神经肌肉电刺激对危重症患者的影响:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Critical Illness: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
作者信息
Nakanishi Nobuto, Yoshihiro Shodai, Kawamura Yusuke, Aikawa Gen, Shida Haruka, Shimizu Motohiro, Fujinami Yoshihisa, Matsuoka Ayaka, Watanabe Shinichi, Taito Shunsuke, Inoue Shigeaki
机构信息
Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Onomichi General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
出版信息
Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 1;51(10):1386-1396. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005941. Epub 2023 May 26.
OBJECTIVES
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is used in the rehabilitation of patients with critical illness. However, it is unclear whether NMES prevents ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). For this purpose, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases from April 2019 to November 2022 to identify new randomized controlled trials to the previous meta-analysis.
STUDY SELECTION
We systematically searched the literature for all randomized controlled trials on the effect of NMES in patients with critical illness.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two authors independently selected the studies and extracted data. They calculated the pooled effect estimates associated with the occurrence of ICU-AW and adverse events as primary outcomes and muscle mass change, muscle strength, length of ICU stay, mortality, and quality of life as secondary outcomes. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Overall, eight studies were added to the previous 10 studies. Evidence suggests that the use of NMES reduces the occurrence of ICU-AW (six trials; risk ratio [RR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.72); however, NMES may have little to no effect on pricking sensation in patients (eight trials; RR, 6.87; 95% CI, 0.84-56.50). NMES is likely to reduce the change in muscle mass (four trials; mean difference, -10.01; 95% CI, -15.54 to -4.48) and may increase muscle strength (six trials; standardized mean difference, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.68). Further, NMES may result in little to no difference in the length of ICU stay, and the evidence is uncertain about the effect on mortality and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS
This updated meta-analysis revealed that the use of NMES may result in a lower occurrence of ICU-AW in patients with critical illness, but its use may have little to no effect on pricking sensation in patients.
目的
神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)用于危重症患者的康复治疗。然而,NMES是否能预防重症监护病房获得性肌无力(ICU-AW)尚不清楚。为此,我们进行了一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
数据来源
我们检索了2019年4月至2022年11月的MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和《医学中央杂志》数据库,以确定纳入之前荟萃分析的新随机对照试验。
研究选择
我们系统检索了关于NMES对危重症患者影响的所有随机对照试验的文献。
数据提取
两位作者独立选择研究并提取数据。他们计算了与ICU-AW发生和不良事件相关的合并效应估计值作为主要结局,肌肉质量变化、肌肉力量、ICU住院时间、死亡率和生活质量作为次要结局。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法评估证据的确定性。
数据综合
总体而言,在前10项研究的基础上又增加了8项研究。证据表明,使用NMES可降低ICU-AW的发生率(6项试验;风险比[RR],0.48;95%CI,0.32-0.72);然而,NMES对患者刺痛感可能几乎没有影响(8项试验;RR,6.87;95%CI,0.84-56.50)。NMES可能会减少肌肉质量的变化(4项试验;平均差,-10.01;95%CI,-15.54至-4.48),并可能增加肌肉力量(6项试验;标准化平均差,0.43;95%CI,0.19-0.68)。此外,NMES可能对ICU住院时间几乎没有影响,关于其对死亡率和生活质量影响的证据尚不确定。
结论
这项更新的荟萃分析表明,使用NMES可能会降低危重症患者ICU-AW的发生率,但其使用可能对患者的刺痛感几乎没有影响。