Yamaguchi Junichi, Arashi Hiroyuki, Hagiwara Nobuhisa, Yasuda Satoshi, Kaikita Koichi, Akao Masaharu, Ako Junya, Matoba Tetsuya, Nakamura Masato, Miyauchi Katsumi, Matsui Kunihiko, Ogawa Hisao
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2611.
Antithrombotic therapy is crucial for older patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) who are at a high risk of bleeding and thrombotic events.
To examine the age-stratified effects of rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with those of rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet agent combination therapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) open-label randomized clinical trial. This was a multicenter study conducted in Japan from February 23, 2015, to July 31, 2018. Patients with AF and stable CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting 1 or more years earlier or who had angiographically confirmed CAD that did not require revascularization were enrolled. Participants were stratified into 4 groups by age (<70 years, 70-74 years, 75-79 years, and ≥80 years). Study data were analyzed from August 2024 to July 2025.
Rivaroxaban monotherapy or rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet agent therapy.
The primary efficacy end point was a major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause. The primary safety end point was major bleeding.
This study included a total of 2215 participants (mean [SD] age, 74.3 [8.2] years; 1751 male [79.1%]). The incidence of primary efficacy end points per patient-year for rivaroxaban monotherapy vs rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet agent therapy was 3.2% vs 4.3% (<70 years), 3.2% vs 2.8% (70-74 years), 3.8% vs 5.3% (75-79 years), and 6.2% vs 10.3% (≥80 years). The hazard ratios were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.40-1.37) for those younger than 70 years, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.55-2.45) for those aged 70 to 74 years, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.41-1.26) for those aged 75 to 79 years, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.40-0.93) for those 80 years and older (P for interaction =.51). For the primary safety end points, the incidence was 0.5% vs 2.3% (<70 years), 2.2% vs 2.4% (70-74 years), 1.1% vs 2.1% (75-79 years), and 2.9% vs 4.3% (≥80 years). The hazard ratios were 0.23 (95% CI, 0.06-0.79) for those younger than 70 years, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.39-2.15) for those aged 70 to 74 years, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.19-1.42) for those aged 75 to 79 years, and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.35-1.27) for those 80 years and older (P for interaction =.33).
Results of this post hoc analysis of the AFIRE randomized clinical trial reveal that rivaroxaban monotherapy reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events and major bleeding across the broad range of age in patients with AF and stable CAD. Possible age-related differences in trends, with more pronounced efficacy in older patients and more pronounced safety in younger patients, should be considered as hypothesis generating and require further research.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642419.
抗栓治疗对于患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和心房颤动(AF)且有高出血和血栓形成事件风险的老年患者至关重要。
研究利伐沙班单药治疗与利伐沙班加抗血小板药物联合治疗的年龄分层效果。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项对稳定冠状动脉疾病患者使用利伐沙班治疗心房颤动和缺血事件(AFIRE)开放标签随机临床试验的事后二次分析。这是一项于2015年2月23日至2018年7月31日在日本进行的多中心研究。纳入了1年或更早前接受过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉搭桥手术的AF和稳定CAD患者,或血管造影证实有CAD但无需血运重建的患者。参与者按年龄分为4组(<70岁、70 - 74岁、75 - 79岁和≥80岁)。研究数据于2024年8月至2025年7月进行分析。
利伐沙班单药治疗或利伐沙班加抗血小板药物治疗。
主要疗效终点是主要不良心血管事件,定义为卒中、全身性栓塞、心肌梗死、需要血运重建的不稳定型心绞痛或任何原因导致的死亡的复合事件。主要安全终点是大出血。
本研究共纳入2215名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,74.3[8.2]岁;1751名男性[79.1%])。利伐沙班单药治疗与利伐沙班加抗血小板药物治疗相比,每位患者年的主要疗效终点发生率分别为3.2%对4.3%(<70岁)、3.2%对2.8%(70 - 74岁)、3.8%对5.3%(75 - 79岁)和6.2%对10.3%(≥80岁)。年龄小于70岁者的风险比为0.74(95%CI,0.40 - 1.37),70至74岁者为1.16(95%CI,0.55 - 2.45),75至79岁者为0.72(95%CI,0.41 - 1.26),80岁及以上者为0.61(95%CI,0.40 - 0.93)(交互作用P = 0.51)。对于主要安全终点,发生率分别为0.5%对2.3%(<70岁)、2.2%对2.4%(70 - 74岁)