Suppr超能文献

超声引导下外斜肌肋间平面阻滞与胸段竖脊肌阻滞用于开胸术后疼痛的比较:一项随机双盲非劣效性临床研究

Ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block versus thoracic erector spinae block for post-thoracotomy pain: A randomised double-blinded non-inferior clinical study.

作者信息

Moharam Saad A, ElSharkawy Mohammed S, Almohasseb Mhmoud A, Hamama Khaled, Mahmoud Mohamed A, Abogabal Marwa A

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Aug;69(8):809-815. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_3_25. Epub 2025 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Regional techniques are preferred for controlling post-thoracotomy pain due to lower complication rates. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) with thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for post-thoracotomy pain.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, non-inferior clinical study involved 60 cases scheduled for thoracic surgery. Cases were randomly allocated into two groups: ESPB and EOIB groups. Using 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of the thoracic vertebrae 5, both blocks were performed after induction of general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were time to first rescue analgesic request postoperatively, numerical rating scale (NRS) score during rest and with coughing, and occurrence of complications. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for non-normally distributed variables, the Student's -test was used for normally distributed variables, and the Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. The significance level was set at ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients who required intraoperative fentanyl, time of first request for analgesia, total morphine consumption, and pain score within the first 24 hours post-surgery were comparable between the two groups ( = 0.347, 0.085, and 0.354, respectively). Both groups exhibited comparable incidences of hypotension and bradycardia ( = 0.353 and > 0.99, respectively). Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) and pneumothorax did not occur in any patient in either group.

CONCLUSION

The analgesic effect of EOIB was non-inferior to ESPB for post-thoracotomy pain, as evidenced by comparable total opioid consumption, time of first request for analgesia, and pain score in the first 24 hours post-surgery. Additionally, EOIB demonstrated the same level of safety as ESPB.

摘要

背景与目的

由于并发症发生率较低,区域技术更常用于控制开胸术后疼痛。本研究旨在比较超声引导下的腹外斜肌肋间阻滞(EOIB)与胸椎竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)用于开胸术后疼痛的镇痛效果及安全性。

方法

这项随机、双盲、非劣效性临床研究纳入了60例行胸外科手术的患者。患者被随机分为两组:ESPB组和EOIB组。在全身麻醉诱导后,于第5胸椎水平使用30 mL 0.25%布比卡因进行两种阻滞。主要结局指标为术后24小时内吗啡用量。次要结局指标为术后首次要求补救镇痛的时间、静息及咳嗽时的数字评分量表(NRS)评分以及并发症的发生情况。对于非正态分布变量采用非参数Wilcoxon检验,对于正态分布变量采用Student's t检验,对于定性变量采用卡方/ Fisher精确检验。显著性水平设定为≤0.05。

结果

两组患者术中需要芬太尼的情况、首次镇痛请求时间、术后24小时内吗啡总用量以及疼痛评分相当(分别为=0.347、0.085和0.354)。两组低血压和心动过缓的发生率相当(分别为=0.353和>0.99)。两组均无患者发生局部麻醉药全身毒性反应(LAST)和气胸。

结论

开胸术后疼痛方面,EOIB的镇痛效果不劣于ESPB,术后24小时内的总阿片类药物消耗量、首次镇痛请求时间和疼痛评分相当即证明了这一点。此外,EOIB与ESPB具有相同的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1a7/12338484/9fac47a8cfc2/IJA-69-809-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验