Martvel George, Pedretti Giulia, Lazebnik Teddy, Zamansky Anna, Ouchi Yuri, Monteiro Tiago, Farhat Nareed, Shimshoni Ilan, Michaeli Yuval, Valsecchi Paola, Hall Nathaniel, Marshall-Pescini Sarah, Grinstein Dan
Department of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 13;12(8):250399. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250399. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Detection dogs are utilized for searching and alerting to various substances due to their olfactory abilities. Dog trainers report being able to 'predict' such identification based on subtle behavioural changes, such as tail movement. This study investigated tail kinematic patterns of dogs during a detection task, using computer vision to detect tail movement. Eight dogs searched for a target odour on a search wall, alerting to its presence by standing still. Dogs' detection accuracy against a distractor odour was 100% with trained concentration, while during threshold assessment, it progressively reached 50%. In the target odour area, dogs exhibited a higher left-sided tail-wagging amplitude. An artificial intelligence (AI) model showed a 77% accuracy score in the classification, and, in line with the dogs' performance, progressively decreased at lower odour concentrations. Additionally, we compared the performance of an AI classification model to that of 190 detection dog handlers in determining when a dog was in the vicinity of a target odour. The AI model outperformed dog professionals, correctly classifying 66% against 46% of videos. These findings indicate the potential of AI-enhanced techniques to reveal new insights into dogs' behavioural repertoire during odour discrimination.
由于嗅觉能力,探测犬被用于搜索和警示各种物质。犬类训练师报告称,能够根据诸如尾巴摆动等细微行为变化“预测”此类识别。本研究利用计算机视觉检测尾巴运动,调查了犬类在探测任务中的尾巴运动学模式。八只犬在一面搜索墙上寻找目标气味,通过静止站立来警示目标气味的存在。在经过训练集中注意力的情况下,犬类对干扰气味的探测准确率为100%,而在阈值评估期间,该准确率逐渐降至50%。在目标气味区域,犬类左侧尾巴摆动幅度更大。一个人工智能(AI)模型在分类中的准确率为77%,并且与犬类的表现一致,在较低气味浓度下准确率逐渐下降。此外,我们将一个AI分类模型的表现与190名探测犬训练员在判断犬是否处于目标气味附近时的表现进行了比较。AI模型的表现优于专业训犬人员,在视频分类中,AI模型的正确分类率为66%,而专业训犬人员的正确分类率为46%。这些发现表明,人工智能增强技术有潜力揭示犬类在气味辨别过程中行为表现的新见解。
J Anim Sci. 2024-1-3
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025-6-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-11-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-10-17
Front Allergy. 2024-3-12
Biol Lett. 2024-1
Curr Protoc. 2021-10
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2021
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019-11-29