Norton Vicki, Schreyer Kraftin E, Kuhn Diane
Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States.
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 4;3(8):qxaf134. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf134. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Emergency department (ED) boarding, or holding admitted patients in the ED due to a lack of available inpatient beds, presents a major challenge to healthcare systems. This study examines the impacts of ED boarding on clinician wellness, burnout, moral injury, and workplace violence.
We distributed a survey to members of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine over 4 weeks in early 2025. It included 9 questions on experiences with boarding, demographics, and practice setting, plus an optional free-response question. Descriptive statistics were performed, and free-response questions were explored for insight and broader themes.
Among 195 respondents, 54.1% reported experiencing violence related to ED boarding, and 98.5% reported an impact on job satisfaction. Ninety-six respondents submitted free-text comments, which reflected 4 major themes: frustration and burnout; verbal and physical abuse; moral injury tied to profit-driven decision-making; and impacts on clinical care and patient outcomes.
These preliminary findings that highlight additional adverse outcomes of boarding can be used to inform future policy decisions and clinical operations interventions to reduce and mitigate effects of ED boarding.
急诊科滞留,即因缺乏可用的住院床位而将已收治的患者留在急诊科,给医疗系统带来了重大挑战。本研究探讨了急诊科滞留对临床医生健康、职业倦怠、道德伤害和工作场所暴力的影响。
在2025年初的4周内,我们向美国急诊医学学会的成员发放了一份调查问卷。问卷包括9个关于滞留经历、人口统计学和执业环境的问题,以及一个可选的自由回答问题。进行了描述性统计,并对自由回答问题进行了探索,以获取见解和更广泛的主题。
在195名受访者中,54.1%报告经历过与急诊科滞留相关的暴力事件,98.5%报告对工作满意度有影响。96名受访者提交了自由文本评论,反映了4个主要主题:沮丧和职业倦怠;言语和身体虐待;与利润驱动决策相关的道德伤害;以及对临床护理和患者结局的影响。
这些初步发现突出了滞留的其他不良后果,可用于为未来的政策决策和临床操作干预提供信息,以减少和减轻急诊科滞留的影响。