Miret Juan J, Camps Vicente J, García Celia, Caballero Maria T, Sempere-Molina Antonio, Gonzalez-Leal Juan M
Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 29;14(15):5336. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155336.
: To assess the optical performance of two refractive premium IOLs across pupil sizes and values of corneal spherical aberration (SA). : Two refractive IOLs were evaluated in this study: Tecnis Eyhance and Mini Well. The surface profiles were obtained to calculate the through-object MTF (TO MTF) curves and simulate optotype images. Entrance pupil sizes ranging from 2 to 5.5 and three corneal models were analyzed in the simulation: an average population aberrated cornea, an aberration-free cornea and a post-Lasik myopic cornea. : For Model 1 and pupil sizes between 3.0 and 3.5 mm, Mini Well provided acceptable visual quality from far to near distances, whereas Eyhance struggled to maintain visual quality at distances closer than intermediate. For patients with lower-than-normal corneal SA (i.e., more prolate corneas, such as post-hyperopic LASIK) both IOLs exhibited a hyperopic shift in far focus. Conversely, for patients with higher-than-normal corneal SA (i.e., more oblate corneas, such as post-myopic LASIK), the shift occurred in the myopic direction. Despite the implementation of an optimized IOL power to circumvent any shift, the TO MTF nevertheless reflected the interaction between corneal and IOL SA. Furthermore, the Mini Well demonstrated increased tolerance to less negative SA values, while Eyhance exhibited behavior consistent with a monofocal lens for more positive SA values. : Surgeons should consider each patient's corneal asphericity and typical pupil diameter when selecting and calculating the power of the premium IOLs studied, particularly in patients with a history of refractive surgery.
评估两种屈光性高端人工晶状体在不同瞳孔大小和角膜球差(SA)值下的光学性能。
Tecnis Eyhance和Mini Well。获取表面轮廓以计算通过物体的调制传递函数(TO MTF)曲线并模拟视标图像。在模拟中分析了2至5.5的入瞳大小和三种角膜模型:平均人群的像差角膜、无像差角膜和准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后的近视角膜。
对于模型1和3.0至3.5毫米之间的瞳孔大小,Mini Well在从远到近的距离上提供了可接受的视觉质量,而Eyhance在比中间距离更近时难以保持视觉质量。对于角膜SA低于正常的患者(即更扁平的角膜,如远视LASIK术后),两种人工晶状体在远焦点处均表现出远视偏移。相反,对于角膜SA高于正常的患者(即更椭圆的角膜,如近视LASIK术后),偏移发生在近视方向。尽管实施了优化的人工晶状体屈光度以规避任何偏移,但TO MTF仍然反映了角膜和人工晶状体SA之间的相互作用。此外,Mini Well对较低的负SA值表现出更高的耐受性,而Eyhance对于更正的SA值表现出与单焦点晶状体一致的行为。
在选择和计算所研究的高端人工晶状体的屈光度时,外科医生应考虑每个患者的角膜非球面性和典型瞳孔直径,特别是在有屈光手术史的患者中。