Ko Mie Thu, Rizwanullah Agha, Jafri Zain, Fung Adriel, Alexandre Leo
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Dis Esophagus. 2025 Jul 3;38(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaf062.
Chemoprevention of Barrett's esophagus (BE) represents an opportunity to reduce the burden of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the assumed causal association between proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), aspirin and statins, and BE progression, and undertook a comprehensive risk of bias (RoB) assessment. The protocol was prospectively registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024532338). Sixteen observational studies and one randomized controlled trial were identified. PPIs and statins were associated with a 54% (adjusted OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.86; P = 0.02) and 47% (adjusted OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.37-0.74; P < 0.001) reduced odds of progression, and aspirin use was not significantly associated (adjusted OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.65-1.08; P = 0.17). Among observational studies, 6 were at critical RoB and 10 were at serious RoB. The only trial included was at low RoB and reported no significant associations for aspirin and PPI comparisons and high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/EAC. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations certainty of evidence was very low. All observational studies were at serious or critical RoB. Trial evidence was at low RoB and did not demonstrate any significant differences between aspirin and PPI comparisons for the outcome of HGD/EAC. Given the very low certainty of evidence, there is little rationale to recommend these medications for chemoprevention in BE.
巴雷特食管(BE)的化学预防为减轻食管腺癌(EAC)负担提供了契机。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、阿司匹林和他汀类药物与BE进展之间假定的因果关联,并进行了全面的偏倚风险(RoB)评估。该方案已前瞻性注册(PROSPERO编号:CRD42024532338)。共纳入16项观察性研究和1项随机对照试验。PPI和他汀类药物与进展几率降低54%(调整后OR 0.46;95%CI 0.25 - 0.86;P = 0.02)和47%(调整后OR 0.53;95%CI 0.37 - 0.74;P < 0.001)相关,而使用阿司匹林无显著关联(调整后OR 0.84;95%CI 0.65 - 1.08;P = 0.17)。在观察性研究中,6项处于关键RoB,10项处于严重RoB。纳入的唯一一项试验处于低RoB,且报告阿司匹林和PPI比较与高级别异型增生(HGD)/EAC无显著关联。推荐分级、评估、制定与评价证据的确定性非常低。所有观察性研究均处于严重或关键RoB。试验证据处于低RoB,且在HGD/EAC结局方面,阿司匹林和PPI比较未显示任何显著差异。鉴于证据确定性极低,几乎没有理由推荐这些药物用于BE的化学预防。