• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

樟科植物的比较叶绿体基因组学、系统发育基因组学及分歧时间研究

Comparative Chloroplast Genomics, Phylogenomics, and Divergence Times of (Lauraceae).

作者信息

Li Zhiyuan, Zhang Yunyan, Tng David Y P, Chen Qixun, Wang Yahong, Tian Yongjing, Zhou Jingbo, Wang Zhongsheng

机构信息

College of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Centre for Rainforest Studies, The School for Field Studies, Yungaburra, QLD 4884, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 30;26(15):7357. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157357.

DOI:10.3390/ijms26157357
PMID:40806486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12347910/
Abstract

In the traditional classification system of the Lauraceae family based on morphology and anatomy, the phylogenetic position of the genus has long been controversial. Chloroplast (cp) evolution of has not yet been illuminated. In this study, we first sequenced and assembled the complete cp genomes of , and conducted the comparative cp genomics, phylogenomics, and divergence time estimation of this ecological and economic important genus. The whole length of cp genomes of the 10 ranged from 151,970 bp to 154,011 bp with typical quadripartite structure, conserved gene arrangements and contents. Variations in length of cp were observed in the inverted repeat regions (IRs) and a relatively high usage frequency of codons ending with T/A was detected. Four hypervariable intergenic regions (A-D, H-A, 15-1, and A-J) and 672 cp microsatellites were identified for . Phylogenetic analysis based on 106 cp genomes from 30 genera within the Lauraceae family demonstrated that constituted a monophyletic clade and grouped a sister branch with the sect. within the tribe Cinnamomeae. Divergence time between and its East Asian siblings was estimated at the Middle Miocene (16.98 Mya), diverged from at the Pleistocene epoch (3.63 Mya). Combined with fossil evidence, our results further revealed the crucial role of the Bering Land Bridge and glacial refugia in the speciation and differentiation of . Overall, our study clarified the evolution pattern of cp genomes and elucidated the phylogenetic position and divergence time framework of .

摘要

在基于形态学和解剖学的樟科传统分类系统中,该属的系统发育位置长期以来一直存在争议。其叶绿体(cp)进化尚未得到阐明。在本研究中,我们首先对该属的完整cp基因组进行了测序和组装,并对这个具有生态和经济重要性的属进行了比较cp基因组学、系统发育基因组学和分歧时间估计。10个该属物种的cp基因组全长在151,970 bp至154,011 bp之间,具有典型的四分体结构、保守的基因排列和内容。在反向重复区域(IRs)观察到cp长度的变化,并检测到以T/A结尾的密码子使用频率相对较高。为该属鉴定出四个高变基因间隔区(A-D、H-A、15-1和A-J)和672个cp微卫星。基于樟科30个属的106个cp基因组的系统发育分析表明,该属构成一个单系类群,并与樟族肉桂亚族的某组形成姐妹分支。该属与其东亚近缘种之间的分歧时间估计在中新世中期(1698万年前),该属在更新世时期(363万年前)与某属分化。结合化石证据,我们的结果进一步揭示了白令陆桥和冰川避难所在该属物种形成和分化中的关键作用。总体而言,我们的研究阐明了该属cp基因组的进化模式,并阐明了该属的系统发育位置和分歧时间框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/fec765516c09/ijms-26-07357-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/afe783278a20/ijms-26-07357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/cc16502e67a1/ijms-26-07357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/415bcf705155/ijms-26-07357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/1cde1b63e1c9/ijms-26-07357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/f787b34ef30b/ijms-26-07357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/fec765516c09/ijms-26-07357-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/afe783278a20/ijms-26-07357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/cc16502e67a1/ijms-26-07357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/415bcf705155/ijms-26-07357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/1cde1b63e1c9/ijms-26-07357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/f787b34ef30b/ijms-26-07357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5029/12347910/fec765516c09/ijms-26-07357-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Chloroplast Genomics, Phylogenomics, and Divergence Times of (Lauraceae).樟科植物的比较叶绿体基因组学、系统发育基因组学及分歧时间研究
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 30;26(15):7357. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157357.
2
Molecular evolution of chloroplast genome in Triumfetta (Grewioideae, Malvaceae).刺蒴麻属(锦葵科扁担杆亚科)叶绿体基因组的分子进化
Planta. 2025 Aug 14;262(4):82. doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04795-x.
3
Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Species (Fagaceae) in South China.中国南方壳斗科物种叶绿体全基因组的比较与系统发育分析
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 22;16(6):616. doi: 10.3390/genes16060616.
4
Complete chloroplast genome of two Brachycorythis (Orchidaceae) species from China: comparative analysis and phylogenetic implications.来自中国的两种苞叶兰属(兰科)植物的叶绿体全基因组:比较分析及系统发育意义
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11791-8.
5
Comparative analysis of 18 chloroplast genomes reveals genomic diversity and evolutionary dynamics in subtribe Malaxidinae (Orchidaceae).18个叶绿体基因组的比较分析揭示了沼兰亚族(兰科)的基因组多样性和进化动态。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06772-8.
6
Thirteen complete chloroplast genomes of the costaceae family: insights into genome structure, selective pressure and phylogenetic relationships.十三份藜科植物完整的叶绿体基因组:对基因组结构、选择压力和系统发育关系的深入了解。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Jan 17;25(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-09996-4.
7
Three complete chloroplast genomes from two north American Rhus species and phylogenomics of Anacardiaceae.来自北美黄栌属两个种的三个完整的叶绿体基因组和漆树科的系统基因组学研究。
BMC Genom Data. 2024 Mar 15;25(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12863-024-01200-6.
8
Comparative chloroplast genomics and phylogenetic analysis of Oreomecon nudicaulis (Papaveraceae).比较研究山罂粟(罂粟科)的叶绿体基因组和系统发育分析。
BMC Genom Data. 2024 May 30;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12863-024-01236-8.
9
Insights into chloroplast genome structure and phylogenetic position of the Lacquer tree Toxicodendron trichocarpum (Anacardiaceae: Rhoideae).漆树毛果漆(漆树科:漆亚科)叶绿体基因组结构及系统发育位置的研究
J Plant Res. 2025 Jul 27. doi: 10.1007/s10265-025-01661-5.
10
Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes of 19 Species, Mostly from the European Alps.19种植物叶绿体基因组的比较分析,多数来自欧洲阿尔卑斯山地区
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 23;26(13):6015. doi: 10.3390/ijms26136015.

