• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从线粒体基因组看樟科内的系统发育关系的新认识。

New insights into the phylogenetic relationships within the Lauraceae from mitogenomes.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Ministry of Education) & Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China.

CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Plant Resources and Sustainable Use, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, 666303, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

BMC Biol. 2024 Oct 23;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-02040-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12915-024-02040-7
PMID:39444010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515631/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The family Lauraceae is subdivided into six main lineages: Caryodaphnopsideae, Cassytheae, Cryptocaryeae, Hypodaphnideae, Laureae, and Neocinnamomeae. However, phylogenetic relationships among these lineages have been debatable due to incongruence between trees constructed using nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) sequences and chloroplast (cp) genomes. As with cp DNA, the mitochondrial (mt) DNA of most flowering plants is maternally inherited, so the phylogenetic relationships recovered with mt genomes are expected to be consistent with that from cp genomes, rather than nrDNA sequences.

RESULTS

The mitogenome of Machilus yunnanensis, with a length of 735,392 bp, has a very different genome size and gene linear order from previously published magnoliid mitogenomes. Phylogenomic reconstructions based on 41 mt genes from 92 Lauraceae mitogenomes resulted in highly supported relationships: sisterhood of the Laureae and a group containing Neocinnamomeae and Caryodaphnopsideae, with Cassytheae being the next sister group, followed by Cryptocaryeae. However, we found significant incongruence among the mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear phylogenies, especially for the species within the Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae lineages. Time-calibrated phylogenetic analyses showed that the split between Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae dated to the later Eocene, around 38.5 Ma, Laureae originated in the Late Cretaceous, around 84.9 Ma, Cassytheae originated in the mid-Cretaceous around 102 Ma, and Cryptocaryeae originated in the Early Cretaceous around 116 Ma. From the Late Cretaceous to the Paleocene, net diversification rates significantly increased across extant clades of major lineages, and both speciation rates and net diversification rates continued steady growth towards the present.

CONCLUSIONS

The topology obtained here for the first time shows that mt genes can be used to support relationships among lineages of Lauraceae. Our results highlight that both Caryodaphnopsideae and Neocinnamomeae lineages are younger than previously thought, likely first diversifying in the Eocene, and species in the other extant lineages of Lauraceae dates in a long-time span from the Early Cretaceous to the Eocene, and the climate of a period of about 90 million years was relatively warm, while the extant species of Lauraceae then continuously diversified with global cooling from the Eocene to the present day.

摘要

背景

樟科(Lauraceae)分为六个主要谱系:肉实树族(Caryodaphnopsideae)、鳄梨族(Cassytheae)、樟族(Cryptocaryeae)、暗罗族(Hypodaphnideae)、樟族(Laureae)和新樟族(Neocinnamomeae)。然而,由于核核糖体 DNA(nrDNA)序列和叶绿体(cp)基因组构建的树之间存在不一致,这些谱系之间的系统发育关系一直存在争议。与 cp DNA 一样,大多数有花植物的线粒体(mt)DNA是母系遗传的,因此用 mt 基因组重建的系统发育关系预计与 cp 基因组一致,而不是与 nrDNA 序列一致。

结果

Machilus yunnanensis 的线粒体基因组长 735392bp,与已发表的木兰类线粒体基因组相比,其基因组大小和基因线性顺序差异很大。基于 92 个樟科线粒体基因组中的 41 个 mt 基因进行的系统基因组重建得到了高度支持的关系:樟族和包含新樟族和肉实树族的一个组是姐妹群,鳄梨族是下一个姐妹群,其次是樟族。然而,我们发现线粒体、叶绿体和核系统发育之间存在显著的不一致,尤其是在肉实树族和新樟族的物种中。时间校准的系统发育分析表明,肉实树族和新樟族的分裂发生在始新世晚期,约 38.5 百万年前,樟族起源于白垩纪晚期,约 84.9 百万年前,鳄梨族起源于白垩纪中期,约 102 百万年前,樟族起源于白垩纪早期,约 116 百万年前。从白垩纪晚期到古近纪,现存主要谱系的分支净多样化率显著增加,种形成率和净多样化率一直持续到现在。

