• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于肺康复的简易与专用运动设备:一项随机临床试验

Minimal vs Specialized Exercise Equipment for Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Nolan Claire M, Glen Callum, Walsh Jessica A, Patel Suhani, Barker Ruth E, Polgar Oliver, Spain Nannette, Littlemore Hannah, Jung Peter, Edwards George D, Jenkins Timothy O, Harvey Jennifer, Ingram Karen, Newby Christopher, Steiner Michael, Wilson Rebecca, Gao Wei, Fiorentino Francesca, Chukwusa Emeka, May Peter, Maddocks Matthew, Man William D C

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.

Harefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526616. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26616.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26616
PMID:40794408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12344533/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise tolerance, symptom burden, and health-related quality of life for people with chronic respiratory conditions. However, demand for PR outstrips supply. Traditionally, PR has been delivered using specialist, gym-based exercise equipment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether PR using minimal equipment (PR-min) is noninferior to PR using specialist gym exercise equipment (PR-gym).

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This parallel, 2-group, assessor- and statistician-blinded, noninferiority randomized clinical trial compared PR-min with PR-gym. Eligible participants were people with chronic respiratory disease referred for PR to the Regional Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit in northwest London, UK. Recruitment occurred from October 15, 2018, to December 21, 2021, with a final follow-up to December 14, 2022. Randomization was by an independent web-based system using minimization with 1:1 allocation. Data analysis was performed from May 2023 to January 2025.

INTERVENTIONS

Both PR programs comprised 2 in-person, outpatient supervised sessions per week for 8 weeks. PR-min used minimal equipment (eg, walking circuit and body weight exercises), whereas PR-gym used specialist exercise equipment (eg, treadmills and weights machines).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in incremental shuttle walk (ISW) distance after PR (ie, at 8 weeks; with a predefined noninferiority margin of -24 m). Secondary outcomes included dyspnea, health-related quality of life, costs, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 436 participants (median [IQR] age, 71.7 [63.2-77.7] years; 239 [54.8%] male) were enrolled, with 218 randomized to PR-min and 218 to PR-gym. At 8 weeks, PR-min (n = 136) and PR-gym (n = 130) demonstrated significant improvements in ISW distance with no significant between-group difference in ISW distance change (mean, 1.7 m; 1-sided 97.5% CI lower bound, -16.8), which was within the -24-m noninferiority margin. The intention-to-treat analysis and a robust range of sensitivity analyses all demonstrated that PR-min was noninferior to PR-gym. Similar findings were observed for dyspnea and health-related quality of life. No excess adverse events or costs were seen with intervention.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that PR-min demonstrated noninferiority to PR-gym for exercise capacity, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life. PR-min can expand the number of settings where PR can be provided, thus improving patient accessibility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16196765.

摘要

重要性

肺康复(PR)可提高慢性呼吸道疾病患者的运动耐量、症状负担及与健康相关的生活质量。然而,肺康复的需求超过了供给。传统上,肺康复是通过专业的、基于健身房的运动设备来进行的。

目的

研究使用最少设备的肺康复(PR-min)是否不劣于使用专业健身房运动设备的肺康复(PR-gym)。

设计、地点和参与者:这项平行、两组、评估者和统计学家双盲的非劣效性随机临床试验将PR-min与PR-gym进行了比较。符合条件的参与者是被转诊至英国伦敦西北部地区肺康复科进行肺康复的慢性呼吸道疾病患者。招募时间为2018年10月15日至2021年12月21日,最终随访至2022年12月14日。随机分组通过一个独立的基于网络的系统,采用最小化法以1:1分配。数据分析于2023年5月至2025年1月进行。

干预措施

两个肺康复项目均包括每周2次门诊面对面监督训练,共8周。PR-min使用最少的设备(如步行回路和体重训练),而PR-gym使用专业运动设备(如跑步机和举重器械)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是肺康复后(即8周时)递增式往返步行(ISW)距离的变化(预设非劣效界值为-24米)。次要结局包括呼吸困难、与健康相关的生活质量、成本和不良事件。

