Li Qinlong, Che Kaixuan, Yu Wenlang, Song Wenda, Zhou Yue
Department of Exercise Physiology, Exercise Science School, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Department of Exercise Biochemistry, Exercise Science School, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;25(15):4875. doi: 10.3390/s25154875.
Compression pants, as functional sportswear providing external pressure, are widely used to enhance athletic performance and accelerate recovery. However, systematic investigations into their effectiveness during anaerobic exercise and the impact of different pressure levels on performance and post-exercise recovery remain limited. This randomized crossover controlled trial recruited 20 healthy male university students to compare the effects of four garment conditions: non-compressive pants (NCP), moderate-pressure compression pants (MCP), high-pressure compression pants (HCP), and ultra-high-pressure compression pants (UHCP). Anaerobic performance was assessed through vertical jump, agility tests, and the Wingate anaerobic test, with indicators including time at peak power (TPP), peak power (PP), average power (AP), minimum power (MP), power drop (PD), and total energy produced (TEP). Post-exercise blood lactate concentrations and heart rate responses were also monitored. The results showed that both HCP and UHCP significantly improved vertical jump height ( < 0.01), while MCP outperformed all other conditions in agility performance ( < 0.05). In the Wingate test, MCP achieved a shorter TPP compared to NCP ( < 0.05), with significantly higher AP, lower PD, and greater TEP than all other groups ( < 0.05), whereas HCP showed an advantage only in PP over NCP ( < 0.05). Post-exercise, all compression pant groups recorded significantly higher peak blood lactate (Lamax) levels than NCP ( < 0.05), with MCP showing the fastest lactate clearance rate. Heart rate analysis revealed that HCP and UHCP induced higher maximum heart rates (HR) ( < 0.05), while MCP exhibited superior heart rate recovery at 3, 5, and 10 min post-exercise (< 0.05). These findings suggest that compression pants with different pressure levels yield distinct effects on anaerobic performance and physiological recovery. Moderate-pressure compression pants demonstrated the most balanced and beneficial outcomes across multiple performance and recovery metrics, providing practical implications for the individualized design and application of compression garments in athletic training and rehabilitation.
压缩裤作为一种提供外部压力的功能性运动服装,被广泛用于提高运动表现和加速恢复。然而,关于其在无氧运动期间的有效性以及不同压力水平对运动表现和运动后恢复的影响的系统性研究仍然有限。这项随机交叉对照试验招募了20名健康的男性大学生,以比较四种服装条件的效果:非压缩裤(NCP)、中压压缩裤(MCP)、高压压缩裤(HCP)和超高压压缩裤(UHCP)。通过垂直跳跃、敏捷性测试和温盖特无氧测试评估无氧运动表现,指标包括峰值功率时间(TPP)、峰值功率(PP)、平均功率(AP)、最小功率(MP)、功率下降(PD)和总能量产生(TEP)。还监测了运动后血乳酸浓度和心率反应。结果表明,HCP和UHCP均显著提高了垂直跳跃高度(<0.01),而MCP在敏捷性表现方面优于所有其他条件(<0.05)。在温盖特测试中,与NCP相比,MCP的TPP更短(<0.05),其AP显著高于所有其他组,PD更低,TEP更大(<0.05),而HCP仅在PP方面比NCP具有优势(<0.05)。运动后,所有压缩裤组的血乳酸峰值(Lamax)水平均显著高于NCP(<0.05),MCP的乳酸清除率最快。心率分析显示,HCP和UHCP诱导的最高心率(HR)更高(<0.05),而MCP在运动后3、5和10分钟表现出更好的心率恢复(<0.05)。这些发现表明,不同压力水平的压缩裤对无氧运动表现和生理恢复产生不同的影响。中压压缩裤在多个运动表现和恢复指标上显示出最平衡和有益的结果,为压缩服装在运动训练和康复中的个性化设计和应用提供了实际意义。