eyes). All patients had a complete clinical examination with FA as well as macular OCT-A imaging (3 × 3 mm, 6 × 6 mm). We compared the detection of fundamental DR lesions using both imaging modalities and assessed the diagnostic value of different OCT-A parameters.ResultsMicroaneurysms were more frequently detected by FA than with OCT-A. Intraretinal microvascular anomalies were equally visualized by OCT-A (0.27 ± 0.777) and FA (0.27 ± 0.71). Average of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) surface was less significant at superficial capillary plexus (SCP) (0.353 ± 0.107 mm²) compared to deep capillary plexus (DCP) (0.537 ± 0,135 mm²), (p < 0.001). FAZ remodeling was observed even in DR free eyes and was better identified in DCP (61.1%) than SCP (47.2%). Loss of FAZ circularity was estimated at 0.792 ± 0.081 and 0.741 ± 0.107 respectively in SCP and DCP, (p < 0.001). Average surface area of capillary non-perfusion zones (CNPZ) was 0.487 ± 0.514 mm² in SCP and 0.145 ± 0.223 mm² in DCP, (p < 0.001). The Most reliable OCT-A quantitative parameters for DR screening were: CNPZ surface in DCP (p = 0.0046), total vascular density (VDt) in the DCP (p = 0.003) and CNPZ surface in the SCP (p = 0.0027).ConclusionOCT-A enables diabetic microvascular abnormalities detection even at a preclinical stage. Certain OCT-A parameters may provide a valuable quantitative approach for diagnosis and grading of DR severity.
比较和评估光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCT-A)参数与荧光素血管造影(FA)相比在糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)检测中的诊断性能。
这是一项横断面、前瞻性研究,纳入了118例糖尿病患者(214只眼)。所有患者均接受了包括FA以及黄斑OCT-A成像(3×3mm,6×6mm)在内的完整临床检查。我们比较了两种成像方式对基本DR病变的检测情况,并评估了不同OCT-A参数的诊断价值。
FA比OCT-A更频繁地检测到微动脉瘤。视网膜内微血管异常在OCT-A(0.27±0.777)和FA(0.27±0.71)中同样可见。与深层毛细血管丛(DCP)(0.537±0.135mm²)相比,浅表毛细血管丛(SCP)的中心凹无血管区(FAZ)平均面积较小(0.353±0.107mm²),(p<0.001)。即使在无DR的眼中也观察到FAZ重塑,并且在DCP中(61.1%)比SCP中(47.2%)能更好地识别。SCP和DCP中FAZ圆形度的损失分别估计为0.792±0.081和0.741±0.107,(p<0.001)。SCP中毛细血管无灌注区(CNPZ)的平均表面积为0.487±0.514mm²,DCP中为0.145±0.223mm²,(p<0.001)。用于DR筛查的最可靠的OCT-A定量参数为:DCP中的CNPZ表面积(p=0.0046)、DCP中的总血管密度(VDt)(p=0.003)和SCP中的CNPZ表面积(p=0.0027)。
OCT-A即使在临床前期也能检测到糖尿病微血管异常。某些OCT-A参数可能为DR严重程度的诊断和分级提供有价值的定量方法。