Berger Daniel J, Jenkins Colin, Wong-Castillo John, Jonik Sarahrose, Gordon Nancy P
Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
University of California, San Francisco, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, San Francisco, California.
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 11;26(4):951-959. doi: 10.5811/westjem.41511.
Emergency department (ED) use varies by age, sex, race, ethnicity, language preference, and payor type. Most studies comparing ED use by patients with English vs non-English preference (ELP/NELP) have used racially aggregated data, potentially masking differences across population subgroups. In this study we aimed to disaggregate the associations of race, ethnicity, language preference, and Medicaid coverage with ED utilization.
We used cross-sectional study electronic health record data for 2,047,105 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members who were 25 - 85 years of age in January 2019 and had been continuous health plan members during 2018 - 2019. We tabulated the percentages of adults in seven racial and ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, South Asian) within three age groups (25 - 44, 45 - 64, 65 - 85) who had ≥1 ED visit in 2019. Modified log-Poisson regression was used to examine racial, ethnic, and language preference differences after adjusting for demographic and Medicaid status covariates.
The study population was 51.8% White, 53.2% female, 9.6% NELP, and 6.2% Medicaid-insured. Overall, 18% had ≥ 1 ED visit. Compared with White adults, Black and Hispanic adults were more likely and Chinese, Vietnamese, and South Asian adults were less likely to have ≥ 1 ED visit. After adjusting for all covariates, NELP adults 25 - 64 years of age were 10% less likely to have had an ED visit. However, while NELP was associated with a 10-20% lower ED visit prevalence among Hispanic, Filipino, Chinese, and Vietnamese adults 25 - 64, the prevalence was 10% higher among White and South Asian adults 45 - 64 and Filipino and South Asian adults aged 65 - 85. Adults with Medicaid coverage aged 25 - 64 were twice as likely and adults aged 65 - 85 were 50% more likely to have had ≥ 1 ED visit.
This study of a US adult health-plan membership found several significant differences in ED use across racial, ethnic, and language subgroups and a higher prevalence of ED use by Medicaid-covered adults ≤ 65 years of age in most racial and ethnic groups. Our findings highlight the importance of using disaggregated data, particularly for Asian ethnic groups, when comparing ED use in different populations. Further research is needed to identify similarities and differences in social, personal, and policy factors driving ED use in diverse adult populations to better inform population-specific health interventions.
急诊科(ED)的使用情况因年龄、性别、种族、民族、语言偏好和付款人类型而异。大多数比较英语偏好(ELP)与非英语偏好(NELP)患者急诊科使用情况的研究使用的是种族汇总数据,这可能掩盖了不同人群亚组之间的差异。在本研究中,我们旨在剖析种族、民族、语言偏好和医疗补助覆盖情况与急诊科利用率之间的关联。
我们使用了横断面研究的电子健康记录数据,数据来自2019年1月年龄在25 - 85岁之间且在2018 - 2019年期间一直是健康计划成员的2,047,105名北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团成员。我们列出了三个年龄组(25 - 44岁、45 - 64岁、65 - 85岁)中七个种族和民族群体(白人、黑人、西班牙裔、华裔、菲律宾裔、越南裔、南亚裔)中在2019年有≥1次急诊科就诊经历的成年人的百分比。在调整了人口统计学和医疗补助状况协变量后,使用修正的对数泊松回归来检验种族、民族和语言偏好差异。
研究人群中51.8%为白人,53.2%为女性,9.6%为非英语偏好者,6.2%有医疗补助保险。总体而言,18%的人有≥1次急诊科就诊经历。与白人成年人相比,黑人和西班牙裔成年人更有可能,而华裔、越南裔和南亚裔成年人不太可能有≥1次急诊科就诊经历。在调整了所有协变量后,25 - 64岁的非英语偏好成年人急诊科就诊的可能性降低了10%。然而,虽然在25 - 64岁的西班牙裔、菲律宾裔、华裔和越南裔成年人中,非英语偏好与急诊科就诊患病率降低10 - 20%相关,但在45 - 64岁的白人和南亚裔成年人以及65 - 85岁的菲律宾裔和南亚裔成年人中,患病率高10%。25 - 64岁有医疗补助覆盖的成年人急诊科就诊可能性是其他人的两倍,65 - 85岁的成年人则高50%。
这项针对美国成年健康计划成员的研究发现,不同种族、民族和语言亚组在急诊科使用方面存在若干显著差异,并且在大多数种族和民族群体中,≤65岁有医疗补助覆盖的成年人急诊科使用率更高。我们的研究结果凸显了在比较不同人群的急诊科使用情况时使用分类数据的重要性,特别是对于亚洲民族群体。需要进一步研究以确定在不同成年人群体中推动急诊科使用的社会、个人和政策因素的异同,以便更好地为针对特定人群的健康干预提供信息。