Suppr超能文献

在急性姑息治疗病房中,针对癌症和谵妄患者的终末期激越的神经阻滞剂策略:一项单中心、双盲、平行组、随机试验。

Neuroleptic strategies for terminal agitation in patients with cancer and delirium at an acute palliative care unit: a single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21(7):989-998. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30307-7. Epub 2020 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of neuroleptics for terminal agitated delirium is controversial. We assessed the effect of three neuroleptic strategies on refractory agitation in patients with cancer with terminal delirium.

METHODS

In this single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial, patients with advanced cancer, aged at least 18 years, admitted to the palliative and supportive care unit at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA), with refractory agitation, despite low-dose haloperidol, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous haloperidol dose escalation at 2 mg every 4 h, neuroleptic rotation with chlorpromazine at 25 mg every 4 h, or combined haloperidol at 1 mg and chlorpromazine at 12·5 mg every 4 h, until death or discharge. Rescue doses identical to the scheduled doses were administered at inception, and then hourly as needed. Permuted block randomisation (block size six; 1:1:1) was done, stratified by baseline Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores. Research staff, clinicians, patients, and caregivers were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was change in RASS score from time 0 to 24 h. Comparisons among group were done by modified intention-to-treat analysis. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03021486.

FINDINGS

Between July 5, 2017, and July 1, 2019, 998 patients were screened for eligibility, with 68 being enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment; 45 received the masked study interventions (escalation n=15, rotation n=16, combination n=14). RASS score decreased significantly within 30 min and remained low at 24 h in the escalation group (n=10, mean RASS score change between 0 h and 24 h -3·6 [95% CI -5·0 to -2·2]), rotation group (n=11, -3·3 [-4·4 to -2·2]), and combination group (n=10, -3·0 [-4·6 to -1·4]), with no difference among groups (p=0·71). The most common serious toxicity was hypotension (escalation n=6 [40%], rotation n=5 [31%], combination n=3 [21%]); there were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Our data provide preliminary evidence that the three strategies of neuroleptics might reduce agitation in patients with terminal agitation. These findings are in the context of the single-centre design, small sample size, and lack of a placebo-only group.

FUNDING

National Institute of Nursing Research.

摘要

背景

神经安定剂在终末期激越中的作用存在争议。我们评估了三种神经安定剂策略对终末期谵妄伴难治性激越的癌症患者的影响。

方法

在这项单中心、双盲、平行组、随机试验中,纳入了年龄至少 18 岁、因难治性激越而入住美国德克萨斯大学 MD 安德森癌症中心姑息治疗和支持护理病房的晚期癌症患者,在给予低剂量氟哌啶醇后仍有激越,患者被随机分配接受 2 mg 每 4 h 递增的静脉氟哌啶醇剂量、每 4 h 25 mg 的氯丙嗪转用或每 4 h 1 mg 氟哌啶醇和 12.5 mg 氯丙嗪联合治疗,直至死亡或出院。在起始时和需要时每小时给予与计划剂量相同的解救剂量。采用区组随机化(区组大小为 6;1:1:1),按基线 Richmond 激越镇静量表(RASS)评分分层。研究人员、临床医生、患者和护理人员对分组均设盲。主要结局为从 0 小时到 24 小时 RASS 评分的变化。采用意向治疗分析对组间比较。这项完成的研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03021486。

结果

2017 年 7 月 5 日至 2019 年 7 月 1 日,对 998 例患者进行了入组筛选,其中 68 例患者入组并随机分配接受治疗;45 例患者接受了盲法研究干预(递增组 n=15,转用组 n=16,联合组 n=14)。在 30 分钟内,递增组(n=10,0 小时至 24 小时 RASS 评分变化 -3.6 [95%CI -5.0 至 -2.2])、转用组(n=11,-3.3 [-4.4 至 -2.2])和联合组(n=10,-3.0 [-4.6 至 -1.4])的 RASS 评分显著降低,组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.71)。最常见的严重毒性为低血压(递增组 n=6 [40%],转用组 n=5 [31%],联合组 n=3 [21%]);无治疗相关死亡。

结论

我们的数据初步提供了证据,表明三种神经安定剂策略可能会降低终末期激越患者的激越。这些发现是基于单中心设计、样本量小和缺乏安慰剂对照组的背景。

资金来源

美国国立护理研究院。

相似文献

5
Drug therapy for delirium in terminally ill adults.晚期成年患者谵妄的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 21;1(1):CD004770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004770.pub3.

引用本文的文献

4
Delirium in the ICU: how much do we know? A narrative review.ICU 相关性谵妄:我们了解多少?一篇综述。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2405072. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2405072. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Drug therapy for delirium in terminally ill adults.晚期成年患者谵妄的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 21;1(1):CD004770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004770.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验