He Yangxizhao, Lei Peng
China Center for Behavioral Economics and Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1537658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1537658. eCollection 2025.
Understanding mechanisms through which personality traits influence risk decision-making remains crucial in behavioral research. This study examined overconfidence as a mediator in personality-risk relationships, focusing on Extraversion and Negative Emotionality.
We recruited 110 university students to complete the Game of Dice Task, Big Five Inventory-2, and General Knowledge Questionnaire. Mediation analyses using bootstrapping methods examined direct and indirect effects with demographic controls.
Mediation analyses revealed distinct patterns. Extraversion demonstrated partial mediation through overconfidence (indirect effect: β = 0.101, 95% CI [0.012, 0.228]), explaining 20.5% of the total effect. Negative Emotionality showed complete mediation through overconfidence (indirect effect: β = -0.216, 95% CI [-0.364, -0.091]), accounting for 72.8% of the total effect. The models explained 29.4% and 22.9% of variance respectively.
These findings demonstrate that personality traits influence risk decisions through distinct pathways: Extraversion operates through both direct behavioral tendencies and cognitive biases, while Negative Emotionality primarily influences risk behavior through confidence calibration. Results provide implications for theoretical development and practical interventions, suggesting personality-tailored approaches to risk management.
在行为研究中,了解人格特质影响风险决策的机制仍然至关重要。本研究考察了过度自信作为人格与风险关系的中介变量,重点关注外向性和负性情绪。
我们招募了110名大学生完成掷骰子任务、大五人格量表-2和常识问卷。使用自助法进行中介分析,在控制人口统计学变量的情况下检验直接效应和间接效应。
中介分析揭示了不同的模式。外向性通过过度自信表现出部分中介作用(间接效应:β = 0.101,95%置信区间[0.012, 0.228]),解释了总效应的20.5%。负性情绪通过过度自信表现出完全中介作用(间接效应:β = -0.216,95%置信区间[-0.364, -0.091]),占总效应的72.8%。模型分别解释了29.4%和22.9%的方差。
这些发现表明,人格特质通过不同途径影响风险决策:外向性通过直接行为倾向和认知偏差起作用,而负性情绪主要通过信心校准影响风险行为。研究结果为理论发展和实际干预提供了启示,建议采用针对人格特质的风险管理方法。