Suppr超能文献

不同运动类型对血糖控制异常个体血管内皮功能的影响:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析

Effects of different exercise types on vascular endothelial function in individuals with abnormal glycaemic control: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Zongxiang, Luo Shengyao, Bai Xuebing, Huang Lu, Guo Hongyan, Chen Song, Wang Dan

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education and Art, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, China.

Provincial University Key Laboratory of Sport and Health Science, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2025 Aug 8;13:e19839. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19839. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a key marker of endothelial function, often impaired in individuals with abnormal glycemic control. While exercise has been shown to improve brachial artery FMD, the relative efficacy of different exercise modalities remains unclear. This study employed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effects of various types of exercise on FMD.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases identified randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of exercise on brachial artery FMD up to January 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Eligible studies were assessed for bias using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Stata 16.0 was used for the NMA.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies with 797 participants (prediabetes: 76; T2DM: 721) were included. Aerobic interval exercise (AIE) significantly improved FMD (MD = 2.23%, 95% CI [1.0 9%-3.37%],  < 0.05), followed by mind-body exercise (MBE) (MD = 1.97%, 95% CI [0.60%-3.33%],  < 0.05). Combined exercise (CE) (MD = 1.17%, 95% CI [0.13%-2.21%],  < 0.05) and aerobic continuous exercise (ACE) (MD = 1.20%, 95% CI [0.52%-1.87%],  < 0.05) also showed significant improvements. SUCRA values indicated that AIE (89.0) and MBE (80.1) were the most effective in improving FMD, followed by CE (51.0), ACE (50.9), and resistance exercise (RE) (20.1), all outperforming the control group (SUCRA = 9.2).

CONCLUSION

AIE was the most effective modality for improving FMD, with MBE serving as a viable alternative for individuals with lower fitness or cardiovascular concerns. CE and ACE also provided benefits, while RE was less effective. Future studies should focus on long-term outcomes and personalized exercise strategies.

摘要

背景

肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张功能(FMD)是内皮功能的关键指标,在血糖控制异常的个体中常受损。虽然运动已被证明可改善肱动脉FMD,但不同运动方式的相对疗效仍不明确。本研究采用网状Meta分析(NMA)比较各种类型运动对FMD的影响。

方法

全面检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science和EBSCO数据库,以确定截至2025年1月评估运动对肱动脉FMD影响的随机对照试验。两名独立评审员筛选研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具第2版对符合条件的研究进行偏倚评估。使用Stata 16.0进行NMA。

结果

纳入了17项研究,共797名参与者(糖尿病前期:76名;2型糖尿病:721名)。有氧间歇运动(AIE)显著改善了FMD(MD = 2.23%,95%CI[1.09%-3.37%],P<0.05),其次是身心运动(MBE)(MD = 1.97%,95%CI[0.60%-3.33%],P<0.05)。联合运动(CE)(MD = 1.17%,95%CI[0.13%-2.21%],P<0.05)和有氧持续运动(ACE)(MD = 1.20%,95%CI[0.52%-1.87%],P<0.05)也显示出显著改善。累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值表明,AIE(89.0)和MBE(80.1)在改善FMD方面最有效,其次是CE(51.0)、ACE(50.9)和抗阻运动(RE)(20.1),均优于对照组(SUCRA = 9.2)。

结论

AIE是改善FMD最有效的运动方式,对于身体适应性较差或有心血管问题的个体,MBE是一种可行的替代方式。CE和ACE也有益处,而RE效果较差。未来的研究应关注长期结果和个性化运动策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e0/12338059/778d2dbb253a/peerj-13-19839-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验