Normand Sharon-Lise, Leckman-Westin Emily, Finnerty Molly, Jeong Junghye, Tsuei Jeannette, Zelevinsky Katya, Chen Qingxian, Horvitz-Lennon Marcela
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454776. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54776.
Delivery of mental health care through telehealth (telemental health care) increased after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the speed of adoption (diffusion) of telemental health in the care in the care of individuals with schizophrenia.
To characterize telemental health care diffusion in mental health agencies serving Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and the beneficiary-level association of telemental health care use with race and ethnicity.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used New York State Medicaid data from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020 (prepandemic period), and from March 11, 2020, to March 31, 2021 (pandemic period), from 261 agencies serving 30 990 beneficiaries with schizophrenia with 1 or more mental health visits during the pandemic period. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2021 through September 2024.
Agency percentage of patients belonging to racial and ethnic minority groups among all Medicaid-covered patients between March 2019 and February 2020; agency type, categorized as freestanding, hospital affiliated, or state operated; beneficiary-level race and ethnicity, categorized as Asian or other (American Indian or Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander), Black, Latinx, White, and unknown; and pandemic severity, operationalized as COVID-19 hospitalization rates per 10 000 population in administratively defined catchment areas.
Days to 10% cumulative telemental health care use within agencies, as well as beneficiary-level time to first telemental health care visit and any telemental health care visit in catchment areas in times of varying pandemic severity.
In this cohort study of 261 agencies (18 [7%] state operated, 79 [30%] hospital affiliated, and 164 [63%] free standing) and 30 990 beneficiaries with schizophrenia (mean [SD] age, 43 [13] years; 59% male; 7% Asian or other, 38% Black, 20% Latinx, and 25% White), 6 agencies (2%) never adopted telemental health care, and 248 (95%) reached 10% cumulative telemental health care visits in a mean of 18 days. Mean (SD) agency prepandemic shares of beneficiaries belonging to racial or ethnic minority groups (56% [23%]) were not associated with telemental health care diffusion. Diffusion was faster in state-operated vs free-standing agencies (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44 [95% CI, 1.21-4.95]). Relative to White beneficiaries, time to first telemental health care visit was slower in every racial and ethnic minority group (Asian or other: HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98]; Black: HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.87-0.93]; Latinx: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.91-0.99]). Beneficiaries from at least 1 racial or ethnic minority group were less likely than White beneficiaries to have a telemental health care visit regardless of pandemic severity and area; differences narrowed when pandemic severity was higher (eg, in New York City, the odds ratio of Black beneficiaries having a telemental health care visit relative to White beneficiaries when the pandemic severity was high was 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63-0.79] but decreased to 0.59 [95% CI, 0.53-0.67] when the pandemic severity was low).
In this cohort study of Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia, telemental health care diffused rapidly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in state-operated agencies. Together, agency-level and beneficiary-level race and ethnicity findings suggest within-agency racial and ethnic differences in diffusion of telemental health care. States should monitor the diffusion of innovations across vulnerable populations.
在2019冠状病毒病大流行开始后,通过远程医疗提供心理健康护理(远程心理健康护理)的情况有所增加。对于精神分裂症患者护理中远程心理健康护理的采用(传播)速度,人们知之甚少。
描述为患有精神分裂症的医疗补助受益人提供服务的心理健康机构中远程心理健康护理的传播情况,以及远程心理健康护理使用与种族和族裔在受益人层面的关联。
设计、背景和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了纽约州医疗补助数据,时间跨度为2019年3月1日至2020年2月29日(大流行前时期),以及2020年3月11日至2021年3月31日(大流行时期),数据来自261个机构,这些机构为30990名患有精神分裂症且在大流行期间有1次或更多次心理健康就诊的受益人提供服务。统计分析于2021年11月至2024年9月进行。
2019年3月至2020年2月期间,所有医疗补助覆盖患者中属于少数种族和族裔群体的患者在机构中的百分比;机构类型,分为独立机构、医院附属机构或州立机构;受益人层面的种族和族裔,分为亚洲人或其他(美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民;夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民)、黑人拉丁裔、白人以及未知;大流行严重程度,以行政定义的集水区每10000人口中的2019冠状病毒病住院率来衡量。
各机构内累计10%的患者开始使用远程心理健康护理所需的天数,以及在不同大流行严重程度时期,受益人层面首次进行远程心理健康护理就诊和在集水区进行任何远程心理健康护理就诊的时间。
在这项对261个机构(18个[7%]为州立机构,79个[30%]为医院附属机构,164个[63%]为独立机构)和30990名患有精神分裂症的受益人(平均[标准差]年龄为43[13]岁;59%为男性;7%为亚洲人或其他,38%为黑人,20%为拉丁裔,25%为白人)的队列研究中,6个机构(2%)从未采用远程心理健康护理,248个机构(95%)平均在18天内达到了10%的累计远程心理健康护理就诊率。各机构在大流行前属于少数种族或族裔群体的受益人所占份额平均(标准差)为56%[23%],与远程心理健康护理的传播无关。州立机构的传播速度比独立机构更快(风险比[HR],2.44[95%置信区间,1.21 - 4.95])。相对于白人受益人,每个少数种族和族裔群体首次进行远程心理健康护理就诊的时间都更慢(亚洲人或其他:HR,0.93[95%置信区间,0.88 - 0.98];黑人:HR,0.90[95%置信区间,0.87 - 0.93];拉丁裔:HR,0.95[95%置信区间,0.91 - 0.99])。无论大流行严重程度和地区如何,至少有一个少数种族或族裔群体的受益人进行远程心理健康护理就诊的可能性低于白人受益人;当大流行严重程度较高时,差异会缩小(例如,在纽约市,当大流行严重程度较高时,黑人受益人进行远程心理健康护理就诊相对于白人受益人的优势比为0.70[95%置信区间,0.63 - 0.79],但当大流行严重程度较低时,降至0.59[95%置信区间,0.53 - 0.67])。
在这项对患有精神分裂症的医疗补助受益人的队列研究中,2019冠状病毒病大流行开始后,远程心理健康护理迅速传播,尤其是在州立机构。综合机构层面和受益人层面的种族和族裔研究结果表明,远程心理健康护理在机构内部的传播存在种族和族裔差异。各州应监测创新措施在弱势群体中的传播情况。