Suppr超能文献

阅读意义:中风后语义阅读障碍的神经认知基础。

Meaning for reading: the neurocognitive basis of semantic reading impairment after stroke.

作者信息

Staples Ryan, Dickens J Vivian, Dyslin Sara M, DeMarco Andrew T, Snider Sarah F, Friedman Rhonda B, Turkeltaub Peter E

机构信息

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Brain. 2025 Sep 3;148(9):3108-3120. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf253.

Abstract

Diagnosis of alexia has historically focused on syndromes such as surface alexia, which capture discrete patterns of reading deficits observed in some patients but do not describe the breadth of reading deficits observed in practice. Aphasia research has recently shifted focus to language process impairments rather than syndromic classifications. A similar shift in focus to reading process impairments might improve our diagnostic approach to alexia. Behavioural evidence suggests that semantic processing influences reading aloud and that semantic deficits in the context of semantic dementia underlie surface alexia. Because stroke rarely causes loss of semantic knowledge and surface alexia as a syndromic diagnosis is unusual after stroke, semantic reading deficits in stroke alexia have not previously been examined systematically. Semantic reading deficits in stroke may not relate to semantic deficits per se, but rather an inability to use semantics to support reading. Imageability, the degree to which a word brings to mind an image, is one index of semantic influences on reading. High-imageability words are read more quickly by healthy persons and more accurately following brain damage. Here, we test whether deficits of semantic reading after stroke, as indexed by reduced imageability effects, result from semantic or post-semantic processes. Examining non-verbal semantic processing, semantics-phonology mapping and semantic control in 56 left-hemisphere stroke survivors, only better semantics-phonology mapping ability predicted better accuracy on high-imageability words. Neither semantic nor post-semantic scores related to low-imageability word accuracy. Support vector regression voxel-based lesion symptom mapping revealed that damage along the superior temporal sulcus and underlying white matter, extending into the middle and superior temporal gyri, reduced the advantage of high-imageability over low-imageability words during reading, reflecting an inability to use semantics to support reading. A similar cluster related to impairments in semantics-phonology mapping. The imageability and semantics-phonology mapping results overlapped in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus. Support vector regression connectome lesion symptom mapping revealed that white matter disconnections within a broad temporoparietal network important for phonological and semantic processing were associated with a reduction of the imageability advantage during reading. These results demonstrate that, irrespective of syndromic classification, semantic reading deficits occur in left-hemisphere stroke survivors owing to impaired integration of semantic and phonological representations and that the left posterior superior temporal sulcus underlies this process. Our results clarify the neurobiology of reading aloud and support the existence of a post-semantic impairment of semantic reading in left-hemisphere stroke survivors.

摘要

从历史上看,失读症的诊断主要集中在诸如表层失读症等综合征上,这些综合征捕捉到了一些患者中观察到的离散阅读缺陷模式,但并未描述实际中观察到的阅读缺陷的广度。失语症研究最近已将重点转向语言加工障碍而非综合征分类。类似地,将重点转向阅读加工障碍可能会改善我们对失读症的诊断方法。行为证据表明,语义加工会影响大声朗读,并且语义性痴呆背景下的语义缺陷是表层失读症的基础。由于中风很少导致语义知识丧失,且中风后作为综合征诊断的表层失读症并不常见,因此中风后失读症中的语义阅读缺陷以前尚未得到系统研究。中风后的语义阅读缺陷可能并非与语义缺陷本身相关,而是与无法利用语义来支持阅读有关。可想象性,即一个词唤起图像的程度,是语义对阅读影响的一个指标。健康人阅读具有高可想象性的词速度更快,脑损伤后阅读得更准确。在此,我们测试中风后以可想象性效应降低为指标的语义阅读缺陷是由语义过程还是后语义过程导致的。对56名左半球中风幸存者的非言语语义加工、语义 - 语音映射和语义控制进行检查后发现,只有更好的语义 - 语音映射能力能预测对高可想象性词的更高准确性。语义和后语义分数均与低可想象性词的准确性无关。基于支持向量回归的体素损伤症状映射显示,沿颞上沟及其下方白质的损伤,延伸至颞中回和颞上回,会降低阅读过程中高可想象性词相对于低可想象性词的优势,这反映出无法利用语义来支持阅读。一个类似的簇与语义 - 语音映射障碍有关。可想象性和语义 - 语音映射结果在左后颞上沟重叠。基于支持向量回归的脑连接组损伤症状映射显示,对于语音和语义加工很重要的广泛颞顶网络内的白质连接中断与阅读过程中可想象性优势的降低有关。这些结果表明,无论综合征分类如何,左半球中风幸存者中都会出现语义阅读缺陷,这是由于语义和语音表征的整合受损所致,并且左后颞上沟是这一过程的基础。我们的结果阐明了大声朗读的神经生物学机制,并支持左半球中风幸存者中存在语义阅读的后语义损伤。

相似文献

1
Meaning for reading: the neurocognitive basis of semantic reading impairment after stroke.
Brain. 2025 Sep 3;148(9):3108-3120. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf253.
4
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.
5
The agreement of phonetic transcriptions between paediatric speech and language therapists transcribing a disordered speech sample.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1981-1995. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13043. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
9
Phonological, orthographic, and semantic processing during sentence reading in adults with dyslexia: Behavioral and neural correlates.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2025 Aug;214:113209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.113209. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
10
Perplexity of utterances in untreated first-episode psychosis: an ultra-high field MRI dynamic causal modelling study of the semantic network.
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2024 Aug 9;49(4):E252-E262. doi: 10.1503/jpn.240031. Print 2024 Jul-Aug.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验