Yamanaka Kousuke, Hasegawa Takaaki, Matsuda Yoshinobu, Inoue Shinichiro, Tanimukai Hitoshi, Wada Saho, Kako Jun
Iwao Pharmacy Japanese Red Cross Hospital Front Mitasu Ise Branch, Ise, 516-0008, Japan.
Center for Psycho-Oncology and Palliative Care, Nagoya City University Hospital, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02850-x.
Delirium is a common and distressing symptom in patients with cancer, while opioids-which are essential in managing cancer pain-can cause delirium. Opioid switching is a widely used strategy for the management of opioid-induced delirium; however, its efficacy is yet to be verified. This systematic review aimed to determine opioid switching's efficacy and safety for managing opioid-induced delirium in patients with cancer.
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We searched four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, Cochrane Library, and Ichishi-Web) on September 6, 2023, with an updated PubMed search on October 20, 2024. Our review included studies on opioid switching for managing delirium in patients with cancer. If there were less than two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we included observational studies. Data extraction and evaluation were independently conducted by two reviewers using the GRADE evaluation. The study protocol was registered (UMIN000051787).
The literature search identified seven observational studies without a control group; however, no RCTs were found. Four observational studies reported improvements in the severity of delirium symptoms. No study reported worsening pain or dyspnea after opioid switching. According to the GRADE framework, all outcomes were graded very low on certainty.
Although observational studies imply opioid switching's effectiveness for managing opioid-induced delirium in patients with cancer, there is a lack of RCTs and the level of evidence is very low. Thus, RCTs are warranted to confirm opioid switching's efficacy.
谵妄是癌症患者常见且令人痛苦的症状,而阿片类药物——在控制癌症疼痛中必不可少——可导致谵妄。阿片类药物转换是治疗阿片类药物所致谵妄的一种广泛使用的策略;然而,其疗效尚未得到证实。本系统评价旨在确定阿片类药物转换在治疗癌症患者阿片类药物所致谵妄方面的疗效和安全性。
本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行。2023年9月6日,我们检索了四个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane对照试验注册库、Cochrane图书馆和医中志网络),并于2024年10月20日对PubMed进行了更新检索。我们的评价纳入了关于阿片类药物转换治疗癌症患者谵妄的研究。如果随机对照试验(RCT)少于两项,我们纳入观察性研究。两名评价者使用GRADE评价法独立进行数据提取和评估。研究方案已注册(UMIN000051787)。
文献检索确定了七项无对照组的观察性研究;然而,未发现RCT。四项观察性研究报告了谵妄症状严重程度的改善。没有研究报告阿片类药物转换后疼痛或呼吸困难加重。根据GRADE框架,所有结局的确定性等级均为极低。
尽管观察性研究表明阿片类药物转换对治疗癌症患者阿片类药物所致谵妄有效,但缺乏RCT且证据水平非常低。因此,有必要进行RCT以证实阿片类药物转换的疗效。