• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受国外临床数据政策能否提高制药企业的创新投入?来自中国的实证证据。

Can the accepting foreign clinical data policy improve innovation investment of pharmaceutical firms? Empirical evidence from China.

作者信息

Jiang Mengjuan, Huang Jingjing, Wang Su, Fan Yulu, Chen Yuwen

机构信息

School of Business Administration, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.

College of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1512148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1512148. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1512148
PMID:40809767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12343521/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In October 2017, China initiated adjustments to the registration procedures for imported drugs to promote accessibility to overseas drugs. In support of this decision, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) issued a technical guideline regarding accepting foreign clinical trial data in July 2018. Collectively referred to as the accepting foreign clinical data policy, these measures have accelerated the influx of overseas drugs into China.

METHODS

Using the panel data from 104 A-share pharmaceutical listed firms between 2013 and 2024, this study conducted a difference-in-differences model to explore the impact of this policy on the innovation investment of Chinese pharmaceutical firms and further analyzed the underlying moderating effect.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate a significantly positive effect of this accepting foreign clinical data policy on pharmaceutical firms' innovation investment, which is verified with the parallel trend and robustness tests. Further analysis indicates that corporate absorptive capacity positively moderates the relationship between the policy implementation and innovation investment. In addition, the heterogeneity analysis suggests that this policy has a more significant effect on firms that are non-state-owned, engage in new drug research and have strong market power.

DISCUSSION

This study serves as a significant supplement to the current literature regarding the accepting foreign clinical data policy and innovation investment, providing valuable insights for policymakers and R&D decision-makers in the pharmaceutical sector.

摘要

引言

2017年10月,中国启动了进口药品注册程序调整,以促进海外药品的可及性。为支持这一决定,国家药品监督管理局(NMPA)于2018年7月发布了一项关于接受国外临床试验数据的技术指南。这些措施统称为接受国外临床数据政策,加速了海外药品涌入中国。

方法

本研究利用2013年至2024年间104家A股上市制药公司的面板数据,采用双重差分模型探讨该政策对中国制药公司创新投资的影响,并进一步分析潜在的调节效应。

结果

结果表明,接受国外临床数据政策对制药公司的创新投资具有显著的正向影响,这在平行趋势和稳健性检验中得到了验证。进一步分析表明,企业吸收能力对政策实施与创新投资之间的关系具有正向调节作用。此外,异质性分析表明,该政策对非国有企业、从事新药研发且具有较强市场势力的公司影响更为显著。

讨论

本研究是当前关于接受国外临床数据政策与创新投资文献的重要补充,为制药行业的政策制定者和研发决策者提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/69b9cd5db591/fpubh-13-1512148-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/8f9f10596796/fpubh-13-1512148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/0bd6730241e9/fpubh-13-1512148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/28cda3aa2b33/fpubh-13-1512148-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/8df639a5f3c0/fpubh-13-1512148-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/69b9cd5db591/fpubh-13-1512148-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/8f9f10596796/fpubh-13-1512148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/0bd6730241e9/fpubh-13-1512148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/28cda3aa2b33/fpubh-13-1512148-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/8df639a5f3c0/fpubh-13-1512148-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12343521/69b9cd5db591/fpubh-13-1512148-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Can the accepting foreign clinical data policy improve innovation investment of pharmaceutical firms? Empirical evidence from China.接受国外临床数据政策能否提高制药企业的创新投入?来自中国的实证证据。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1512148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1512148. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Can the Marketing Authorisation Holder system improve the ESG performance of pharmaceutical manufacturers?上市许可持有人制度能否提升制药企业的环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效?
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1587028. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1587028. eCollection 2025.
5
Innovation and valuation of Chinese born-global firms.中国天生国际化企业的创新与估值
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0325214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325214. eCollection 2025.
6
Pharmacological treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux.胃食管反流患儿的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24;2014(11):CD008550. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008550.pub2.
7
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
8
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
9
[Guidelines for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma (2024 edition)].[支气管哮喘防治指南(2024年版)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 12;48(3):208-248. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20241013-00601.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing medical innovation and affordability in the new healthcare ecosystem in China: Review of pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies.平衡中国新医疗生态系统中的医疗创新与可负担性:药品定价与报销政策综述
Health Care Sci. 2023 Dec 11;2(6):381-391. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.76. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Investigating the crowding effect of FDI on domestic investments: Evidence from Bangladesh.探究外国直接投资对国内投资的挤出效应:来自孟加拉国的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e31092. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31092. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3
Has the consistency evaluation policy of generic drugs promoted the innovation quality of Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturing industry? An empirical study based on the difference-in-differences model.
仿制药一致性评价政策是否提升了中国制药制造业的创新质量?基于双重差分模型的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;11:1265756. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1265756. eCollection 2023.
4
Does China's centralized volume-based drug procurement policy facilitate the transition from imitation to innovation for listed pharmaceutical companies? Empirical tests based on double difference model.中国的药品集中带量采购政策是否有助于上市制药企业从仿制药向创新药转型?基于双重差分模型的实证检验。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 30;14:1192423. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1192423. eCollection 2023.
5
Criteria and regulatory considerations for the conditional approval of innovative antitumor drugs in China: from the perspective of clinical reviewers.中国创新抗肿瘤药物附条件批准的标准及监管考量:临床审评视角
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023 Feb;43(2):171-176. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12400. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
6
Evolution of drug regulations and regulatory innovation for anticancer drugs in China.中国抗癌药物法规的演变与监管创新
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022 Dec;12(12):4365-4377. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
7
Assessment of the Delay in Novel Anticancer Drugs between China and the United States: A Comparative Study of Drugs Approved between 2010 and 2021.中美新型抗癌药物获批时间延迟情况评估:2010年至2021年获批药物的对比研究
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;113(1):170-181. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2755. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
8
The Impact of the Consistency Evaluation Policy of Generic Drugs on R&D Investment Intensity of Pharmaceutical Companies-An Empirical Study Based on the Difference-in-Differences Model.仿制药一致性评价政策对制药企业研发投入强度的影响——基于双重差分模型的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:902025. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902025. eCollection 2022.
9
FDA decisions on new oncological drugs.美国食品药品监督管理局对新型肿瘤药物的审批决定。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 May;23(5):583-585. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00136-X.
10
Importing oncology trials from China: a bridge over troubled waters?引入来自中国的肿瘤学试验:能否跨越困境之桥?
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):323-325. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00071-7. Epub 2022 Feb 4.