Bobeff Ernest J, Szmyd Bartosz, Młynarski Wojciech, Jouanneau Emmanuel, Apra Caroline, Shen Ming, Patel Zara M, Jaskólski Dariusz J, Schwartz Theodore H
Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, Barlicki University Hospital, Kopcinskiego St. 22, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.
Department of Sleep Medicine and Metabolic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Mazowieka St. 6/8, 92-251 Lodz, Poland.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;17(15):2516. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152516.
Craniopharyngioma recurrence risk studies comparing gross total resection (GTR) vs. subtotal resection (STR) with radiotherapy (XRT) provide inconclusive or contradictory results. This may be an effect of the small group sizes and diversity in the approaches used. Currently, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is preferred in craniopharyngioma management. Here, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing recurrence risk after GTR vs. STR plus XRT in patients treated with the EEA regimen.
We performed a systematic literature search of original English language papers on craniopharyngioma management published in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to 18 October 2023. Eleven articles included data on recurrence rate after EEA: GTR vs. STR with XRT. We extracted the year of publication, number of patients, surgical approach, extent of resection, and follow-up duration. We used meta-analysis for the odds ratio (OR) in fixed and random effects models and Egger's and Begg's tests to assess heterogeneity and publication bias. Follow-up duration and time to recurrence were additionally included in Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test analysis.
We observed a lower recurrence rate in patients after GTR (10%) as compared to STR with XRT (30%), OR = 0.299, < 0.001. To increase data reliability, we limited our analysis to studies with at least five patients in each subgroup and also observed lower recurrence in patients after GTR (12%) as compared to STR with XRT (27%), OR = 0.376, = 0.011. Survival analysis confirmed significant differences in recurrence-free survival percentages between these groups ( = 0.008).
To date, this is the largest meta-analysis evaluating the recurrence risk in patients undergoing EEA for craniopharyngioma resection, comparing outcomes between those treated with GTR and those treated with STR plus XRT. The results suggest that GTR significantly reduces recurrence risk.
比较颅咽管瘤全切术(GTR)与次全切除术(STR)联合放射治疗(XRT)的复发风险研究结果尚无定论或相互矛盾。这可能是由于样本量小以及所采用方法的多样性所致。目前,内镜鼻内入路(EEA)在颅咽管瘤治疗中更受青睐。在此,我们旨在进行一项荟萃分析,比较接受EEA治疗方案的患者中GTR与STR加XRT后的复发风险。
我们对截至2023年10月18日在PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库中发表的关于颅咽管瘤治疗的英文原始论文进行了系统的文献检索。11篇文章包含了EEA后复发率的数据:GTR与STR联合XRT。我们提取了发表年份、患者数量、手术入路、切除范围和随访时间。我们在固定效应模型和随机效应模型中使用荟萃分析计算优势比(OR),并使用Egger检验和Begg检验评估异质性和发表偏倚。随访时间和复发时间另外纳入Kaplan-Meier曲线并进行对数秩检验分析。
我们观察到GTR后患者的复发率(10%)低于STR联合XRT后的患者(30%),OR = 0.299,P < 0.001。为提高数据可靠性,我们将分析限于每个亚组至少有5名患者的研究,并且还观察到GTR后患者的复发率(12%)低于STR联合XRT后的患者(27%),OR = 0.376,P = 0.011。生存分析证实这些组之间无复发生存率百分比存在显著差异(P = 0.008)。
迄今为止,这是评估接受EEA进行颅咽管瘤切除术患者复发风险的最大规模荟萃分析,比较了GTR治疗患者与STR加XRT治疗患者的结果。结果表明GTR显著降低了复发风险。