本文引用的文献

1
Global advances in phylogeny, taxonomy and biogeography of Lauraceae.樟科在系统发育、分类学和生物地理学方面的全球进展。
Plant Divers. 2025 Apr 7;47(3):341-364. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2025.04.001. eCollection 2025 May.
2
New insights into the phylogenetic relationships within the Lauraceae from mitogenomes.从线粒体基因组看樟科内的系统发育关系的新认识。
BMC Biol. 2024 Oct 23;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-02040-7.
3
Environment influences the genetic structure and genetic differentiation of Sassafras tzumu (Lauraceae).环境影响了厚叶楠(樟科)的遗传结构和遗传分化。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02264-9.
4
Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses.使用PhyloSuite进行分子系统发育和基于树的分析。
Imeta. 2023 Feb 16;2(1):e87. doi: 10.1002/imt2.87. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
New insights into the plastome evolution of Lauraceae using herbariomics.利用标本学研究樟科植物质体基因组进化的新见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04396-4.
6
Impacts of Taxon-Sampling Schemes on Bayesian Tip Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.分类群抽样方案对化石 Birth-Death 过程下贝叶斯枝点日期推断的影响。
Syst Biol. 2023 Aug 7;72(4):781-801. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syad011.
7
Phylogeny and taxonomy of (Lauraceae).樟科的系统发育与分类学
Ecol Evol. 2022 Oct 1;12(10):e9378. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9378. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Plastome structure, phylogenomics, and divergence times of tribe Cinnamomeae (Lauraceae).质体结构、系统发育基因组学和樟科樟族的分歧时间。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Sep 8;23(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08855-4.
9
Plastid phylogenomic insights into relationships of all flowering plant families.质体系统基因组学对所有开花植物科之间关系的见解。
BMC Biol. 2021 Oct 29;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01166-2.
10
GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes.GetOrganelle:一个快速且通用的工具包,可用于准确从头组装细胞器基因组。
Genome Biol. 2020 Sep 10;21(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5.