结论

这里首次获得的拓扑结构表明,mt 基因可用于支持樟科各谱系之间的关系。我们的结果表明,肉实树族和新樟族的谱系都比以前认为的年轻,可能最早在始新世多样化,而樟科现存其他谱系的物种在从早白垩世到始新世的很长一段时间内都有记载,大约 9000 万年的气候相对温暖,而现存的樟科物种则随着从始新世到现在的全球变冷而不断多样化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/79b278ad12c5/12915_2024_2040_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/f378c887b051/12915_2024_2040_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/427573220a1f/12915_2024_2040_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/12f414374ef8/12915_2024_2040_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/64f86feb548d/12915_2024_2040_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/1289c46f40e1/12915_2024_2040_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/79b278ad12c5/12915_2024_2040_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/f378c887b051/12915_2024_2040_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/427573220a1f/12915_2024_2040_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/12f414374ef8/12915_2024_2040_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/64f86feb548d/12915_2024_2040_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/1289c46f40e1/12915_2024_2040_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/11515631/79b278ad12c5/12915_2024_2040_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
New insights into the phylogenetic relationships within the Lauraceae from mitogenomes.从线粒体基因组看樟科内的系统发育关系的新认识。
BMC Biol. 2024 Oct 23;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-02040-7.
2
Phylogenetic incongruence in an Asiatic species complex of the genus Caryodaphnopsis (Lauraceae).亚洲蜡瓣花属(樟科)一个种复合体的系统发育不吻合。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05050-3.
3
Whole genome based insights into the phylogeny and evolution of the Juglandaceae.基于全基因组的山毛榉科系统发育和进化研究。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01917-3.
4
Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Persea group (Lauraceae) and its biogeographic implications on the evolution of tropical and subtropical Amphi-Pacific disjunctions.分子系统发育分析番荔枝属(樟科)及其在热带和亚热带泛太平洋间断分布进化上的生物地理意义。
Am J Bot. 2011 Sep;98(9):1520-36. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100006. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
5
Plastome phylogenomics, systematics, and divergence time estimation of the Beilschmiedia group (Lauraceae).质体基因组系统发育学、系统学和伯乐树组(樟科)的分歧时间估计。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020 Oct;151:106901. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106901. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
6
Phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates of softshell turtles (Testudines: Trionychidae) inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.基于完整线粒体基因组推断鳖科(龟鳖目:鳖科)的系统发育关系和分化时间。
J Evol Biol. 2017 May;30(5):1011-1023. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13070. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
7
The Phylogenetic Relationships of Major Lizard Families Using Mitochondrial Genomes and Selection Pressure Analyses in Anguimorpha.利用线粒体基因组和选择压力分析探讨有鳞目主要蜥蜴科的系统发育关系。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 2;25(15):8464. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158464.
8
Plastome Evolution in the Sole Hemiparasitic Genus Laurel Dodder (Cassytha) and Insights into the Plastid Phylogenomics of Lauraceae.质体在单性寄生属贯叶连翘(Cassytha)中的进化及樟科质体系统发生基因组学的研究进展
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):2604-2614. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx177.
9
Beyond Conus: Phylogenetic relationships of Conidae based on complete mitochondrial genomes.超越芋螺属:基于完整线粒体基因组的芋螺科系统发育关系
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 Feb;107:142-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
New insights into the plastome evolution of Lauraceae using herbariomics.利用标本学研究樟科植物质体基因组进化的新见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04396-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Chloroplast Genomics, Phylogenomics, and Divergence Times of (Lauraceae).樟科植物的比较叶绿体基因组学、系统发育基因组学及分歧时间研究
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 30;26(15):7357. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157357.
2
Mitochondrial genome analysis of the endangered Oreocharis esquirolii: insights into evolutionary adaptation and conservation.濒危植物壶花苣苔的线粒体基因组分析:对进化适应与保护的见解
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06838-7.
3
Global advances in phylogeny, taxonomy and biogeography of Lauraceae.

本文引用的文献

1
Subgenome-aware analyses reveal the genomic consequences of ancient allopolyploid hybridizations throughout the cotton family.亚基因组感知分析揭示了棉属植物远古异源多倍体杂交的基因组后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 9;121(15):e2313921121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313921121. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Plant organellar genomes: much done, much more to do.植物细胞器基因组:完成了很多,还有更多要做。
Trends Plant Sci. 2024 Jul;29(7):754-769. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.12.014. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
3
Remarkable mitochondrial genome heterogeneity in Meniocus linifolius (Brassicaceae).
樟科在系统发育、分类学和生物地理学方面的全球进展。
Plant Divers. 2025 Apr 7;47(3):341-364. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2025.04.001. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Advances in the Evolutionary Mechanisms and Genomic Studies of Sexual Differentiation in Lauraceae Plants.樟科植物性别分化的进化机制与基因组学研究进展
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 2;26(9):4335. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094335.
5
Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial genomes of Neocinnamomum.新樟属线粒体基因组的比较基因组学和系统发育分析
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06238-x.
在山黧豆属(十字花科)中发现显著的线粒体基因组异质性。
Plant Cell Rep. 2024 Jan 11;43(2):36. doi: 10.1007/s00299-023-03102-w.
4
New insights into the plastome evolution of Lauraceae using herbariomics.利用标本学研究樟科植物质体基因组进化的新见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04396-4.
5
De novo Assembly and Comparative Analyses of Mitochondrial Genomes in Piperales.石蒜科线粒体基因组的从头组装和比较分析。
Genome Biol Evol. 2023 Mar 3;15(3). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evad041.
6
Phylogenomic insights into the origin and evolutionary history of evergreen broadleaved forests in East Asia under Cenozoic climate change.在新生代气候变化下,对东亚常绿阔叶林起源和进化历史的系统基因组学研究。
Mol Ecol. 2023 Jun;32(11):2850-2868. doi: 10.1111/mec.16904. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
Genome-scale angiosperm phylogenies based on nuclear, plastome, and mitochondrial datasets.基于核、质体和线粒体数据集的被子植物全基因组系统发育分析。
J Integr Plant Biol. 2023 Jun;65(6):1479-1489. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13455. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
8
Deciphering the mitochondrial genome of (Asphodelaceae) using a combined assembly and comparative genomic strategy.使用组合组装和比较基因组策略解析(天门冬科)的线粒体基因组。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Nov 18;13:1051221. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1051221. eCollection 2022.
9
Rearrangement and domestication as drivers of Rosaceae mitogenome plasticity.蔷薇科线粒体基因组可塑性的重排和驯化驱动因素。
BMC Biol. 2022 Aug 19;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01383-3.
10
Mitochondrial genomic data are effective at placing mycoheterotrophic lineages in plant phylogeny.线粒体基因组数据可有效确定菌根异养谱系在植物系统发育中的位置。
New Phytol. 2022 Dec;236(5):1908-1921. doi: 10.1111/nph.18335. Epub 2022 Jul 12.