Guerra-Vega Pablo, Guzmán Rodrigo, Betancourt Claudio, Grage Mario, Vera Cristian, Artigas-Arias Macarena, Muñoz-Cofré Rodrigo, Vitzel Kaio F, Marzuca-Nassr Gabriel Nasri
Hospital Base San José Osorno, Osorno 1765, Chile.
Departamento de Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Claro Solar 115, Temuco 1145, Chile.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5407. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155407.
This study aimed to compare the effects of low- and medium-frequency NMES, combined with a standard physical therapy (SPT) program, on functional capacity in critically ill patients. Fifty-four critically ill patients admitted into Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and on mechanical ventilation participated in this randomized, single-blinded, experimental study. Participants were randomly assigned to a Control group, who received a lower limb SPT program; the Low-frequency NMES group received lower limb SPT + NMES at 100 Hz; and the Medium-frequency NMES group received lower limb SPT + NMES at 100 Hz with a carrier frequency of 2500 Hz. The outcomes, encompassing functional capacity in the hospital, included muscle strength, handgrip strength, functional status, degree of independence for activities of daily living, functional and dynamic mobility, quality of life, and total days hospitalized. Both NMES protocols combined with SPT improved functional capacity compared to the control group. Medium-frequency NMES provided additional benefits on dynamic balance, in the degree of independence to perform activities of daily living and quality of life (all < 0.001) prior to hospital discharge. It also promoted larger gains on functional status prior to ICU discharge and on knee extension strength (both < 0.05) prior to intermediate care unit discharge. Medium-frequency NMES also enhanced handgrip strength earlier than low-frequency NMES when compared to the control group. Notably, medium-frequency NMES was the only intervention associated with a significant reduction in total hospital stay duration ( < 0.05). Medium-frequency NMES, along with an SPT program in critically ill patients, showed greater benefits on functional capacity during recovery than low-frequency NMES. (Trial registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05287919). 1. Medium-frequency NMES may enhance physical functionality and quality of life in critically ill patients with ICU-acquired weakness. 2. Medium-frequency NMES can reduce the number of hospitalization days. 3. NMES combined with SPT represents a feasible and effective option for patients unable to engage in active rehabilitation during critical illness.
本研究旨在比较低频和中频神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)联合标准物理治疗(SPT)方案对危重症患者功能能力的影响。54名入住重症监护病房(ICU)并接受机械通气的危重症患者参与了这项随机、单盲实验研究。参与者被随机分配到对照组,接受下肢SPT方案;低频NMES组接受下肢SPT + 100Hz的NMES;中频NMES组接受下肢SPT + 100Hz且载波频率为2500Hz的NMES。包括住院期间功能能力的结果指标有肌肉力量、握力、功能状态、日常生活活动的独立程度、功能和动态活动能力、生活质量以及总住院天数。与对照组相比,两种NMES方案联合SPT均改善了功能能力。中频NMES在出院前对动态平衡、日常生活活动的独立程度和生活质量有额外益处(均P<0.001)。它还在ICU出院前对功能状态以及在中级护理病房出院前对膝关节伸展力量有更大改善(均P<0.05)。与对照组相比,中频NMES比低频NMES更早增强握力。值得注意的是,中频NMES是唯一与总住院时间显著缩短相关的干预措施(P<0.05)。在危重症患者中,中频NMES与SPT方案一起,在恢复过程中对功能能力的益处比低频NMES更大。(试验注册:本试验在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册:NCT05287919)。1. 中频NMES可能增强患有ICU获得性肌无力的危重症患者的身体功能和生活质量。2. 中频NMES可减少住院天数。3. 对于在危重症期间无法进行主动康复的患者,NMES联合SPT是一种可行且有效的选择。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-3-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-6-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-10-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-1-6
J Intensive Med. 2023-8-30
Int J Mol Sci. 2020-10-22