结果

共纳入436名参与者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为71.7[63.2 - 77.7]岁;239名[54.8%]为男性),其中218名随机分配至PR-min组,218名分配至PR-gym组。在8周时,PR-min组(n = 136)和PR-gym组(n = 130)的ISW距离均有显著改善,两组间ISW距离变化无显著差异(均值为1.7米;单侧97.5%CI下限为-16.8),处于-24米的非劣效界值范围内。意向性分析和一系列稳健的敏感性分析均表明PR-min不劣于PR-gym。在呼吸困难和与健康相关的生活质量方面也观察到了类似的结果。干预后未发现额外的不良事件或成本。

结论和相关性

这项随机临床试验发现,PR-min在运动能力、呼吸困难和与健康相关的生活质量方面不劣于PR-gym。PR-min可以扩大能够提供肺康复的场所数量,从而提高患者的可及性。

试验注册

isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN16196765。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb4f/12344533/e89ff910cf9e/jamanetwopen-e2526616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb4f/12344533/ccede02900eb/jamanetwopen-e2526616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb4f/12344533/e89ff910cf9e/jamanetwopen-e2526616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb4f/12344533/ccede02900eb/jamanetwopen-e2526616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb4f/12344533/e89ff910cf9e/jamanetwopen-e2526616-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal vs Specialized Exercise Equipment for Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.用于肺康复的简易与专用运动设备:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526616. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26616.
2
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3.
3
Yoga or Strengthening Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.瑜伽或强化运动对膝关节骨关节炎的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253698. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3698.
4
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).吸气肌训练,联合或不联合肺康复治疗,用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 6;1(1):CD013778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013778.pub2.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Exercise for intermittent claudication.间歇性跛行的运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 26;12(12):CD000990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000990.pub4.
7
Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease.间质性肺疾病的肺康复治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 1;2(2):CD006322. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006322.pub4.
8
Pulmonary rehabilitation versus usual care for adults with asthma.肺康复治疗与常规护理对哮喘成人的影响比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD013485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013485.pub2.
9
Outcomes of specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder: the Physio4FMD RCT.功能性运动障碍专科物理治疗的效果:Physio4FMD随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(34):1-28. doi: 10.3310/MKAC9495.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
British Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on pulmonary rehabilitation.英国胸科学会关于肺康复的临床声明。
Thorax. 2023 Oct;78(Suppl 4):s2-s15. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220439.
2
Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Adults with Chronic Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.慢性呼吸疾病成人的肺康复:美国胸科学会临床实践指南
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 15;208(4):e7-e26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1066ST.
3
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Using Minimal Equipment for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
使用最少设备进行慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺康复:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2023 May 4;103(5). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad013.
4
Research priorities to address the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the next decade.未来十年应对全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)负担的研究重点。
J Glob Health. 2021 Oct 9;11:15003. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.15003. eCollection 2021.
5
Minimal versus specialist equipment in the delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation: protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.最小化设备与专业设备在肺康复治疗中的应用比较:一项非劣效性随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 18;11(10):e047524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047524.
6
The statistical approach in trial-based economic evaluations matters: get your statistics together!基于试验的经济评估中的统计方法很重要:请整理好您的统计数据!
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 19;21(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06513-1.
7
Supervised pulmonary rehabilitation using minimal or specialist exercise equipment in COPD: a propensity-matched analysis.使用最少或专业运动设备进行 COPD 的监督肺康复:倾向匹配分析。
Thorax. 2021 Mar;76(3):264-271. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215281. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
8
Effects of Combined Aerobic-Strength Training vs Fitness Education Program in COPD Patients.有氧运动与力量训练联合干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响
Int J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;38(13):1001-1008. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112339. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Australian and New Zealand Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines.澳大利亚和新西兰肺康复指南。
Respirology. 2017 May;22(4):800-819. doi: 10.1111/resp.13025. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的EQ-5D-5L健康状况问卷:效度、反应度和最小重要差异
Thorax. 2016 Jun;71(6):493-500. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207782. Epub 2016 Mar 30.